Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.
Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Science, Engineering, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0310886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310886. eCollection 2024.
Genomic prediction (GP) has been evaluated in durum wheat breeding programs for several years, but prediction accuracy (PA) remains insufficient for some traits. Recently, multivariate (MV) analysis has gained much attention due to its potential to significantly improve PA. In this study, PA was evaluated for several agronomic traits using a univariate (UV) model in durum wheat, subsequently, different multivariate genomic prediction models were performed to attempt to increase PA. The panel was phenotyped for 10 agronomic traits over two consecutive crop seasons and under two different field conditions: high nitrogen and well-watered (HNW), and low nitrogen and rainfed (LNR). Multivariate GP was implemented using two cross-validation (CV) schemes: MV-CV1, testing the model for each target trait using only the markers, and MV-CV2, testing the model for each target trait using additional phenotypic information. These two MV-CVs were applied in two different analyses: modelling the same trait under both HNW and LNR conditions, and modelling grain yield together with the five most genetically correlated traits. PA for all traits in HNW was higher than LNR for the same trait, except for the trait yellow index. Among all traits, PA ranged from 0.34 (NDVI in LNR) to 0.74 (test weight in HNW). In modelling the same traits in both HNW and LNR, MV-CV1 produced improvements in PA up to 12.45% (NDVI in LNR) compared to the univariate model. By contrast, MV-CV2 increased PA up to 56.72% (thousand kernel weight in LNR). The MV-CV1 scheme did not improve PA for grain yield when it was modelled with the five most genetically correlated traits, whereas MV-CV2 significantly improved PA by up to ~18%. This study demonstrated that increases in prediction accuracy for agronomic traits can be achieved by modelling the same traits in two different field conditions using MV-CV2. In addition, the effectiveness of MV-CV2 was established when grain yield was modelled with additional correlated traits.
多年来,基因组预测(GP)已在硬粒小麦育种计划中进行了评估,但某些性状的预测准确性(PA)仍然不足。最近,由于其提高 PA 的潜力,多变量(MV)分析受到了广泛关注。在这项研究中,使用单变量(UV)模型评估了硬粒小麦的几个农艺性状的 PA,随后,进行了不同的多变量基因组预测模型,以试图提高 PA。该小组在两个连续的作物季节和两种不同的田间条件下对 10 个农艺性状进行了表型分析:高氮和充分灌溉(HNW)和低氮和雨养(LNR)。使用两种交叉验证(CV)方案实施多变量 GP:MV-CV1,仅使用标记测试每个目标性状的模型,MV-CV2,使用额外的表型信息测试每个目标性状的模型。这两种 MV-CV 应用于两种不同的分析中:在 HNW 和 LNR 条件下对同一性状建模,以及将谷物产量与五个最具遗传相关性的性状一起建模。在 HNW 下,所有性状的 PA 均高于同一性状的 LNR,除了黄色指数性状。在所有性状中,PA 范围从 0.34(LNR 中的 NDVI)到 0.74(HNW 中的测试重量)。在 HNW 和 LNR 下对同一性状进行建模时,MV-CV1 产生的 PA 提高了 12.45%(LNR 中的 NDVI),与单变量模型相比。相比之下,MV-CV2 将 PA 提高了 56.72%(LNR 中的千粒重)。当将五个最具遗传相关性的性状与谷物产量一起建模时,MV-CV1 方案并未提高 PA,而 MV-CV2 则将 PA 显著提高了高达 18%。这项研究表明,通过使用 MV-CV2 在两种不同的田间条件下对同一性状进行建模,可以提高农艺性状的预测准确性。此外,当用额外的相关性状对产量进行建模时,建立了 MV-CV2 的有效性。