Suppr超能文献

一项基于社区的狂犬病疫苗接种策略有效性的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a community-based rabies vaccination strategy.

作者信息

Lankester Felix, Lugelo Ahmed, Changalucha Joel, Anderson Danni, Duamor Christian Tetteh, Czupryna Anna, Lushasi Kennedy, Ferguson Elaine, Swai Emmanuel S, Nonga Hezron, Sambo Maganga, Cleaveland Sarah, Wyke Sally, Johnson Paul C D, Hampson Katie

机构信息

Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

Global Animal Health Tanzania, Arusha, Tanzania.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 31:2024.10.28.620430. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.28.620430.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 60,000 people die from dog-mediated rabies annually. Low and heterogeneous coverage reduces the effectiveness of dog vaccination campaigns that can eliminate rabies. Campaigns typically involve teams travelling annually to villages to deliver cold chain stored vaccines from centralized headquarters. Thermotolerant vaccines enable novel decentralized delivery of locally-stored vaccines by communities throughout the year. We compared the effectiveness of annual team-based versus continuous community-based dog vaccination strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial across Mara region, Tanzania. Trial clusters were administrative wards (112, on average four villages each). For the team-based arm vaccinators hosted annual static-point clinics, whilst for the community-based arm, a ward-based animal health officer with a village community leader managed vaccinations using vaccines stored within the ward. We measured vaccination coverage, the primary outcome, twice annually per cluster (month 1 and 11) through household surveys over three years (November 2020 to October 2023) and examined spatial and temporal coverage variations as secondary outcomes.

FINDINGS

Community-based delivery achieved significantly higher coverage (49-62%) than team-based delivery (22-46%), and consistently exceeded the critical threshold for herd immunity (40%), Odds ratio (OR): 1.48-3.49. The lower less uniform coverage achieved through team-based delivery had a higher monthly probability of falling below the critical threshold (0.6, 95% CI: 0.38-0.81) vs 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04-0.40). Greater declines in coverage over the year were recorded in the team-based arm compared to the community-based.

CONCLUSION

Community-based mass dog vaccination achieves higher more consistent coverage than team-based delivery across settings typical of many sub-Saharan African countries. This approach could play an important role in national rabies elimination programmes aiming to end human rabies deaths by 2030 as part of the global 'zero by 30' strategy.

摘要

背景

每年约有6万人死于犬传狂犬病。低覆盖率和覆盖率不均降低了可消除狂犬病的犬类疫苗接种活动的效果。这些活动通常包括团队每年前往村庄,从中央总部运送冷链储存的疫苗。耐热疫苗使社区能够全年对本地储存的疫苗进行新型分散式接种。我们比较了基于团队的年度接种策略与基于社区的持续接种策略的效果。

方法

我们在坦桑尼亚的马拉地区进行了一项整群随机对照试验。试验群组为行政区(共112个,平均每个行政区有4个村庄)。在基于团队的组中,接种人员每年举办定点诊所,而在基于社区的组中,一名行政区动物卫生官员与一名村庄社区领袖使用储存在行政区内的疫苗管理疫苗接种工作。我们通过在三年(2020年11月至2023年10月)内对每个群组每年进行两次(第1个月和第11个月)的家庭调查来测量疫苗接种覆盖率这一主要结果,并将空间和时间覆盖率变化作为次要结果进行研究。

结果

基于社区的接种方式的覆盖率(49%-62%)显著高于基于团队的接种方式(22%-46%),并且始终超过群体免疫的临界阈值(40%),优势比(OR):1.48-3.49。通过基于团队的接种方式实现的较低且不太均匀的覆盖率每月低于临界阈值的概率更高(0.6,95%置信区间:0.38-0.81),而基于社区的接种方式为0.18(95%置信区间:0.04-0.40)。与基于社区的组相比,基于团队的组在一年中的覆盖率下降幅度更大。

结论

在许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家典型的环境中,基于社区的大规模犬类疫苗接种比基于团队的接种方式能实现更高且更一致的覆盖率。作为全球“30·30零死亡”战略的一部分,这种方法在旨在到2030年消除人类狂犬病死亡的国家狂犬病消除计划中可发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7b/11565783/4508368e7eda/nihpp-2024.10.28.620430v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验