Applied Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47005, Spain.
Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, 03016, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 14;14(1):28062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79565-y.
Immersive virtual reality (VR) is recently being explored as a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of amblyopia. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, safety, usability and satisfaction obtained with the use of a novel VR system (NEIVATECH) to provide binocular vision training in previously treated older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching. A prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, pilot study was conducted in which the intervention under study was 9 h of therapy with the NEIVATECH system, distributed in 18 half-hour sessions spread over 1 month. A comprehensive visual assessment was conducted before and after the intervention, and at the end of the intervention the safety and usability of the system and patient satisfaction were evaluated. After therapy, statistically significant differences were observed in the near best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the dominant (p = 0.022) and non-dominant (p = 0.022) eye, in stereopsis based on the Binocular Function Score (p = 0.045) and in the break (p = 0.012) and recovery (p = 0.009) points of negative fusional vergence for distance vision. The safety and usability of the system and patient satisfaction with the therapy were adequate. These findings support further investigation of this treatment option in future studies incorporating a control group with which to compare the results obtained. Trial registration: NCT04819386.
沉浸式虚拟现实 (VR) 最近被探索作为治疗弱视的替代疗法。本研究旨在评估使用新型 VR 系统 (NEIVATECH) 进行双眼视觉训练的初步疗效、安全性、可用性和满意度,该系统用于治疗对遮盖治疗无反应或不依从的既往治疗的大龄弱视儿童。这是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、单臂、初步研究,研究干预措施为 9 小时的 NEIVATECH 系统治疗,分布在 1 个月内的 18 个半小时疗程中。在干预前后进行全面的视觉评估,在干预结束时评估系统的安全性和可用性以及患者满意度。治疗后,主导眼(p=0.022)和非主导眼(p=0.022)的近视力最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、基于双眼功能评分的立体视(p=0.045)以及负融像性聚散的断点(p=0.012)和恢复点(p=0.009)均有统计学显著差异。系统的安全性和可用性以及患者对治疗的满意度均足够。这些发现支持在未来的研究中进一步探索这种治疗选择,并与对照组进行比较以获得结果。临床试验注册:NCT04819386。