Harit Anshika, Yadav Manisha, Sachdeva Sarthak, Sethi Deepika
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Delhi, India.
B 3/474A Tara Nagar, Duggal Farms, Kakrola, New Delhi, 10078 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5557-5565. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05031-w. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of bleomycin and sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS) as sclerotherapeutic treatment modalities for low-flow vascular and lymphatic malformations. A total of 30 patients in age group of 9-60 years with vascular and lymphatic anomalies in the head and neck region were included in our study and divided into two groups of 15 each. Patients in group 1 received bleomycin injections, while group 2 received STS for treatment. They were followed up in records for two years to look for resolution/ relapse/ recurrence of lesions. The no. of injections depended on the lesion size and response after the first and subsequent doses. Results showed that both drugs effectively treated these lesions, with no significant differences in efficacy and safety profiles. However, injection bleomycin had a slightly better cure rate (72%) than STS (61%). Both drugs required similar number of injections to be administered for a similar level of cure. Sclerotherapy provides a precious, non-invasive alternative to surgery in patients with slow-flow vascular and lymphatic anomalies. However, further research is needed to explore potential limitations and avenues for improvement.
这项回顾性研究旨在评估博来霉素和十四烷基硫酸钠(STS)作为硬化治疗手段对低流量血管和淋巴管畸形的疗效。我们的研究纳入了30例年龄在9至60岁之间、头颈部存在血管和淋巴管异常的患者,并将其分为两组,每组15例。第1组患者接受博来霉素注射,而第2组患者接受STS治疗。对他们进行了两年的记录随访,以观察病变的消退/复发/再发情况。注射次数取决于病变大小以及首次及后续剂量后的反应。结果显示,两种药物均能有效治疗这些病变,在疗效和安全性方面无显著差异。然而,注射博来霉素的治愈率(72%)略高于STS(61%)。两种药物达到相似治愈水平所需的注射次数相近。硬化治疗为患有低流量血管和淋巴管异常的患者提供了一种宝贵的、非侵入性的手术替代方案。然而,需要进一步研究以探索潜在的局限性和改进途径。