文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经口粪传播的 SARS-CoV-2:对从胃肠道和其他潜在经口粪传播源分离病毒培养的研究进行系统评价,以及证明可传播给人类的证据。

Oro-faecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review of studies employing viral culture from gastrointestinal and other potential oro-faecal sources and evidence for transmission to humans.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141Milan, Italy.

Departments of Medicine, Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Synder Institute for Chronic Diseases and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Nov 12;152:e138. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001481.


DOI:10.1017/S0950268824001481
PMID:39529596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574600/
Abstract

The extent to which the oro-faecal route contributes to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is not established.We systematically reviewed the evidence on the presence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in faeces and other gastrointestinal sources by examining studies that used viral culture to investigate the presence of replication-competent virus in these samples. We conducted searches in the WHO COVID-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, and Google Scholar for SARS-CoV-2 using keywords and associated synonyms, with a search date up to 28 November 2023.We included 13 studies involving 229 COVID-19 subjects - providing 308 faecal or rectal swab SARS-CoV2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive samples tested with viral culture. The methods used for viral culture across the studies were heterogeneous. Three studies (two cohorts and one case series) reported observing replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) and whole-genome sequencing, and qPCR including appropriate cycle threshold changes. Overall, six (1.9%) of 308 faecal samples subjected to cell culture showed replication-competent virus. One study found replication-competent samples from one immunocompromised patient. No studies were identified demonstrating direct evidence of oro-faecal transmission to humans.Our review found a relatively low frequency of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 in faecal and other gastrointestinal sources. Although it is biologically plausible, more research is needed using standardized cell culture methods, control groups, adequate follow-up, and robust epidemiologic methods, including whether secondary infections occurred, to determine the role of the oro-faecal route in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

摘要

肠道-口途径在 SARS-CoV-2 传播中的作用程度尚未确定。我们通过检查使用病毒培养来研究这些样本中复制型病毒存在的研究,系统地回顾了粪便和其他胃肠道来源中存在传染性 SARS-CoV-2 的证据。我们使用关键字和相关同义词在世界卫生组织 COVID-19 数据库、LitCovid、medRxiv 和 Google Scholar 中对 SARS-CoV-2 进行了搜索,搜索日期截至 2023 年 11 月 28 日。我们纳入了 13 项涉及 229 名 COVID-19 受试者的研究-提供了 308 个粪便或直肠拭子 SARS-CoV2 逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)阳性样本,用病毒培养进行了测试。研究中使用的病毒培养方法存在异质性。三项研究(两项队列研究和一项病例系列研究)报告观察到复制型 SARS-CoV-2 通过定量 RT-PCR(qPCR)和全基因组测序证实,以及包括适当循环阈值变化的 qPCR。总体而言,308 个接受细胞培养的粪便样本中,有 6 个(1.9%)显示出复制型病毒。一项研究发现了来自一名免疫功能低下患者的复制型样本。没有研究证明直接证据表明肠道-口途径向人类传播。我们的综述发现,粪便和其他胃肠道来源中具有复制型 SARS-CoV-2 的频率相对较低。尽管从生物学角度来看是合理的,但需要使用标准化的细胞培养方法、对照组、充分的随访和稳健的流行病学方法进行更多研究,包括是否发生继发感染,以确定肠道-口途径在 SARS-CoV-2 传播中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4125/11574600/fcd4a0d40589/S0950268824001481_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4125/11574600/fcd4a0d40589/S0950268824001481_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4125/11574600/fcd4a0d40589/S0950268824001481_fig1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Oro-faecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review of studies employing viral culture from gastrointestinal and other potential oro-faecal sources and evidence for transmission to humans.

Epidemiol Infect. 2024-11-12

[2]
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-16

[3]
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17

[4]
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-14

[5]
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22

[6]
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-30

[7]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[8]
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-17

[9]
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-6

[10]
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-16

本文引用的文献

[1]
Viral emissions into the air and environment after SARS-CoV-2 human challenge: a phase 1, open label, first-in-human study.

Lancet Microbe. 2023-8

[2]
Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Particles from Rectal Swab Samples from COVID-19 Patients in Brazil.

Viruses. 2023-5-11

[3]
Intestinal Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in Children: No Evidence for Infectious Potential.

Microorganisms. 2022-12-22

[4]
Viral cultures, cycle threshold values and viral load estimation for assessing SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness in haematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant patients: a systematic review.

J Hosp Infect. 2023-2

[5]
School reopening: Back to classroom. A systematic review of strategies and their implementation during COVID-19 pandemic.

J Family Med Prim Care. 2022-8

[6]
Lack of evidence of viability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in the fecal specimens of COVID-19 patients.

Front Public Health. 2022

[7]
Viral cultures for assessing fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Hosp Infect. 2022-12

[8]
A Hierarchical Framework for Assessing Transmission Causality of Respiratory Viruses.

Viruses. 2022-7-22

[9]
A network meta-analysis of secondary attack rates of COVID-19 in different contact environments.

Epidemiol Infect. 2021-10-5

[10]
Excretion and viability of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and its association with the clinical outcome of COVID-19.

Sci Rep. 2022-5-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索