Suppr超能文献

外科病房的连续生命体征监测:COSMOS 试验。

Continuous vital sign monitoring on surgical wards: The COSMOS pilot.

机构信息

Research Fellow, OutcomesResearch Consortium, Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Staff Biostatistician, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, OutcomesResearch Consortium, Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111661. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111661. Epub 2024 Nov 11.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Alerts for vital sign abnormalities seek to identify meaningful patient instability while limiting alarm fatigue. Optimal vital sign alarm settings for postoperative patients remain unknown, as is whether alerts lead to effective clinical responses reducing vital sign disturbances. We conducted a 2-phase pilot study to identify thresholds and delays and test the hypothesis that alerts from continuous monitoring reduce the duration of vital sign abnormalities.

DESIGN

Two-phase pilot.

PATIENTS

250 adults having major non-cardiac surgery.

SETTING

Surgical wards.

INTERVENTION

All patients had routine vital sign monitoring by nurses at 4-h intervals. We initially continuously recorded clinician-blinded saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate in 100 patients. In the second phase, we randomized 150 patients to blinded versus unblinded continuous vital sign monitoring. In unblinded patients, nurses were verbally alerted to abnormal vital signs.

MEASUREMENTS

In the first phase, we modeled expected alarm counts using 6082 h of continuous oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate data. Thresholds and delays targeting ∼3 alarms per patient per day were selected for phase two. Primary analysis assessed the effect of unblinded monitoring across a 5-component primary composite of cumulative durations of vital sign abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included fraction of alerts deemed meaningful by nurses and number of clinical interventions.

RESULTS

In phase one, we identified alarm settings that yielded an average of 2.3 alerts per patient per day. In phase two, the average relative effect ratio of geometric duration means for vital signs exceeding thresholds was 0.75 [95 % CI: 0.51, 1.1], P = 0.17. Sixty alarms (82 %) were deemed useful in unblinded patients, leading to 60 % more interventions in unblinded patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to select continuous saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate thresholds that generated about 2 alerts per patient per day, nearly all of which were considered useful by nurses. Unblinded monitoring and nursing alerts led to interventions (mostly increasing oxygen delivery) that non-significantly reduced vital sign abnormalities by 25 %.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov registration: NCT05280574.

摘要

研究目的

生命体征异常警报旨在识别有意义的患者不稳定情况,同时限制警报疲劳。术后患者最佳生命体征警报设置仍不清楚,也不清楚警报是否会导致有效临床反应,从而减少生命体征干扰。我们进行了一项两阶段试点研究,以确定阈值和延迟,并测试以下假设:来自连续监测的警报可减少生命体征异常的持续时间。

设计

两阶段试点。

患者

250 名接受非心脏大手术的成年人。

设置

外科病房。

干预措施

所有患者均由护士每 4 小时进行常规生命体征监测。我们最初连续记录了 100 名患者的临床医生盲饱和度、心率和呼吸率。在第二阶段,我们将 150 名患者随机分为盲法和非盲法连续生命体征监测。在非盲法患者中,护士会因异常生命体征而口头发出警报。

测量

在第一阶段,我们使用 6082 小时的连续血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸率数据对预期警报次数进行建模。为第二阶段选择了针对每天每位患者约 3 次警报的阈值和延迟。主要分析评估了非盲监测对 5 个主要复合累积生命体征异常持续时间的影响。次要结局包括护士认为有意义的警报比例和临床干预次数。

结果

在第一阶段,我们确定了警报设置,使每位患者每天平均发出 2.3 次警报。在第二阶段,超过阈值的生命体征几何平均持续时间的平均相对效应比为 0.75[95%CI:0.51,1.1],P=0.17。在非盲法患者中,有 60 次警报(82%)被认为有用,导致非盲法患者的干预措施增加了 60%。

结论

我们能够选择连续血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸率阈值,使每位患者每天产生约 2 次警报,几乎所有警报都被护士认为有用。非盲监测和护士警报导致干预措施(主要是增加氧气输送),非显著地减少了 25%的生命体征异常。

临床试验

gov 注册:NCT05280574。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验