• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于上下文的记忆搜索中协作抑制模型。

A context-based model of collaborative inhibition during memory search.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, 08854, USA.

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, 08854, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78517-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-78517-w
PMID:39532935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558009/
Abstract

Contrary to common intuition, a group of people recalling information together remembers less than the same number of individuals recalling alone (i.e., the collaborative inhibition effect). To understand this effect in a free recall task, we build a computational model of collaborative recall in groups, extended from the Context Maintenance and Retrieval (CMR) model, which captures how individuals recall information alone. We propose that in collaborative recall, one not only uses their previous recall as an internal retrieval cue, but one also listens to someone else's recall and uses it as an external retrieval cue. Attending to this cue updates the listener's context to be more similar to the context of someone else's recall. Over an existing dataset of individual and collaborative recall in small and large groups, we show that our model successfully captures the difference in memory performance between individual recall and collaborative recall across different group sizes from 2 to 16, as well as additional recall patterns such as recency effects and semantic clustering effects. Our model further shows that collaborating individuals reach similar areas in the context space, whereby their contexts converge more than the contexts of individuals recalling alone. This convergence constrains their ability to search memories effectively and is negatively associated with recall performance. We discuss the contributions of our modeling results in relation to previous accounts of the collaborative inhibition effect.

摘要

与普遍的直觉相反,一群人一起回忆信息比相同数量的个体单独回忆(即协同抑制效应)记得的信息少。为了在自由回忆任务中理解这种效应,我们构建了一个群体协同回忆的计算模型,该模型扩展了上下文维护和检索(CMR)模型,该模型捕获了个体如何单独回忆信息。我们提出,在协同回忆中,人们不仅使用他们之前的回忆作为内部检索线索,还会听取其他人的回忆并将其作为外部检索线索。关注这个线索会更新听者的上下文,使其更类似于他人回忆的上下文。在一个包含个人和群体协同回忆的现有数据集上,我们的模型成功地捕捉到了不同群体大小(从 2 到 16)下个人回忆和群体协同回忆之间的记忆表现差异,以及其他回忆模式,如近因效应和语义聚类效应。我们的模型进一步表明,协作的个体在上下文空间中达到相似的区域,从而使他们的上下文比单独回忆的个体的上下文更趋同。这种收敛限制了他们有效搜索记忆的能力,并与回忆表现呈负相关。我们讨论了我们的建模结果对协同抑制效应的先前解释的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/31fc80926352/41598_2024_78517_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/fc5c5dcc5256/41598_2024_78517_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/a84905dc6960/41598_2024_78517_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/97b0ac723679/41598_2024_78517_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/60a23f899fad/41598_2024_78517_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/419aeeee550f/41598_2024_78517_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/31fc80926352/41598_2024_78517_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/fc5c5dcc5256/41598_2024_78517_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/a84905dc6960/41598_2024_78517_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/97b0ac723679/41598_2024_78517_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/60a23f899fad/41598_2024_78517_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/419aeeee550f/41598_2024_78517_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11558009/31fc80926352/41598_2024_78517_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A context-based model of collaborative inhibition during memory search.基于上下文的记忆搜索中协作抑制模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78517-w.
2
Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.协同抑制效应:记忆任务和提取方法的作用。
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2548-2558. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01821-z. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
3
Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.为何分头行动比共同行动更胜一筹:记忆中的协同抑制效应存在多种机制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):559-66. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000037. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
4
Memory transmission in small groups and large networks: An empirical study.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):581-588. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02021-9. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Collaborative inhibition in spatial memory retrieval.空间记忆检索中的协同抑制
Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):876-85. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0407-0.
6
The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.多次试验和计算机介导的交流对协作及个体语义回忆的影响。
Memory. 2018 Apr;26(4):415-423. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1354997. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
7
Features of Successful and Unsuccessful Collaborative Memory Conversations in Long-Married Couples.成功与不成功的长期已婚夫妇协作记忆对话的特征。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;11(4):668-686. doi: 10.1111/tops.12350. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.通过类别聚类回忆增强个体及协作性目击者记忆。
Memory. 2018 Sep;26(8):1128-1139. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1432058. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.探讨协作中断检索与回忆之间的关系。
Memory. 2011 Jul;19(5):462-9. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.584389. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.再探协同记忆:研究情境的可及性调节协同抑制及对个体记忆的后续益处。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1319-1334. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0737-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling collaborative memory with SAM.使用SAM对协作记忆进行建模。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1245-1258. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01647-z. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.宾夕法尼亚州编码和检索研究的电生理学研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Sep;50(9):1421-1443. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001319. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Improving Memory Search Through Model-Based Cue Selection.
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;35(1):55-71. doi: 10.1177/09567976231215298. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
The modulation and elimination of temporal organization in free recall.自由回忆中时间组织的调节与消除
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Jul;50(7):1035-1068. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001311. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Memory transmission in small groups and large networks: An empirical study.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):581-588. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02021-9. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Serial memory: Putting chains and position codes in context.序列记忆:将链条和位置编码置于情境中。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;128(6):1197-1205. doi: 10.1037/rev0000327. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
7
Part-list cuing with prose material: When cuing is detrimental and when it is not.部分列表提示与散文材料:提示何时有害,何时无害。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104427. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104427. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
8
Part-list cuing can impair, improve, or not influence recall performance: The critical roles of encoding and access to study context at test.部分列表提示可能会损害、改善或不影响回忆表现:编码和在测试时获取学习情境的关键作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Aug;44(8):1186-1200. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000517. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis.协作抑制和协作后记忆的元分析综述:检验检索策略干扰假说的预测。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Nov;142(11):1141-1164. doi: 10.1037/bul0000071. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
10
Memory Transmission in Small Groups and Large Networks: An Agent-Based Model.小群体和大型网络中的记忆传递:基于主体的模型
Psychol Sci. 2015 Dec;26(12):1909-17. doi: 10.1177/0956797615605798. Epub 2015 Nov 9.