Faculty of Educational Studies, Department of Sports Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Serdang, Malaysia.
School of Physical Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0311321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311321. eCollection 2024.
Since the Tactical Games Model (TGM) was adopted and popularised by Oslin, Griffin, and Mitchell, research interest in this model has surged, increasing its application in teaching and research. However, much-existing research is fragmented and lacks a comprehensive review. This systematic review aims to fill that gap by thoroughly analysing the literature on TGM within the context of physical education, highlighting current trends and developments. We systematically searched four online databases, identifying 38 relevant articles for inclusion, which were then evaluated across eight domains following PRISMA guidelines. The analysis indicates a steady increase in TGM-focused research within physical education, particularly at the K-12 level. However, there is a notable absence of studies addressing higher education, as well as teachers and coaches. The review also found that the majority of TGM research is concentrated on team sports and invasion games, with limited exploration of other sports. The research objectives often centred on extrinsic factors, such as game performance, skill level, and physical activity (PA) level, as well as intrinsic factors, intrinsic motivation, stress, and enjoyment. The TGM has shown varying levels of success in improving these factors. Despite the recognised benefits of TGM in physical education, its impact on cognitive aspects and decision-making remains underexplored. This systematic review may serve as a valuable resource for educators and researchers, supporting the broader application of TGM across different areas of physical education and potentially leading to enhanced student outcomes.
自 Oslin、Griffin 和 Mitchell 采用并推广战术游戏模式(TGM)以来,人们对该模式的研究兴趣大增,其在教学和研究中的应用也越来越广泛。然而,现有的许多研究都是零散的,缺乏全面的综述。本系统评价旨在通过深入分析体育教育背景下的 TGM 文献,突出当前的趋势和发展,填补这一空白。我们系统地检索了四个在线数据库,确定了 38 篇相关文章纳入本研究,然后按照 PRISMA 指南对这 38 篇文章进行了八项内容的评估。分析表明,TGM 在体育教育中的研究稳步增加,特别是在 K-12 阶段。然而,在高等教育、教师和教练方面的研究却明显缺失。本综述还发现,大多数 TGM 研究集中在团队运动和入侵性游戏上,对其他运动的探索有限。研究目标通常集中在外部因素,如游戏表现、技能水平和身体活动(PA)水平,以及内在因素,如内在动机、压力和享受。TGM 在提高这些因素方面取得了不同程度的成功。尽管 TGM 在体育教育中具有公认的益处,但它对认知方面和决策制定的影响仍未得到充分探索。本系统评价可能为教育工作者和研究人员提供有价值的资源,支持 TGM 在体育教育不同领域的更广泛应用,并可能带来学生学习成果的提升。