Timoteo Thiago Ferreira, Debien Paula Barreiros, Fonseca Diogo Simões, Felício Diogo Carvalho, Bara Filho Mauricio Gattás
Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Physiotherapy Salgado de Oliveira University Center, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sports Health. 2025 Jan-Feb;17(1):104-110. doi: 10.1177/19417381241293771. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
Many questions persist regarding the relationship between training load and injuries in volleyball, as well as the best method for calculating acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between different metrics of training load and risk of injury in male professional volleyball players.
ACWR, as a training load measure, is useful for identifying injury risk in volleyball players, regardless of calculation method.
Longitudinal, prospective, and observational design conducted over 3 seasons of professional male volleyball.
Level 3.
The study included 43 male volleyball players. Internal training load was quantified using the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion. From daily training load values, absolute measures and relative measures were computed. For relative measures, 7 days were employed for acute training load, and 21 and 28 days for chronic training load. A distinction was made between coupled calculation and uncoupled calculation. Injuries were documented using the Injury Surveillance Form proposed by the International Volleyball Federation.
ACWR calculated in a coupled manner and by a rolling average demonstrated higher injury risks when analyzing the complete periods (odds ratio [OR] ACWR 7:28 = 2.040; ACWR 7:21 = 1.980) and competitive period (OR ACWR 7:28 = 2.044; ACWR 7:21 = 2.087). In contrast, during the preseason, the coupled exponential averages were more sensitive to the risk of injury (OR ACWR 7:28 = 4.370; ACWR 7.504).
Both measures using rolling averages and those calculated from exponential averages can be employed to identify the risk of injuries in volleyball athletes.
The findings of this study can be useful to coaching staff, fitness trainers, and healthcare professionals involved in the challenge of reducing the risk of injury in volleyball athletes. The need for continuous monitoring and real-time adjustments of training load is emphasized.
关于排球运动中训练负荷与伤病之间的关系,以及计算急性:慢性工作量比值(ACWR)的最佳方法,仍存在许多问题。本研究旨在调查男性职业排球运动员不同训练负荷指标与受伤风险之间的关系。
作为一种训练负荷测量指标,无论计算方法如何,ACWR都有助于识别排球运动员的受伤风险。
对职业男子排球三个赛季进行的纵向、前瞻性观察性设计。
3级。
本研究纳入43名男性排球运动员。使用主观用力感觉评分(Session Rating of Perceived Exertion)对内部训练负荷进行量化。从每日训练负荷值中计算出绝对指标和相对指标。对于相对指标,急性训练负荷采用7天的数据,慢性训练负荷采用21天和28天的数据。区分了耦合计算和非耦合计算。使用国际排球联合会提出的伤病监测表记录伤病情况。
在分析整个赛季(比值比[OR],ACWR 7:28 = 2.040;ACWR 7:21 = 1.980)和比赛期(OR,ACWR 7:28 = 2.044;ACWR 7:21 = 2.087)时,以耦合方式和移动平均值计算的ACWR显示出更高的受伤风险。相比之下,在季前赛期间,耦合指数平均值对受伤风险更敏感(OR,ACWR 7:28 = 4.370;ACWR 7:504)。
移动平均值法和指数平均值法都可用于识别排球运动员的受伤风险。
本研究结果对参与降低排球运动员受伤风险挑战的教练组、体能教练和医疗保健专业人员可能有用。强调了持续监测和实时调整训练负荷的必要性。