Olive D L, Lee K L
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;154(3):613-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90611-3.
The evaluation of comparative pregnancy data in clinical studies is subject to a variety of biases. One such bias, when treated patients are retrospectively compared with untreated control subjects, results from the fact that treated patients must remain infertile from time of diagnosis to time of treatment while no such requirements is maintained for untreated control subjects. This bias is also apparent when patients undergo sequential treatments and transfer from one comparison group to another. We have eliminated this problem by applying the Mantel-Byar approach for constructing and comparing modified life tables that reflect sequential changes of treatment status. To illustrate this we applied commonly used methods of analysis as well as the Mantel-Byar method to infertile endometriosis patients attempting pregnancy. One hundred thirty consecutive patients were evaluated retrospectively, with 42 undergoing expectant management only, seven experiencing a conservative surgical procedure only, and 81 having a conservative surgical procedure after a variable period of expectant management. Use of Mantel-Byar analysis revealed no significant overall increase in pregnancy rate with conservative surgical procedures versus expectant management (chi 2 = 0.225, df = 1). To further assess the potential value of conservative surgical procedures in fertility enhancement, the data were stratified by degree of endometriosis. The adjusted chi 2 was 1.621. No significant difference was noted between the two therapeutic approaches with mild disease (n = 35, chi 2 = 0.0175) or moderate endometriosis (n = 59, chi 2 = 0.424). Conservative surgical procedures appear to be therapeutic, however, in women with severe disease (n = 36, chi 2 = 5.12, p less than 0.05). These results differed substantially from those obtained with the more biased analytic methods routinely used in clinical fertility trials. This study illustrates the utility of the Mantel-Byar approach as a valuable tool in the evaluation of response time data involving transient therapeutic states and one particularly adaptable to retrospective infertility studies involving sequential treatment approaches.
临床研究中对比较妊娠数据的评估容易受到多种偏差的影响。其中一种偏差是,当对接受治疗的患者与未接受治疗的对照受试者进行回顾性比较时,原因在于接受治疗的患者从诊断到治疗期间必须保持不孕状态,而对未接受治疗的对照受试者则没有这样的要求。当患者接受序贯治疗并从一个比较组转移到另一个比较组时,这种偏差也很明显。我们通过应用Mantel-Byar方法来构建和比较反映治疗状态序贯变化的修正生命表,从而消除了这个问题。为了说明这一点,我们将常用的分析方法以及Mantel-Byar方法应用于尝试妊娠的不孕子宫内膜异位症患者。对130例连续患者进行回顾性评估,其中42例仅接受期待治疗,7例仅接受保守性手术,81例在经过不同时期的期待治疗后接受保守性手术。使用Mantel-Byar分析显示,与期待治疗相比,保守性手术的妊娠率总体上没有显著增加(χ2 = 0.225,自由度 = 1)。为了进一步评估保守性手术在提高生育能力方面的潜在价值,数据按子宫内膜异位症程度进行分层。校正后的χ2为1.621。在轻度疾病(n = 35,χ2 = 0.0175)或中度子宫内膜异位症(n = 59,χ2 = 0.424)患者中,两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异。然而,对于重度疾病患者(n = 36,χ2 = 5.12,p < 0.05),保守性手术似乎具有治疗效果。这些结果与临床生育试验中常规使用的偏差较大的分析方法所获得的结果有很大不同。这项研究说明了Mantel-Byar方法作为一种有价值的工具在评估涉及短暂治疗状态的反应时间数据中的实用性,并且特别适用于涉及序贯治疗方法的回顾性不孕研究。