Ji Hengyi, Xu Yidan, Teng Ganghui
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center for Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing 100083, China.
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center for Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing 100083, China.
Poult Sci. 2025 Jan;104(1):104458. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104458. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Egg production rate and egg weight are core indicators for evaluating the production performance of broiler breeders. The accurate prediction of these indicators can significantly enhance farm economic efficiency and can provide a basis for future production strategies. Currently, there is a lack of research on the application of machine learning (ML) models to predict egg production rate and egg weight in broiler breeders. In this study, we collected data on age, feed intake, water consumption, and environmental factors (temperature, humidity and wind speed) from three poultry houses to train the predictive models. Based on this data, we developed three different datasets. In each dataset, data from a single poultry house were divided into a training set and a validation set in an 8:2 ratio, and data from the remaining two poultry houses were combined to form the test set. We systematically compared the performances of the following seven ML models in predicting egg production rate and egg weight: random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector regression (SVR), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), XGBoost, and LightGBM. The results indicated that the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance across all three datasets. In predicting egg production rate, the XGBoost model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of less than 2.86%, 4.17% and 7.03%, respectively. For egg weight predictions, the XGBoost model's MAE, RMSE and MAPE were less than 0.63g, 0.86g and 1.1%, respectively. Given the inherent black-box nature of ML models, we used the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method to interpret the key features influencing the XGBoost model's predictions and the interactions between these features. The key features for predicting egg production rate are age, feed intake and effective temperature (ET). For egg weight prediction, the most important features are age, wind speed, temperature-humidity index (THI) and ET. This approach enhanced the model's transparency and credibility. This study provides scientific evidence for predicting the production performance of broiler breeders. Accurately predicting egg production rate and egg weight provides a scientific basis for farm operations, aiding in optimizing resource allocation, improving production efficiency, enhancing animal welfare, and ultimately boosting the farm's profitability.
产蛋率和蛋重是评估肉种鸡生产性能的核心指标。准确预测这些指标可显著提高养殖场的经济效益,并可为未来生产策略提供依据。目前,缺乏关于应用机器学习(ML)模型预测肉种鸡产蛋率和蛋重的研究。在本研究中,我们收集了来自三个禽舍的年龄、采食量、饮水量和环境因素(温度、湿度和风速)数据,以训练预测模型。基于这些数据,我们开发了三个不同的数据集。在每个数据集中,单个禽舍的数据按8:2的比例分为训练集和验证集,其余两个禽舍的数据合并形成测试集。我们系统地比较了以下七种ML模型在预测产蛋率和蛋重方面的性能:随机森林(RF)、多层感知器(MLP)、支持向量回归(SVR)、最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)、k近邻(kNN)、XGBoost和LightGBM。结果表明,XGBoost模型在所有三个数据集中表现最佳。在预测产蛋率时,XGBoost模型的平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)分别小于2.86%、4.17%和7.03%。对于蛋重预测,XGBoost模型的MAE、RMSE和MAPE分别小于0.63克、0.86克和1.1%。鉴于ML模型固有的黑箱性质,我们使用夏普利加法解释(SHAP)方法来解释影响XGBoost模型预测的关键特征以及这些特征之间的相互作用。预测产蛋率的关键特征是年龄、采食量和有效温度(ET)。对于蛋重预测,最重要的特征是年龄、风速、温湿度指数(THI)和ET。这种方法提高了模型的透明度和可信度。本研究为预测肉种鸡的生产性能提供了科学依据。准确预测产蛋率和蛋重为养殖场运营提供了科学依据,有助于优化资源配置、提高生产效率、提升动物福利,并最终提高养殖场的盈利能力。