• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对马来西亚低价值医疗干预措施和实践的撤资看法:一项在线调查。

Stakeholders' perspectives on disinvestment of low-value healthcare interventions and practices in Malaysia: an online survey.

机构信息

Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia, Putrajaya.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 15;40(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004665.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324004665
PMID:39544076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11579699/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare disinvestment requires multi-level decision-making, and early stakeholder engagement is essential to facilitate implementation and acceptance. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of Malaysian healthcare stakeholders to disinvestment initiatives as well as identify disinvestment activities in the country.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from February to March 2023 among Malaysian healthcare stakeholders involved in resource allocation and decision-making at various levels of governance. Response frequencies were analyzed descriptively and cross-tabulation was performed for specific questions to compare the responses of different groups of stakeholders. For free-text replies, content analysis was used with each verbatim response examined and assigned a theme.

RESULTS

A total of 153 complete responses were analyzed and approximately 37 percent of participants had prior involvement in disinvestment initiatives. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness ranked as the most important criteria in assessment for disinvestment. Surprisingly, equity was rated the lowest priority despite its crucial role in healthcare decision-making. Almost 90 percent of the respondents concurred that a formal disinvestment framework is necessary and the importance of training for the program's successful implementation. Key obstacles to the adoption of disinvestment include insufficient stakeholder support and political will as well as a lack of expertise in executing the process.

CONCLUSIONS

While disinvestment is perceived as a priority for efficient resource allocation in Malaysian healthcare, there is a lack of a systematic framework for its implementation. Future research should prioritize methodological analysis in healthcare disinvestment and strategies for integrating equity considerations in evaluating disinvestment candidates.

摘要

目的

医疗保健投资削减需要多层次的决策,早期利益相关者的参与对于促进实施和接受至关重要。本研究旨在探讨马来西亚医疗保健利益相关者对投资削减计划的看法,并确定该国的投资削减活动。

方法

2023 年 2 月至 3 月期间,对参与资源分配和各级治理决策的马来西亚医疗保健利益相关者进行了横断面在线调查。对响应频率进行了描述性分析,并对特定问题进行了交叉制表,以比较不同利益相关者群体的响应。对于自由文本回复,使用内容分析法,对每条逐字回复进行了检查并分配了主题。

结果

共分析了 153 份完整回复,约 37%的参与者之前参与过投资削减计划。临床效果和成本效益被评为评估投资削减的最重要标准。令人惊讶的是,尽管公平在医疗保健决策中起着至关重要的作用,但它被评为优先级最低的因素。近 90%的受访者同意需要制定正式的投资削减框架,并认为对该计划的成功实施进行培训非常重要。采用投资削减的主要障碍包括利益相关者支持和政治意愿不足,以及缺乏执行该过程的专业知识。

结论

虽然投资削减被视为马来西亚医疗保健中提高资源配置效率的优先事项,但缺乏实施该计划的系统框架。未来的研究应优先考虑医疗保健投资削减的方法分析和在评估投资削减候选人时纳入公平考虑的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/87b3c8d5b6b9/S0266462324004665_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/ac64171cce40/S0266462324004665_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/f62dfeac6566/S0266462324004665_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/2d81497c9185/S0266462324004665_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/87b3c8d5b6b9/S0266462324004665_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/ac64171cce40/S0266462324004665_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/f62dfeac6566/S0266462324004665_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/2d81497c9185/S0266462324004665_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8848/11579699/87b3c8d5b6b9/S0266462324004665_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholders' perspectives on disinvestment of low-value healthcare interventions and practices in Malaysia: an online survey.利益相关者对马来西亚低价值医疗干预措施和实践的撤资看法:一项在线调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 15;40(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004665.
2
Disinvestment Activities and Candidates in the Health Technology Assessment Community: An Online Survey.卫生技术评估界的撤资活动和候选人:一项在线调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(3):189-194. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000229. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment.ASTUTE 健康研究方案:参与式利益相关者审议,为医疗保健投资削减的实施方法提供信息。
Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 22;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-101.
4
Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices.探讨政策制定者对摒弃无效医疗实践的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Winter;24(1):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307080014.
5
Disinvestment in healthcare: a scoping review of systematic reviews.医疗保健领域的撤资:系统评价的范围综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jul 20;38(1):e69. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000514.
6
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健的可持续性(SHARE)2:确定在当地医疗环境中减少投资的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 5;17(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2211-6.
7
Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 3: examining how resource allocation decisions are made, implemented and evaluated in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健的可持续性(SHARE)3:审视在当地医疗环境中资源分配决策是如何制定、实施和评估的。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 9;17(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2207-2.
8
Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review.阐明医疗保健领域撤资和资源配置决策过程的案例研究:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Apr;29(2):174-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000068. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
9
Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply.探索伊朗卫生技术评估的全貌:利益相关者对需求、需求和供应的看法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 15;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01097-0.
10
Disinvestment in healthcare: an overview of HTA agencies and organizations activities at European level.医疗保健领域的撤资:欧洲层面卫生技术评估机构及组织活动概述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2941-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Investment Decisions and Prioritization of Clinical Programs.医院投资决策与临床项目的优先级排序
Cureus. 2025 Mar 3;17(3):e79998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79998. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Theories, models, and frameworks for de-implementation of low-value care: A scoping review of the literature.低价值医疗服务去实施的理论、模型与框架:文献的范围综述
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Sep 18;1:2633489520953762. doi: 10.1177/2633489520953762. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
National governance of de-implementation of low-value care: a qualitative study in Sweden.国家治理低价值医疗服务的去执行化:瑞典的一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00895-2.
3
How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review.
最不发达国家和中下等收入国家如何使用卫生技术评估:范围综述。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 Mar;117(2):104-119. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2106108. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
4
Choosing Wisely-Barriers and Solutions to Implementation in Low and Middle-Income Countries.明智选择——中低收入国家实施的障碍和解决方案。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 19;29(7):5091-5096. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070403.
5
Disinvestment in healthcare: a scoping review of systematic reviews.医疗保健领域的撤资:系统评价的范围综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jul 20;38(1):e69. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000514.
6
If you were a policymaker, which treatment would you disinvest? A participatory value evaluation on public preferences for active disinvestment of health care interventions in the Netherlands.如果你是决策者,你会放弃哪种治疗方法?荷兰公众对积极放弃医疗干预措施的参与式价值评估。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Oct;17(4):428-443. doi: 10.1017/S174413312200010X. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Determinants of the de-implementation of low-value care: a multi-method study.低价值医疗的去执行影响因素:一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07827-4.
8
De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review.取消癌症护理中的低价值医疗服务:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01197-5.
9
To what extent do citizens support the disinvestment of healthcare interventions? An exploration of the support for four viewpoints on active disinvestment in the Netherlands.公民在多大程度上支持医疗干预措施的撤资?对荷兰积极撤资的四种观点的支持程度的探讨。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114662. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114662. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
10
A scoping review of de-implementation frameworks and models.对去实施框架和模型的范围审查。
Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 24;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01173-5.