• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索患者参与医学生妇产科教育的研究:系统评价方案。

Exploring patient involvement in obstetrics and gynaecology education for medical students: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e089287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089287.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089287
PMID:39557554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11575323/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is important to incorporate the patient perspective into healthcare education, as we know that patients are experts in their own conditions. The expertise gained through lived experience serves to complement the theoretical knowledge that healthcare educators can provide. This scoping review aims to explore patient involvement in medical education within obstetrics and gynaecology, a specialty that can provide unique challenges and complexities to patient involvement due to its potentially highly sensitive and intimate nature. The goal of this study is to map the available literature on this topic which will allow for the identification of potential gaps in the provision of training for medical students in this field. The research also aims to highlight challenges that may be associated with patient involvement in this specialty in order to guide future initiatives.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review framework and methodology will be used to guide and conduct this scoping review. A systematic search of electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, Google Scholar, Web of Science, African Journals Online, Cochrane Library and SciVerse will be carried out. Articles will be limited to the English language. No geographical limitations will be placed on the search. Literature from 1960 to 2023 will be considered for inclusion which corresponds with the first reports of patient educators used to assist with the demonstration of clinical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. Relevant academic journals will be hand-searched for the previous 5 years. Identified studies will be screened by two independent reviewers and data extraction carried out by the primary researcher. Key findings will be presented in tables and summarised in narrative form. Findings from the review will be reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting checklist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings from the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and at medical education conferences.

摘要

简介

将患者视角纳入医疗保健教育非常重要,因为我们知道患者是自身病情的专家。通过生活经验获得的专业知识可以补充医疗教育者所能提供的理论知识。本范围综述旨在探讨妇产科医学教育中的患者参与,该专业由于其潜在的高度敏感和亲密性质,可能给患者参与带来独特的挑战和复杂性。本研究的目的是绘制关于该主题的现有文献图谱,以便确定在该领域为医学生提供培训方面可能存在的差距。该研究还旨在突出与该专业患者参与相关的挑战,以指导未来的举措。

方法和分析

乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)范围综述框架和方法将用于指导和进行本范围综述。将对 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO、ERIC、Google Scholar、Web of Science、African Journals Online、Cochrane Library 和 SciVerse 等电子数据库进行系统检索。文章将仅限于英语。搜索将不限制地理位置。将考虑纳入 1960 年至 2023 年的文献,这与首次报告使用患者教育者协助演示妇产科临床技能相对应。将对过去 5 年的相关学术期刊进行手工检索。由两名独立评审员筛选确定的研究,并由主要研究人员进行数据提取。主要发现将以表格形式呈现,并以叙述形式总结。综述结果将按照 PRISMA 扩展范围综述报告清单进行报告。

伦理和传播

本研究不需要伦理批准。该研究的结果将提交给同行评议期刊和医学教育会议发表。

相似文献

1
Exploring patient involvement in obstetrics and gynaecology education for medical students: a scoping review protocol.探索患者参与医学生妇产科教育的研究:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e089287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089287.
2
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Bridging theory and practice: a scoping review protocol on gamification's impact in clinical reasoning education.架起理论与实践的桥梁:一项关于游戏化对临床推理教育影响的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 4;14(12):e086262. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086262.
4
Trauma-informed family carer education and practical skills training in dementia: a systematic scoping review protocol.痴呆症中创伤知情的家庭照顾者教育与实践技能培训:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e090202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090202.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
Linguistically responsive learning and teaching for non-native speakers in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育中非母语者的语言响应式学习与教学:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083181.
7
Interventions to support medical trainee well-being when dealing with patient death: a scoping review protocol.干预措施以支持医疗实习生在处理患者死亡时的幸福感:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 8;13(6):e072530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072530.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Interprofessional education interventions in undergraduate students of musculoskeletal healthcare professions: a scoping review protocol.跨专业教育干预在肌肉骨骼保健专业本科学生中的应用:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e078483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078483.
10
Physicians' emotion awareness and emotion regulation training during medical education: a systematic scoping review protocol.医学教育中医生情绪意识和情绪调节训练:系统范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e080643. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080643.

本文引用的文献

1
Focus on patients in medical education.医学教育以患者为中心。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;38(5):Doc97. doi: 10.3205/zma001493. eCollection 2021.
2
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
3
Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.主动患者参与本科医学教育的作用:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 27;10(7):e037217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037217.
4
Fostering patient-centredness by following patients outside the clinical setting: an interview study.通过在临床环境之外随访患者来培养以患者为中心:一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1928-9.
5
Patient/service user involvement in medical education: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58.患者/服务使用者参与医学教育:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价:BEME 指南第 58 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Jan;42(1):4-16. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652731. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
8
Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals.积极推动患者参与卫生专业人员的教育。
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):64-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x.
9
Strategies and interventions for the involvement of real patients in medical education: a systematic review.让真实患者参与医学教育的策略与干预措施:一项系统综述
Med Educ. 2009 Jan;43(1):10-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03244.x.
10
THE PROGRAMMED PATIENT: A TECHNIQUE FOR APPRAISING STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN CLINICAL NEUROLOGY.程序化患者:一种评估学生临床神经学表现的技术。
J Med Educ. 1964 Aug;39:802-5.