McKinlay Eileen, Burrow Marla, Morgan Sonya
Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
School of Nursing, Massey University, Palmerston North, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Nov 13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02540-8.
In interprofessional education (IPE) patients with cancer are sometimes recruited to support passive forms of learning but do not seem to have been recruited as expert patients (EPs). The aim of the study was to explore the experiences of patients who acted as EPs in an IPE learning activity in Aotearoa New Zealand. These EPs were completing or had completed receiving radiation therapy as outpatients. Ten EPs were interviewed about their experiences of being interviewed by small interprofessional groups of senior pre-registration students. Four themes were identified: (1) Why EPs decided to take part; (2) EPs' perceptions of the primary purpose of the IPE; (3) EPs' experiences of the interview, and (4) What EPs felt they contributed to student learning or learned about themselves or from students. EPs also made suggestions about how the learning activity could be improved. The study showed EPs felt they had something important to contribute to student learning. They thought the interprofessional nature of the learning activity was uncontentious and took part because they wanted students of all disciplines to learn about what it is like to have cancer and having treatment. The EPs felt the students were well-prepared and professional in their approach. They pointed out the importance of students introducing themselves proficiently and in culturally appropriate ways as this made them relax, open up, and share their experiences and in some cases learn from the students and from themselves. Patients are willing to act as EPs, but selection and approach need careful consideration.
在跨专业教育(IPE)中,癌症患者有时会被招募来支持被动学习形式,但似乎并未被招募为专家患者(EPs)。本研究的目的是探索在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的一次IPE学习活动中担任专家患者的患者的经历。这些专家患者正在或已经完成了门诊放疗。10名专家患者接受了访谈,内容是关于他们被高级预注册学生的跨专业小组访谈的经历。确定了四个主题:(1)专家患者决定参与的原因;(2)专家患者对IPE主要目的的看法;(3)专家患者的访谈经历;(4)专家患者认为他们对学生学习有何贡献,或对自己有何了解,或从学生身上学到了什么。专家患者还就如何改进学习活动提出了建议。研究表明,专家患者觉得他们对学生学习有重要贡献。他们认为学习活动的跨专业性质无可争议,参与是因为他们希望所有学科的学生了解患癌症和接受治疗是什么样的。专家患者觉得学生准备充分且态度专业。他们指出学生以熟练且符合文化习惯的方式自我介绍很重要,因为这能让他们放松、敞开心扉并分享经历,在某些情况下还能从学生和自己身上学到东西。患者愿意担任专家患者,但选择和方式需要仔细考虑。