Nazar Nazia, Saxena Akanksha, Sebastian Anu, Slater Adrian, Sundaresan Velusamy, Sgamma Tiziana
Biomolecular Technology Group, Leicester School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Plant Biology and Systematics, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Research Centre, Bengaluru, India.
Phytochem Anal. 2025 Jan;36(1):7-29. doi: 10.1002/pca.3466. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Existing methods for morphological, organoleptic, and chemical authentication may not adequately ensure the accurate identification of plant species or guarantee safety. Herbal raw material authentication remains a major challenge in herbal medicine. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding, combined with an orthogonal approach integrating various testing methods for quality assurance, has emerged as a new trend in plant authentication.
The review evaluates DNA barcoding and common alternative testing in plant-related sectors to enhance quality assurance and accurate authentication.
Studies were selected based on their relevance to the identification, quality assurance, and safety of herbal products. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, and relevant case studies from the last two decades focused on DNA barcoding, identification methods, and their applications. Exclusion criteria involved studies lacking empirical data, those not peer-reviewed, or those unrelated to the main focus. This ensured the inclusion of high-quality, pertinent sources while excluding less relevant studies.
An orthogonal approach refers to the use of multiple, independent methods that provide complementary information for more accurate plant identification and quality assurance. This reduces false positives or negatives by confirming results through different techniques, combining DNA barcoding with morphological analysis or chemical profiling. It enhances confidence in results, particularly in cases of potential adulteration or misidentification of plant materials.
This study highlights the persistent challenges in assuring the quality, purity, and safety of plant materials. Additionally, it stresses the importance of incorporating DNA-based authentication alongside traditional methods, to enhance plant material identification.
现有的形态学、感官和化学鉴别方法可能无法充分确保准确鉴定植物物种或保证安全性。草药原料鉴别仍然是草药医学中的一项重大挑战。在过去十年中,DNA条形码技术,结合整合各种质量保证测试方法的正交方法,已成为植物鉴别的新趋势。
本综述评估了DNA条形码技术以及植物相关领域中常见的替代测试方法,以加强质量保证和准确鉴别。
根据研究与草药产品的鉴定、质量保证和安全性的相关性来选择研究。纳入标准为同行评审文章、系统评价以及过去二十年中专注于DNA条形码技术、鉴定方法及其应用的相关案例研究。排除标准包括缺乏实证数据的研究、未经同行评审的研究或与主要重点无关的研究。这确保纳入高质量、相关的资料来源,同时排除相关性较低的研究。
正交方法是指使用多种独立方法,这些方法提供互补信息以实现更准确的植物鉴定和质量保证。通过不同技术确认结果,将DNA条形码技术与形态分析或化学分析相结合,减少假阳性或假阴性。它增强了对结果的信心,特别是在植物材料可能掺假或误认的情况下。
本研究突出了在确保植物材料的质量、纯度和安全性方面持续存在的挑战。此外,它强调了将基于DNA的鉴别方法与传统方法相结合以加强植物材料鉴定的重要性。