• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二尖瓣修复手术患者心力衰竭死亡率和再住院率的个性化风险预测

Personalized risk prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery.

作者信息

Zhou Ning, Zhang Kui, Qiao Bokang, Chen Cong, Guo Xiaobo, Fu Wei, Zheng Jubing, Du Jie, Dong Ran

机构信息

Coronary Artery Disease Surgical Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Chaoyang District, China.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hopital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 1;11:1470987. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987
PMID:39553845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11563966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately assessing the postoperative mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risks in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery is of significant importance for individualized medical strategies.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop and validate a risk assessment system for the prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure.

METHODS

Personalized risk prediction system of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure was developed. For developing a prediction system with death as the outcome, there were 965 patients (70%) and 413 patients (30%) were included in the the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. For developing a prediction system with rehospitalization for heart failure as the outcome, there were 927 patients (70%) and 398 patients (30%) were included in the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. There were 42 routine clinical variables used to develop the models. The performance evaluation of the model is based on the area under the curve (AUC). Evaluate the improvement with Euro Score II according to NRI and IDI net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 685 days, the incidence of death was 3.85% ( = 53), and the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure was 10.01% ( = 138). The AUC values of the mortality prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.825 (0.764-0.886) and 0.808 (0.699-0.917), respectively. The AUC values of the rehospitalization for heart failure prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.794 (0.756-0.832) and 0.812 (0.758-0.866), respectively. NRI and IDI showed that the mortality prediction model exhibited superior performance than the Euro Score II. The mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risk prediction models effectively stratified patients into different risk subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The developed and validated models exhibit satisfactory performance in prediction of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure after mitral valve repair surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: (NCT05141292).

摘要

背景

准确评估二尖瓣修复手术患者术后的死亡率和心力衰竭再住院风险对于个体化医疗策略至关重要。

目的

我们试图开发并验证一种用于预测死亡率和心力衰竭再住院的风险评估系统。

方法

开发了心力衰竭死亡率和再住院的个性化风险预测系统。为开发以死亡为结局的预测系统,推导队列纳入965例患者(70%),验证队列纳入413例患者(30%)。为开发以心力衰竭再住院为结局的预测系统,推导队列纳入927例患者(70%),验证队列纳入398例患者(30%)。使用42个常规临床变量来构建模型。模型的性能评估基于曲线下面积(AUC)。根据净重新分类改善(NRI)和综合判别改善(IDI)评估与欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(Euro Score II)相比的改善情况。

结果

中位随访时间为685天,死亡率为3.85%(n = 53),心力衰竭再住院率为10.01%(n = 138)。死亡率预测模型在推导队列和验证队列中的AUC值分别为0.825(0.764 - 0.886)和0.808(0.699 - 0.917)。心力衰竭再住院预测模型在推导队列和验证队列中的AUC值分别为0.794(0.756 - 0.832)和0.812(0.758 - 0.866)。NRI和IDI表明死亡率预测模型表现优于欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II。死亡率和心力衰竭再住院风险预测模型有效地将患者分层到不同风险亚组。

