• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重叠双任务中的奖励效应的本地化。

On the localization of reward effects in overlapping dual tasks.

机构信息

Institute for Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 15;89(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02054-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-024-02054-4
PMID:39548026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568026/
Abstract

In dual-task (DT) situations, performance deteriorates compared with single-task situations. Such performance decrements are frequently explained with the serial scheduling of the response selection stages constituting a bottleneck. Proof of this assumption stems from the observation that response times for the second task (task 2; RT 2) increase with decreasing stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA).In this study, we investigated how the reward prospect for task 1 performance affects task 1 and task 2 processing. For that purpose, we relied on the psychological refractory period paradigm (PRP) as a chronometric tool, to determine the locus of the reward effect in the processing chain of both tasks.We obtained improved task 1 and task 2 performance; as indicated by reduced RTs in the reward compared to the no reward condition of task 1 and task 2. Furthermore, the reward effect propagated at short SOA from task 1 onto task 2, suggesting that the locus of the reward effect can be pinpointed before or at the bottleneck of task 1. Importantly, the mean reward effect on task 1 was increased compared to task 2, thus indicating that parts of the reward effect were not propagated onto task 2, therefore affecting task 1 motor processes.In Experiment 2, we tested for the locus of the effect propagation to task 2. Therefore, we implemented a difficulty manipulation of the response selection of task 2. The results indicate that the reward effect is propagated from task 1 onto the response selection stage of task 2.

摘要

在双重任务(DT)情况下,与单任务情况相比,表现会恶化。这种性能下降通常可以用构成瓶颈的响应选择阶段的串行调度来解释。这一假设的证据源于这样一种观察,即第二个任务(任务 2;RT2)的反应时间随着刺激起始时间间隔(SOA)的减少而增加。在这项研究中,我们研究了任务 1 表现的奖励前景如何影响任务 1 和任务 2 的处理。为此,我们依赖心理不应期范式(PRP)作为计时工具,以确定奖励效应对两个任务处理链的影响。我们获得了改进的任务 1 和任务 2 的表现;如任务 1 的奖励条件下的反应时间(RT)比无奖励条件下的 RT 减少所表明的那样。此外,奖励效果从任务 1 传播到任务 2 ,即使在短 SOA 条件下,这表明奖励效果的位置可以在任务 1 的瓶颈之前或处确定。重要的是,与任务 2 相比,任务 1 上的平均奖励效果增加,因此表明部分奖励效果未传播到任务 2,从而影响任务 1 的运动过程。在实验 2 中,我们测试了该效果对任务 2 的传播的位置。因此,我们对任务 2 的响应选择进行了难度操作。结果表明,奖励效果从任务 1 传播到任务 2 的响应选择阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/8708dfd0fb3d/426_2024_2054_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/c19e1592a3fa/426_2024_2054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/dfcc3f585418/426_2024_2054_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/ed4c6e24d9f8/426_2024_2054_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/04afe305e678/426_2024_2054_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/4adf638e953f/426_2024_2054_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/8708dfd0fb3d/426_2024_2054_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/c19e1592a3fa/426_2024_2054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/dfcc3f585418/426_2024_2054_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/ed4c6e24d9f8/426_2024_2054_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/04afe305e678/426_2024_2054_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/4adf638e953f/426_2024_2054_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3521/11568026/8708dfd0fb3d/426_2024_2054_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On the localization of reward effects in overlapping dual tasks.在重叠双任务中的奖励效应的本地化。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 15;89(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02054-4.
2
Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations.重叠双任务情境下奖励效应的研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Feb;222:103465. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103465. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
On the temporal dynamics of reward utilization in dual-task situations.关于双任务情境中奖励利用的时间动态。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1249-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03058-x. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
4
Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.压力提高双任务中的任务处理效率。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.重叠任务中的反应激活与反应选择瓶颈
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):376-97. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.376.
6
Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.采用重叠任务范式研究儿童与青年成年人的双重任务干扰。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104866. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104866. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.视觉、听觉和触觉中的跨模态心理不应期。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1573-1585. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01978-4.
8
Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.响应选择瓶颈处的信息连续性:早期并行的任务2响应激活有助于任务2的公开表现。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):934-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0457-6.
9
Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?双重任务时反应相关干扰的电生理学检查:是运动的还是注意的?
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):660-678. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01261-8. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.双任务中任务优先级的限制研究:来自优先级加工和心理不应期范式的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01250-x. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
On the temporal dynamics of reward utilization in dual-task situations.关于双任务情境中奖励利用的时间动态。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1249-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03058-x. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Fate of the second task in dual-task interference is associated with sensory system interactions with default-mode network.双重任务干扰中第二个任务的命运与感觉系统与默认模式网络的相互作用有关。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:154-171. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations.重叠双任务情境下奖励效应的研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Feb;222:103465. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103465. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.
电生理证据表明,在多任务处理期间不存在平行的运动处理。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Jan;59(1):e13951. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13951. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
4
Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.PRP 范式中的并行和串行任务处理:漂移-扩散模型方法。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1529-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.双任务中任务优先级的限制研究:来自优先级加工和心理不应期范式的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01250-x. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
Mental labour.脑力劳动。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0401-9. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.注意范围的变化调节了由奖励引起的事件相关电位。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):586-599. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00705-3.
8
Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing.与实践相关的双任务表现优化:重叠任务处理期间的高效任务实例化。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1884-1904. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000576. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.多任务处理中的屏蔽与放松:奖励预期抵消了多任务处理中任务屏蔽的放松。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
The central locus of self-prioritisation.自我优先化的核心位点。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1068-1083. doi: 10.1177/1747021818778970. Epub 2018 Jun 5.