• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村地区机动车创伤受害者的院际直升机转运:延误原因及建议

Rural interhospital helicopter transport of motor vehicle trauma victims: causes for delays and recommendations.

作者信息

Leicht M J, Dula D J, Brotman S, Anderson T E, Gessner H W, Parrish G A, Rose W D

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Apr;15(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80186-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80186-x
PMID:3954181
Abstract

One hundred twenty-six consecutive ACS Category I motor vehicle trauma patients transported by helicopter from 25 hospitals to a regional trauma center in rural Pennsylvania during a 14-month period were reviewed retrospectively. The overall mortality was 13%. Average round-trip distance was 79 miles. Interventions by the medical flight team (emergency physician/nurse) included endotracheal intubation, tube thoracostomy, and/or central venous access in 42 patients (33%) prior to lift-off. Ground time at the referring facility, from landing to lift-off, when no interventions were required of the flight team, averaged 31.2 minutes (baseline). Ground time when major therapeutic interventions were required (principally airway management), however, averaged 57.4 minutes, an 84% increase over baseline (P less than .01). A major cause of the excessive ground times was the lack of standardized diagnostic workup and stabilization of patients prior to arrival of the flight team. Recommendations for standardized emergency department preparation of trauma victims requiring aeromedical evacuation are made.

摘要

回顾性分析了在14个月期间,从宾夕法尼亚州农村地区25家医院通过直升机转运至一家区域创伤中心的126例连续ACS I类机动车创伤患者。总体死亡率为13%。平均往返距离为79英里。医疗飞行团队(急诊医生/护士)在起飞前对42例患者(33%)进行了气管插管、胸腔闭式引流和/或中心静脉置管等干预措施。在无需飞行团队干预时,从降落至起飞,转诊机构的地面停留时间平均为31.2分钟(基线)。然而,在需要进行主要治疗干预(主要是气道管理)时,地面停留时间平均为57.4分钟,比基线增加了84%(P<0.01)。地面停留时间过长的一个主要原因是在飞行团队到达之前缺乏标准化的诊断检查和患者的稳定处理。针对需要航空医疗后送的创伤受害者,提出了急诊科标准化准备的建议。

相似文献

1
Rural interhospital helicopter transport of motor vehicle trauma victims: causes for delays and recommendations.农村地区机动车创伤受害者的院际直升机转运:延误原因及建议
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Apr;15(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80186-x.
2
Physician-staffed helicopter scene response from a rural trauma center.来自农村创伤中心的由医生配备的直升机现场响应。
Ann Emerg Med. 1987 Jan;16(1):58-61. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80288-3.
3
Helicopter use by rural emergency departments to transfer trauma victims: a study of time-to-request intervals.农村急诊科使用直升机转运创伤患者:请求间隔时间的研究
Am J Emerg Med. 1989 Jul;7(4):384-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90043-0.
4
Southeast Alaska to Seattle emergency medical air transports: demographics, stabilization, and outcomes.阿拉斯加东南部至西雅图的紧急医疗空中运输:人口统计学、病情稳定情况及结果
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Aug;19(8):914-21. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81570-7.
5
Interfacility transfer of pediatric trauma patients by helicopter does not predict the need for urgent intervention.通过直升机进行儿科创伤患者的机构间转运并不能预测是否需要紧急干预。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jun;29(6):729-36. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318294ddcc.
6
Is helicopter evacuation effective in rural trauma transport?直升机转运在农村创伤患者运输中是否有效?
Am Surg. 2012 Jul;78(7):794-7.
7
Use of a geographic information system to determine appropriate means of trauma patient transport.利用地理信息系统确定创伤患者的合适转运方式。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Nov;6(11):1127-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00115.x.
8
Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: medical and logistical considerations.创伤患者的地面与空中转运:医学及后勤方面的考量
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Dec;15(12):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80950-7.
9
Air transport following surgical stabilization: an extension of regionalized trauma care.手术稳定后的空中转运:区域创伤护理的延伸
J Trauma. 1988 Jun;28(6):794-8.
10
A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene.直升机和地面救护车转运与从现场转运的创伤患者损伤结局之间关联的比较。
J Trauma. 1997 Dec;43(6):940-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse events during rotary-wing transport of mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study.机械通气患者旋翼机转运期间的不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R71. doi: 10.1186/cc6909. Epub 2008 May 22.
2
Fatal motor vehicle crashes in rural and urban areas: decomposing rates into contributing factors.农村和城市地区的致命机动车撞车事故:将发生率分解为促成因素。
Inj Prev. 2005 Feb;11(1):24-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005959.
3
Impact of helicopters on trauma care and clinical results.直升机对创伤护理及临床结果的影响。
Ann Surg. 1988 Dec;208(6):673-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198812000-00001.
4
Interhospital transfers by helicopter: the first 50 patients of the Careflight project.直升机院间转运:Careflight项目的首批50例患者
J R Soc Med. 1992 Jan;85(1):29-31. doi: 10.1177/014107689208500111.
5
The changing perspectives of trauma care. The Sinkler Memorial Lecture.创伤护理观念的转变。辛克勒纪念讲座。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1992 Apr;84(4):321-8.