• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用移动医疗技术进行癌症护理和研究中的远程患者监测:患者的观点和偏好。

Remote Patient Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology in Cancer Care and Research: Patients' Views and Preferences.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Nov;8:e2400092. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00092. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00092
PMID:39531613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11573098/
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is an increasing interest in studying the potential of mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as smartphone apps and wearables, as monitoring tools for patients with cancer during or after their treatment. However, little research is dedicated to exploring the opinions and concerns of patients regarding the adoption of these technologies. This study aimed to gain insight into patients' perspectives and preferences for participating in mHealth-based monitoring in cancer care.

METHODS

A qualitative study comprising semistructured interviews was conducted in the Netherlands between April and June 2023. Participants were eligible if they were 18 years or older with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. The interview guide was developed on the basis of the technology acceptance model, with main themes being use, communication, trust, privacy, and expectations.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants with urologic primary cancer were interviewed. Most patients had already some familiarity with the use of digital monitoring devices or wearables. Main barriers included persistent reminders of the illness, receiving notifications deemed unnecessary or unwanted, and the acknowledgment that mHealth technology does not serve as a substitute for human doctors. Conversely, patients recognized the potential for time-savings through the utilization of mHealth, viewed active monitoring as nonburdensome, considered mHealth a tool for reducing the communication threshold with their doctor, and expressed willingness to adopt such a platform if they perceived personal or societal relevance.

CONCLUSION

This study has elucidated which factors are important for successful development of mHealth for patients with cancer. While both barriers and facilitators play a role, patients' attitudes were positive toward the implementation of remote digital monitoring, showing promising prospects for future research of mHealth in oncology.

摘要

目的

人们越来越关注将移动健康(mHealth)技术,如智能手机应用程序和可穿戴设备,作为癌症患者治疗期间或治疗后的监测工具的潜力。然而,很少有研究致力于探索患者对采用这些技术的意见和担忧。本研究旨在深入了解患者对参与癌症护理中基于 mHealth 的监测的看法和偏好。

方法

2023 年 4 月至 6 月,在荷兰进行了一项包含半结构化访谈的定性研究。参与者须符合以下条件:年龄在 18 岁或以上,目前或过去患有癌症。访谈指南是基于技术接受模型制定的,主要主题包括使用、沟通、信任、隐私和期望。

结果

对 13 名患有泌尿系统原发性癌症的患者进行了访谈。大多数患者已经对使用数字监测设备或可穿戴设备有一定的熟悉度。主要障碍包括持续提醒疾病的存在、接收被认为不必要或不想要的通知,以及认识到 mHealth 技术不能替代人类医生。相反,患者认识到通过使用 mHealth 可以节省时间,认为主动监测无负担,认为 mHealth 是降低与医生沟通门槛的工具,并表示如果他们认为个人或社会相关,愿意采用这样的平台。

