• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病的临床效果比较研究

Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.

作者信息

Wang YiXiao, Song Yang, Ma Yue, Sun Xinyu, Wang Hua

机构信息

YiXiao Wang, Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, Jilin 132011, Jilin, China.

Yang Song, Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, Jilin 132011, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2238-2242. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.9344.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.10.9344
PMID:39554660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568700/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study. The clinical data of 80 patients with lumbar disc degenerative disease who underwent surgery in Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University from May 2018 to May 2023 were selected. The patients were divided into LLIF group and OLIF group according to surgical methods. Compare the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-36), Visual Analog Scale(VAS) scores, Oswesterly Disability Index(ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA) scores, Cobb angle, and intervertebral height changes between two groups of patients pre- and posttreatment, and evaluate the differences in clinical efficacy and surgical complications.

RESULT

Postsurgery, the SF-36 score, VAS score, ODI index, and JOA score of two groups were significantly better than presurgery(p<0.05); After three months of treatment, the improvement in OLIF group was better than LLIF group(p<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at six months postsurgery(p>0.05). Six months postsurgery, the intervertebral space height and Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved compared to presurgery (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups(p>0.05). There was no difference in clinical efficacy and incidence between the two groups(p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

LLIF and OLIF may be both safe and effective minimally invasive surgical methods for the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.

摘要

目的

比较斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病的临床效果。

方法

本研究为回顾性研究。选取2018年5月至2023年5月在北华大学附属医院接受手术治疗的80例腰椎间盘退变疾病患者的临床资料。根据手术方式将患者分为LLIF组和OLIF组。比较两组患者治疗前后的36项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswesterly功能障碍指数(ODI)、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分、Cobb角及椎间隙高度变化,并评估临床疗效及手术并发症的差异。

结果

术后,两组患者的SF-36评分、VAS评分、ODI指数及JOA评分均显著优于术前(p<0.05);治疗3个月后,OLIF组的改善情况优于LLIF组(p<0.05),而术后6个月两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术后6个月,两组患者的椎间隙高度和Cobb角均较术前显著改善(p<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组间临床疗效及发生率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

LLIF和OLIF可能都是治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病安全有效的微创手术方法。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病的临床效果比较研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2238-2242. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.9344.
2
Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.斜外侧椎间融合术与侧路腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的影像学和临床结果差异:荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 4;20(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2972-7.
3
[Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].[斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床与影像学比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):414-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.004.
4
Early effect of standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with lateral screw fixation of the vertebral body on single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: A pilot study.单纯斜外侧椎间融合与联合椎体侧方螺钉固定治疗单节段腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病的早期疗效:一项初步研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):709-719. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220156.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与斜外侧腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7.
6
[Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及肌肉损伤影像学比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):420-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005.
7
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study.单纯外侧与斜外侧椎间融合治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项多中心队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(Suppl 2):222-228. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5596-y. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
[Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery].[斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎手术后椎间融合器移位效果的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 15;34(6):761-768. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201911020.
10
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;9:829426. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.829426. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders.L5/S1节段斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗退变性腰骶部疾病的比较临床分析
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jul 11;7(1):66-73. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0028. eCollection 2023 Jan 27.
2
Oblique lateral interbody fusion stand-alone vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of discogenic low back pain.斜外侧椎间融合术单独应用与联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛的疗效比较
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 6;9:1013431. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1013431. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of PLIF and TLIF in the Treatment of LDH Complicated with Spinal Stenosis.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗伴发腰椎管狭窄的退变性腰椎间盘疾病的比较。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 26;2022:9743283. doi: 10.1155/2022/9743283. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases.改良侧方腰椎间融合术与传统 XLIF 和 OLIF 治疗 L4-5 腰椎退变性疾病的疗效和安全性比较:一项 156 例回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 7;23(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05138-7.
5
Comparison of surgical outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)与前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)的手术效果比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106901. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106901. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test.不同腰椎后路椎弓根螺钉置入技术的应力分布:有限元分析与生物力学试验的联合研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 21;11(1):12968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6.
7
Low back pain.下背痛。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Full-Endoscopic Foraminotomy with a Novel Large Endoscopic Trephine for Severe Degenerative Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis at L S Level: An Advanced Surgical Technique.使用新型大型内镜环锯行全内镜下椎间孔切开术治疗L₅S₁节段重度退行性腰椎椎间孔狭窄:一种先进的手术技术
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):659-668. doi: 10.1111/os.12924. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人脊柱畸形斜外侧椎间融合术的疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2022 Jan;12(1):142-154. doi: 10.1177/2192568220979145. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
A comparative study of Lumbar Decompression and Fusion with Internal Fixation versus Simple Decompression in elderly patients with two-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.老年双节段腰椎管狭窄症患者行腰椎减压融合内固定术与单纯减压术的对比研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jan-Feb;37(1):256-260. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.2287.