Department of Psychology, Western Washington University.
Department of Psychology, Macalester College.
Am Psychol. 2024 Nov;79(8):999-1011. doi: 10.1037/amp0001260.
Although current approaches to the study of resilience acknowledge the role of context, rarely do those conceptualizations attend to societal systems and structures that include hierarchies of power and privilege-namely systems of racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and capitalism-nor do they articulate how these structural realities are embedded within individual experiences. We offer critiques of the current literature from this structural lens, using the concept of master narratives to articulate the incomplete and, at times, damaging story that the discipline of psychology has told about resilience. We then provide three models that center history, systems, and structures of society that can be employed in the study of resilience. We close with lessons learned from listening to those voices who have been marginalized by mainstream society, lessons that require us to redefine, broaden, and deepen our conceptualization of resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然当前关于韧性的研究方法承认了背景的作用，但这些概念很少关注包括权力和特权等级制度的社会系统和结构——即种族主义、殖民主义、父权制和资本主义系统——也没有阐明这些结构现实是如何嵌入个人经历中的。我们从这个结构角度对当前文献进行了批判，使用主叙事的概念来表达心理学学科讲述的关于韧性的不完整的、有时甚至是有害的故事。然后，我们提供了三个以历史、社会系统和结构为中心的模型，可用于韧性研究。最后，我们从倾听那些被主流社会边缘化的人的声音中吸取了教训，这些教训要求我们重新定义、拓宽和深化我们对韧性的概念化。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2024 APA，保留所有权利）。