结论

本研究阐明了哪些因素对癌症患者成功开发 mHealth 至关重要。虽然障碍和促进因素都发挥了作用,但患者对远程数字监测的实施持积极态度,为未来肿瘤学中 mHealth 的研究展现了广阔的前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/11573098/e640ba27dc7a/cci-8-e2400092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/11573098/301ef4c55c17/cci-8-e2400092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/11573098/e640ba27dc7a/cci-8-e2400092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/11573098/301ef4c55c17/cci-8-e2400092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/11573098/e640ba27dc7a/cci-8-e2400092-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Remote Patient Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology in Cancer Care and Research: Patients' Views and Preferences.利用移动医疗技术进行癌症护理和研究中的远程患者监测:患者的观点和偏好。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Nov;8:e2400092. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00092. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.患者和利益相关者对沙特阿拉伯通过移动健康应用程序收集的数据的隐私、安全和保密性的看法:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933.
3
Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study.全科医生对开具移动健康应用程序处方的态度:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795. doi: 10.2196/21795.
4
Perspectives and Needs of Malaysian Patients With Diabetes for a Mobile Health App Support on Self-Management of Diabetes: Qualitative Study.马来西亚糖尿病患者对支持糖尿病自我管理的移动健康应用程序的看法和需求:定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Oct 23;8:e40968. doi: 10.2196/40968.
5
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Prescription of mHealth Apps in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study.澳大利亚全科医疗中移动医疗应用程序处方的障碍和促进因素:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 30;8(7):e17447. doi: 10.2196/17447.
6
Patients' Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.患者对移动医疗应用程序的数据保密性、隐私性和安全性的看法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e50715. doi: 10.2196/50715.
7
Healthcare professionals' and patients' assessments of listed mobile health apps in China: a qualitative study.中国医疗保健专业人员和患者对已上市移动医疗应用程序的评估:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1220160. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1220160. eCollection 2023.
8
Evidence of How Physicians and Their Patients Adopt mHealth Apps in Germany: Exploratory Qualitative Study.德国医生及其患者采用移动医疗应用程序的证据:探索性定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 17;12:e48345. doi: 10.2196/48345.
9
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
10
mHealth Apps for Hypertension Self-Management: Interview Study Among Patient-Users.移动医疗应用程序在高血压自我管理中的应用:基于患者用户的访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 27;8:e56162. doi: 10.2196/56162.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote monitoring in older adults with cancer, opportunities and challenges: a narrative review.老年癌症患者的远程监测:机遇与挑战——一篇叙述性综述
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Aug 20;37(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03161-x.
2
AI and Smart Devices in Cardio-Oncology: Advancements in Cardiotoxicity Prediction and Cardiovascular Monitoring.心脏肿瘤学中的人工智能与智能设备:心脏毒性预测和心血管监测的进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;15(6):787. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060787.
3
Current status and influencing factors of nutrition management in patients with digestive tract cancer from the integrated perspective of medical care staff, patients, and family caregivers: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Key Issues as Wearable Digital Health Technologies Enter Clinical Care.可穿戴数字健康技术进入临床护理的关键问题。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 21;390(12):1118-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2307160.
2
Smartphone-Based Passive Sensing in Monitoring Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review.基于智能手机的被动感知在监测癌症患者中的应用:系统评价。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300141. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00141.
3
Features of Cancer mHealth Apps and Evidence for Patient Preferences: Scoping Literature Review.癌症移动健康应用程序的特点及患者偏好证据:范围性文献综述
从医护人员、患者及家庭照护者综合视角看消化道癌症患者营养管理的现状及影响因素:一项定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 21;33(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09109-7.
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Apr 28;9:e37330. doi: 10.2196/37330.
4
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews.数字健康和远程医疗在癌症护理中的应用:系统评价综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e316-e327. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3.
5
Benefits and Barriers of Technology for Home Function and Mobility Assessment: Perspectives of Older Patients With Blood Cancers, Caregivers, and Clinicians.技术在居家功能和移动性评估方面的益处和障碍:老年血液癌症患者、照护者和临床医生的观点。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Apr;7:e2200171. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00171.
6
How the use of an online healthcare community affects the doctor-patient relationship: An empirical study in China.在线医疗社区的使用如何影响医患关系:来自中国的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 6;11:1145749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145749. eCollection 2023.
7
The association between wearable device metrics and clinical outcomes in oncology: A systematic review with evidence synthesis and meta-analysis.可穿戴设备指标与肿瘤学临床结局之间的关联:一项证据综合与荟萃分析的系统评价
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023 May;185:103979. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103979. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review.使用实施研究综合框架评估癌症护理中移动健康应用程序采用的障碍和促进因素:范围综述文献
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Mar 30;9:e42092. doi: 10.2196/42092.
9
Disparities and Trends in Genitourinary Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the USA.美国泌尿生殖系统癌症发病率和死亡率的差异和趋势。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.023. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
10
A Narrative Review on the Collection and Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Survivorship Care with Emphasis on Symptom Monitoring.电子患者报告结局在癌症生存者照护中的采集和应用述评,重点关注症状监测。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jun 17;29(6):4370-4385. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29060349.