• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身为女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、跨性别者、酷儿或双性人（LGBTQI）与基督徒：心理学研究中理论与概念的范围综述

Being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, or Intersex (LGBTQI) and Christian: A Scoping Review of Theories and Constructs in Psychological Research.

作者信息

Rêgo-Moreira Catarina, Rocha-Silva Tiago, Rodrigues Liliana, Nogueira Conceição

机构信息

Center for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Sex Health. 2024 Apr 11;36(4):439-463. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2331806. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/19317611.2024.2331806
PMID:39552628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562956/
Abstract

In this study, we aimed to map theories and constructs used in psychological research to address LGBTQI and Christian belonging. Through the scoping review method aligned with PRISMA-Extension for Scoping Reviews, we revised 150 studies from the psychological field between 2012 and 2022. We found conflict/negative theories, a turning point from negative to increasingly positive frameworks, exclusively positive perspectives, and broader and challenging theories. There is a gradual shift from conflict/negative perspectives to include positive and broader theories. These findings are critical to base and expand new approaches regarding LGBTQI issues and Christianity in future research.

摘要

在本研究中，我们旨在梳理心理学研究中用于探讨 LGBTQI 群体与基督教归属的理论和概念。通过与 PRISMA 扩展版范围综述相契合的范围综述方法，我们对 2012 年至 2022 年间来自心理学领域的 150 项研究进行了修订。我们发现了冲突/消极理论、从消极框架向日益积极框架的转折点、完全积极的观点以及更广泛且具挑战性的理论。存在从冲突/消极观点逐渐转向纳入积极和更广泛理论的趋势。这些发现对于在未来研究中奠定和扩展关于 LGBTQI 问题与基督教的新方法至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/11562956/ec5c0cd78388/WIJS_A_2331806_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/11562956/d6d3a20dcfb1/WIJS_A_2331806_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/11562956/ec5c0cd78388/WIJS_A_2331806_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/11562956/d6d3a20dcfb1/WIJS_A_2331806_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/11562956/ec5c0cd78388/WIJS_A_2331806_F0002_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, or Intersex (LGBTQI) and Christian: A Scoping Review of Theories and Constructs in Psychological Research.身为女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、跨性别者、酷儿或双性人（LGBTQI）与基督徒：心理学研究中理论与概念的范围综述
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Apr 11;36(4):439-463. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2331806. eCollection 2024.
2
A scoping review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) people's health in India.对印度女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿及双性人（LGBTQI+）群体健康状况的范围界定性综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;3(4):e0001362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001362. eCollection 2023.
3
Older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex peoples' experiences and perceptions of receiving home care services in the community: A systematic review.老年男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者、酷儿和双性人在社区中接受家庭护理服务的体验和看法：系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jun;118:103907. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103907. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Correction: A scoping review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) people's health in India.更正：对印度女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿及双性人（LGBTQI+）群体健康状况的范围界定性综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 13;4(8):e0003644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003644. eCollection 2024.
5
Attitudes, knowledge and practice behaviours of oncology health care professionals towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) patients and their carers: A mixed-methods study.肿瘤学医护人员对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和双性人（LGBTQI）患者及其照顾者的态度、知识和实践行为：一项混合方法研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2512-2523. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
6
LGBTQI cancer patients' quality of life and distress: A comparison by gender, sexuality, age, cancer type and geographical remoteness.LGBTQI癌症患者的生活质量与痛苦：基于性别、性取向、年龄、癌症类型及地理偏远程度的比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;12:873642. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873642. eCollection 2022.
7
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) healthcare in Singapore: perspectives of non-governmental organisations and clinical year medical students.新加坡的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和双性人（LGBTQI+）医疗保健：非政府组织和临床实习医学生的观点。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2172744. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2172744.
8
Inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Health in Australian and New Zealand Medical Education.将女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和双性人健康纳入澳大利亚和新西兰医学教育。
LGBT Health. 2017 Aug;4(4):295-303. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2016.0209. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
9
Medical Students' Perspectives on LGBTQI+ Healthcare and Education in Germany: Results of a Nationwide Online Survey.德国医学生对 LGBTQI+ 医疗保健和教育的看法：一项全国性在线调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 13;19(16):10010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610010.
10
Mixed Study Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Sexuality and Sexual Rehabilitation in LGBTQI+ Adults Living With Chronic Disease.对患有慢性病的LGBTQI+成年人的性取向与性康复的混合研究系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jan;104(1):108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.018. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Internalized Stigma Change the Way that Religiousness Relates to Depression for People with Marginalized Sexualities?内在污名是否改变了宗教信仰与边缘化性取向人群抑郁之间的关系？
J Homosex. 2023 Dec 6;70(14):3328-3352. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2092807. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
First do no harm: Principles of care for clients with sexual identity confusion and/or conflict.首先不造成伤害：关爱有性身份混淆和/或冲突的来访者的原则。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2022 Dec;59(4):487-497. doi: 10.1037/pst0000426. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
Discrimination and depressive symptoms in sexual minority Latinx youth: Moderation by religious importance and attendance.
性少数拉丁裔青年中的歧视和抑郁症状：宗教重要性和参与度的调节作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Aug;36(5):661-670. doi: 10.1037/fam0000936. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.范围综述：加强和推进方法和应用。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3.
5
Is Conservative Religiousness Inherently Associated with Poorer Health for Sexual Minorities?保守宗教信仰是否会使性少数群体的健康状况恶化？
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3055-3075. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01289-4. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
The Experience of Gender Incongruity in the Christian Church: A Qualitative Study.在基督教会中体验性别不一致：一项定性研究。
J Relig Health. 2021 Dec;60(6):4029-4044. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01281-y. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
Sexual Minorities who Reject an LGB Identity: Who Are They and Why Does It Matter?拒绝 LGB 认同的性少数群体：他们是谁，为什么这很重要？
Issues Law Med. 2021 Spring;36(1):27-43.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明：系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
The Coming-Out Process in Family, Social, and Religious Contexts Among Young, Middle, and Older Italian LGBQ+ Adults.意大利年轻、中年和老年LGBQ+成年人在家庭、社会和宗教背景下的出柜过程。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 7;11:617217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617217. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparing the Partnering, Minority Stress, and Depression for Bisexual, Lesbian, and Gay Adults from Religious Upbringings.比较来自宗教成长背景的双性恋、女同性恋和男同性恋成年人的伴侣关系、少数群体压力和抑郁情况。
J Homosex. 2021 Dec 6;68(14):2323-2343. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1804255. Epub 2020 Aug 4.