• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的完整性。

The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.

Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2024 Nov 18;95:654-660. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42303.

DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.42303
PMID:39556459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.

METHODS

We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.

RESULTS

14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.

CONCLUSION

National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.

摘要

背景与目的

国家关节置换登记处是为前瞻性监测结果和植入物上市后监测而设立的。越来越多的登记处数据为实践提供信息。然而,对登记处的分析只能与它对目标人群所捕获的数据一样好。我们旨在分析全球所有国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处报告的程序的完整性。

方法

我们分析了年度报告和根据书面请求向所有活跃的国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处提供的数据。覆盖率定义为参与登记处的医院比例。程序完整性定义为登记处成功捕获的程序比例。

结果

共纳入 14 个国家登记处,涵盖 2004 年至 2022 年。10 个国家的登记处覆盖率完整。所有年份的原发性髋关节和膝关节置换的程序完整性中位数为 96.5%(四分位距[IQR]94.0-97.7%)。翻修手术的程序完整性中位数为 88.5%(IQR 81.0-92.5%)。登记处中使用的术语和计算完整性估计的方法各不相同。

结论

在过去的 20 年里,国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的数据通常反映出出色的覆盖率(14 个登记处中有 10 个完整)和完整性(原发性手术 96.5%,翻修手术 88.5%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/24b33f90baf5/ActaO-95-42303-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/95e982a36e98/ActaO-95-42303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/0fd829859eb5/ActaO-95-42303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/ba020a10c30e/ActaO-95-42303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/7bd7bc1ed92b/ActaO-95-42303-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/8d0f738447bc/ActaO-95-42303-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/24b33f90baf5/ActaO-95-42303-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/95e982a36e98/ActaO-95-42303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/0fd829859eb5/ActaO-95-42303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/ba020a10c30e/ActaO-95-42303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/7bd7bc1ed92b/ActaO-95-42303-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/8d0f738447bc/ActaO-95-42303-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0856/11574073/24b33f90baf5/ActaO-95-42303-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的完整性。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Nov 18;95:654-660. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42303.
2
More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register.在基于人群的荷兰关节置换登记处中,报告程序的完整性超过95%。
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):498-505. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
3
Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.挪威关节成形术登记处的登记完整性。
Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):49-56. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045696.
4
Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry: A Comparison With Other National Registries.美国关节置换登记处的早期结果:与其他国家登记处的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S125-S134.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
5
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.关节置换外科医生的修正率与术后患者报告的结果测量评分相关吗?来自澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):98-112. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002737. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Global Perspectives on Arthroplasty of Hip and Knee Joints.髋关节和膝关节置换术的全球视角
Orthop Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;51(2):169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.003. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Joint replacement surgery in Ghana (West Africa)-an observational study.加纳(西非)的关节置换手术——一项观察性研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04286-1. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?国际髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的患者报告结局评分如何比较?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact.过去五十年来的关节置换植入物登记系统:发展、现状及未来影响
J Orthop Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):2319-2330. doi: 10.1002/jor.24014. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Costs of Joint Replacement in Osteoarthritis: A Study Using the National Joint Registry and Clinical Practice Research Datalink Data Sets.骨关节炎关节置换的成本:一项使用全国关节登记处和临床实践研究数据链接数据集的研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Mar;74(3):392-402. doi: 10.1002/acr.24470. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Patellofemoral arthroplasty-patient demographics and revision causes compared with total and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term follow-up data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.髌股关节置换术——与全膝关节置换术和内侧单髁膝关节置换术相比的患者人口统计学特征及翻修原因:来自挪威关节置换登记处的长期随访数据
Acta Orthop. 2025 Sep 2;96:671-676. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44593.
2
High-volume hospitals do not perform better than low-volume hospitals in septic and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of re-revision risk and mortality based on the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.在感染性和无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中,高手术量医院并不比低手术量医院表现更好:基于荷兰关节置换登记处的再翻修风险和死亡率分析。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Aug 15;96:625-631. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44331.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future.髋关节置换登记对骨科实践的影响及未来展望。
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):368-376. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180091. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in total and unicondylar knee replacements using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study.评估英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处数据中全膝关节和单髁膝关节置换术中使用的假体构建的非劣效性:基准研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 29;9(4):e026736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026736.
3
Short-term survivorship of Truliant total knee arthroplasty implants utilizing the American Joint Replacement Registry.利用美国关节置换登记处数据的Truliant全膝关节置换植入物的短期生存率
World J Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;16(7):106281. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281.
4
Variation in hip replacement rates and surgical workforce across Nordic European countries.北欧国家髋关节置换率和外科手术人员的差异。
Int Orthop. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06587-0.
Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study.
评估英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处数据中髋关节置换术中使用的假体结构的非劣效性:基准研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 29;9(4):e026685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685.
4
Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact.过去五十年来的关节置换植入物登记系统:发展、现状及未来影响
J Orthop Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):2319-2330. doi: 10.1002/jor.24014. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register.在基于人群的荷兰关节置换登记处中,报告程序的完整性超过95%。
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):498-505. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size.基于覆盖度的稀有度估计和外推:通过完整性而不是大小来标准化样本。
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2533-47. doi: 10.1890/11-1952.1.
7
The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998.瑞典癌症登记处的完整性:1998年的抽样调查
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27-33. doi: 10.1080/02841860802247664.
8
Civil registration systems and vital statistics: successes and missed opportunities.民事登记系统和人口动态统计:成就与错失的机遇。
Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1653-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61308-7.
9
Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.挪威关节成形术登记处的登记完整性。
Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):49-56. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045696.
10
The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data.捕获-再捕获模型在流行病学数据中的应用。
Stat Med. 2001 Oct 30;20(20):3123-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.996.