Suppr超能文献

胞浆内单精子注射与体外受精在低获卵数非男性因素不孕患者中的比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male factor infertility with low oocyte retrieval: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

School of Medical and Life Sciences/Reproductive and Women-Children Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Reproductive and Women-Children Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e080688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080688.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on the clinical outcomes of non-male factor patients aged >35 with three or fewer oocytes retrieved.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Reproductive centre of a university-affiliated hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

547 women with non-male factor infertility who underwent assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment with three or fewer oocytes retrieved were identified from June 2019 to May 2022. Of these 547 patients, 334 were treated with IVF and 213 with ICSI.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were normal fertilisation rate, live birth rate per transfer and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the proportion of primary infertility, which was higher in the ICSI group (17.66% vs 32.86%, p=0.000). Compared with the IVF group, the ICSI group showed higher normal fertilisation rate and lower cycle cancellation rate (65.99% vs 76.56%, p=0.002; 33.53% vs 24.41%, p=0.023). However, no significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (23.86% vs 18.92%, p=0.545), miscarriage rate per fresh embryo transfer (19.05% vs 28.57%, p=0.595), live birth rate per transfer (17.05% vs 13.51%, p=0.623), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval (12.87% vs 11.27%, p=0.576) and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval (9.28% vs 6.57%, p=0.261) between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In non-male factor ART cycles, ICSI was not associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in older women with a low number of oocytes retrieved. Routine use of ICSI is not recommended in older women who are infertile due to non-male factors.

摘要

目的

研究体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)对 3 个或 3 个以下卵母细胞获取的>35 岁非男性因素患者临床结局的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

中国一所大学附属医院的生殖中心。

参与者

2019 年 6 月至 2022 年 5 月,从接受 3 个或 3 个以下卵母细胞获取的辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的 547 名非男性因素不孕患者中确定了 547 名患者,其中 334 名接受 IVF 治疗,213 名接受 ICSI 治疗。

主要结局指标

主要结局指标为正常受精率、每移植活产率和每取卵活产率。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似,除了原发性不孕的比例不同,ICSI 组较高(17.66%比 32.86%,p=0.000)。与 IVF 组相比,ICSI 组的正常受精率较高,周期取消率较低(65.99%比 76.56%,p=0.002;33.53%比 24.41%,p=0.023)。然而,两组每移植临床妊娠率(23.86%比 18.92%,p=0.545)、每新鲜胚胎移植流产率(19.05%比 28.57%,p=0.595)、每移植活产率(17.05%比 13.51%,p=0.623)、每取卵累积临床妊娠率(12.87%比 11.27%,p=0.576)和每取卵累积活产率(9.28%比 6.57%,p=0.261)均无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在非男性因素的 ART 周期中,对于卵母细胞数量少的高龄妇女,ICSI 并不能提高妊娠结局。对于因非男性因素而不孕的高龄妇女,不建议常规使用 ICSI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验