School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
The Speech Doctor, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13132. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13132. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
Speech sound disorders (SSDs) are broadly defined as difficulty producing speech sounds in childhood. Reported prevalence of SSD varies from 2.3% to 24.6%, depending on how SSD is defined and the included age range. SSDs that do not resolve before age 8 can have a lasting impact on a child's academic achievements. The intensity of intervention for SSD is important to ensure effectiveness. However, there is a gap between the evidence base for intensity and speech and language therapists' (SLTs) clinical practice. One way that SLTs try to bridge this gap is by working with parents. SLTs believe that working with parents/caregivers is vital for a child with SSD to make progress.
To conduct a scoping review of the literature to provide a comprehensive picture of the perceptions, experiences and strategies underpinning collaborative working between SLTs and parents/caregivers of children (aged ≤ 5 years 11 months) with SSD to increase intervention intensity at home.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: This scoping review was completed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo, CINHAL, Web of Science, EBSCOhost and EThOS was conducted using synonyms of three key terms: SSD, Therapy, Parents. Key journals and papers were hand searched for unique papers. A total of 29 papers were included for review. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis to develop themes. These themes are discussed using the PAGER framework to identify advances, gaps, evidence for practice and areas for future research.
Seven key themes were identified: individualization, setting expectations, daily life, parental knowledge, parental involvement, therapeutic relationships and supporting parents to deliver home practice. There has been an acceleration of research around working with parents of children with SSD, with increased consideration of effective adult coaching techniques. Parents value the parental and child relationship with the SLT and feel this supports the success of home practice. There is a need for further research, and guidance for SLTs working with parents of children with SSD to enable them to support parents to deliver home practice effectively.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Emerging evidence supports the value of SLTs and parents working together to support home practice for children with SSD. The review highlighted the importance of SLTs allocating time to build positive therapeutic relationships with parents to support engagement in therapy. Approaching intervention, in particular, home practice, flexibly and in collaboration with parents, allows parents to fit home practice into their daily lives. Providing clear information to parents supports the fidelity of, and engagement in, home practice.
What is already known on the subject There is a gap between what is recommended in the evidence base for intervention intensity for children with SSD and current clinical practice worldwide. SLTs try to bridge this gap through home practice and believe that working with parents/caregivers is vital for children with SSD to make progress. However, little is known about the best ways for SLTs to work with parents for this population. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge Training parents to be implementers of intervention in a personalized and flexible way is important and valued by parents and SLTs. Parents value understanding the clinical rationale behind the intervention approach and benefit from explicit instructions for home practice, including discussion, written information, observation and feedback. Therapeutic relationships take time to develop and impact parental engagement in home practice. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings of this study highlight existing knowledge which will support SLTs to work optimally with parents to implement home practice for their child with SSD. It highlights the importance of taking time to foster working relationships with parents to support effective home practice. The review identifies gaps in the current skills and knowledge of SLTs, highlighting the need for further research, support and guidance for SLTs in their work with parents, as well as implications for the development of the SLT pre-registration curriculum.
言语障碍(SSD)被广泛定义为儿童时期言语发音困难。SSD 的患病率因如何定义 SSD 和包括的年龄范围而异,从 2.3%到 24.6%不等。如果 8 岁前 SSD 没有得到解决,可能会对孩子的学业成绩产生持久的影响。SSD 干预的强度很重要,以确保有效性。然而,证据基础与言语语言治疗师(SLT)的临床实践之间存在差距。SLT 试图通过与家长合作来缩小这一差距。SLT 认为,与 SSD 儿童的家长/照顾者合作对于孩子取得进展至关重要。
对文献进行范围综述,全面了解 SLT 与 SSD 儿童(≤5 岁 11 个月)的家长/照顾者合作的观念、经验和策略,以增加家庭干预强度。
本范围综述按照 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行。使用三个关键术语的同义词对 PubMed、PsycInfo、CINHAL、Web of Science、EBSCOhost 和 EThOS 进行了系统搜索。对重点期刊和论文进行了手工搜索,以获取独特的论文。共纳入 29 篇论文进行综述。使用主题合成分析数据,以制定主题。使用 PAGER 框架讨论这些主题,以确定进展、差距、实践证据和未来研究领域。
确定了七个关键主题:个体化、设定期望、日常生活、家长知识、家长参与、治疗关系和支持家长进行家庭实践。与 SSD 儿童的家长合作的研究加速,更多地考虑了有效的成人指导技巧。家长重视与 SLT 的亲子关系,并认为这有助于家庭实践的成功。需要进一步研究,并为与 SSD 儿童的家长合作的 SLT 提供指导,以使他们能够有效地支持家长进行家庭实践。
新兴证据支持 SLT 和家长共同支持 SSD 儿童家庭实践的价值。综述强调了 SLT 分配时间与家长建立积极治疗关系的重要性,以支持他们参与治疗。特别是,灵活地并与家长合作进行干预,使家长能够将家庭实践融入日常生活。向家长提供清晰的信息支持家庭实践的忠实度和参与度。
主题:主题 1:个性化。主题 2:设定期望。主题 3:日常生活。主题 4:家长知识。主题 5:家长参与。主题 6:治疗关系。主题 7:支持家长进行家庭实践。
关键发现:为家长提供个性化和灵活的干预实施培训很重要,并且受到家长和 SLT 的重视。家长重视理解干预方法的临床原理,并从家庭实践的明确指导中受益,包括讨论、书面信息、观察和反馈。治疗关系需要时间发展,并影响家长对家庭实践的参与。
未来方向:本研究的结果突出了现有知识,将支持 SLT 与家长合作,为 SSD 儿童实施家庭实践。它强调了花时间培养与家长的工作关系以支持有效家庭实践的重要性。综述确定了 SLT 目前在技能和知识方面的差距,突出了进一步研究、支持和指导 SLT 与家长合作的必要性,以及对 SLT 注册前课程发展的影响。