结论

所开发并验证的模型在预测二尖瓣修复手术后的全因死亡率和心力衰竭再住院方面表现出令人满意的性能。

临床试验注册

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,唯一标识符:(NCT05141292)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/1806b4c63258/fcvm-11-1470987-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/45a40406682a/fcvm-11-1470987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/4ef5c06a235c/fcvm-11-1470987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/c6611594292d/fcvm-11-1470987-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/36513fbd54ce/fcvm-11-1470987-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/115a9ec6169a/fcvm-11-1470987-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/7594369a53fe/fcvm-11-1470987-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/1806b4c63258/fcvm-11-1470987-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/45a40406682a/fcvm-11-1470987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/4ef5c06a235c/fcvm-11-1470987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/c6611594292d/fcvm-11-1470987-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/36513fbd54ce/fcvm-11-1470987-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/115a9ec6169a/fcvm-11-1470987-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/7594369a53fe/fcvm-11-1470987-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c729/11563966/1806b4c63258/fcvm-11-1470987-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Personalized risk prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery.二尖瓣修复手术患者心力衰竭死亡率和再住院率的个性化风险预测
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 1;11:1470987. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987. eCollection 2024.
2
Machine Learning-Based Personalized Risk Prediction Model for Mortality of Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: The PRIME Score.基于机器学习的二尖瓣手术患者死亡率个性化风险预测模型:PRIME评分
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;9:866257. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.866257. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and validation of mortality prediction models for heart transplantation using nutrition-related indicators: a single-center study from China.利用营养相关指标开发和验证心脏移植死亡率预测模型:一项来自中国的单中心研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 26;11:1346202. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1346202. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine Learning Identifies Clinical Parameters to Predict Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.机器学习确定预测行经导管二尖瓣修复术患者死亡率的临床参数。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 27;14(18):2027-2036. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.039.
5
A Score to Assess Mortality After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.经皮二尖瓣修复术后死亡率评估评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):562-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.041.
6
Clinical utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for risk stratification of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Derivation and validation of the ADHF/NT-proBNP risk score.N末端B型利钠肽原在急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者风险分层中的临床应用。急性失代偿性心力衰竭/NT-proBNP风险评分的推导与验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Predictive nomogram for 28-day mortality risk in mitral valve disorder patients in the intensive care unit: A comprehensive assessment from the MIMIC-III database.重症监护病房二尖瓣疾病患者 28 天死亡率预测列线图:来自 MIMIC-III 数据库的综合评估。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 15;407:132105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132105. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
Artificial intelligence-derived risk score for mortality in secondary mitral regurgitation treated by transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the EuroSMR risk score.经导管缘对缘修复治疗继发性二尖瓣反流死亡率的人工智能衍生风险评分:欧洲继发性二尖瓣反流风险评分(EuroSMR风险评分)
Eur Heart J. 2024 Mar 14;45(11):922-936. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad871.
9
Rehospitalization Events After Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trial.主动脉瓣置换术后再住院事件:PARTNER 试验的观察结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Dec;15(12):e012195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012195. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
A novel polygenic risk score improves prognostic prediction of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the Chinese Han population.一种新的多基因风险评分可改善中国汉族人心力衰竭保留射血分数患者的预后预测。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Sep 20;30(13):1382-1390. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad209.

本文引用的文献

1
Valvular heart disease: from mechanisms to management.瓣膜性心脏病:从机制到治疗。
Lancet. 2024 Apr 20;403(10436):1576-1589. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02755-1. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Implications of Atrial Fibrillation for Guideline-Directed Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.心房颤动对心力衰竭患者指南导向治疗的影响:JACC 最新观点综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Mar 5;83(9):932-950. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.033.
3
Minithoracotomy vs Conventional Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
微创小切口与传统胸骨正中切口行二尖瓣修复术的随机对照临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jun 13;329(22):1957-1966. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7800.
4
Predictors of sacubitril/valsartan high dose tolerability in a real world population with HFrEF.射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)真实世界人群中沙库巴曲缬沙坦高剂量耐受的预测因素。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):2909-2917. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13982. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Left atrial disease and left atrial reverse remodelling across different stages of heart failure development and progression: a new target for prevention and treatment.左心房疾病和左心房逆重构在心力衰竭发展和进展的不同阶段:预防和治疗的新靶点。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):959-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2562. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation-Chicken or Egg?心力衰竭与心房颤动——孰因孰果?
Circ Res. 2022 Apr;130(7):1011-1013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320930. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
High-Sensitivity Troponin I after Cardiac Surgery and 30-Day Mortality.心脏手术后高敏肌钙蛋白 I 与 30 天死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 3;386(9):827-836. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000803.
8
Frailty in cardiology: definition, assessment and clinical implications for general cardiology. A consensus document of the Council for Cardiology Practice (CCP), Association for Acute Cardio Vascular Care (ACVC), Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Council on Valvular Heart Diseases (VHD), Council on Hypertension (CHT), Council of Cardio-Oncology (CCO), Working Group (WG) Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, WG e-Cardiology, WG Thrombosis, of the European Society of Cardiology, European Primary Care Cardiology Society (EPCCS).心血管领域的脆弱性:定义、评估及对普通心血管病学的临床意义。该共识文件由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)下属的心血管病实践委员会(CCP)、急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、心血管护理和相关专业协会(ACNAP)、欧洲预防心脏病学会(EAPC)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)、瓣膜心脏病学会(VHD)、高血压学会(CHT)、心血管肿瘤学会(CCO)、工作组(WG)主动脉和外周血管疾病、WG 电子心脏病学、WG 血栓形成,以及欧洲初级保健心脏病学会(EPCCS)共同制定。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Feb 19;29(1):216-227. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa167.
9
A machine learning risk score predicts mortality across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.机器学习风险评分可预测左心室射血分数谱中的死亡率。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;23(6):995-999. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2155. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):450-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.035. Epub 2020 Dec 17.