Li Yongjian, Luo Minghao, Chang Qing, Cao Shuyuan, Wang Yang, Chen Zhi, Yang Jitang, Liu Guochun
The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(21):e39505. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39505. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
Evidence-based guidelines suggest that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is more beneficial than aerobic exercise for patients with cardiovascular disease, but the differences in underlying pathophysiological mechanisms require further confirmation. The comparison between HIIT and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in regulating vascular dysfunction in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), along with their underlying mechanisms, has not been previously reported. The purpose of this study is to provide an experimental basis for exercise prescription therapy in hypertensive patients. In this study, six-week-old male SHR were randomly assigned to a HIIT group, MICT group, or sedentary group. Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) of the same age were used as the control group. The weight, heart rate, and blood pressure of the rats were monitored weekly throughout twelve weeks of treadmill training. At the end of the protocol, serum and aortic vascular tissues were collected for further vascular function tests and molecular and biochemical analyses. The results show that MICT is more favorable for weight control than HIIT, while both forms of exercise offer equal protection against hypertension. However, MICT demonstrates a greater benefit in preserving vascular morphology, whereas HIIT is more effective in reducing oxidative stress. Both HIIT and MICT ameliorate vascular dysfunction in SHR by suppressing nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat pyrin-domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3)-induced pyroptosis. The superior effect of HIIT on vascular dysfunction may be related to the inhibition of oxidative stress injury through AMPKα-SIRT1 activation. This study provides insight into the dose-effect relationship of exercise for cardiovascular health and offers foundational evidence for the development of exercise prescription therapies.
循证指南表明,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对心血管疾病患者比有氧运动更有益,但潜在病理生理机制的差异需要进一步证实。此前尚未有关于HIIT与中等强度持续训练(MICT)在调节自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)血管功能障碍方面的比较及其潜在机制的报道。本研究的目的是为高血压患者的运动处方治疗提供实验依据。在本研究中,六周龄雄性SHR被随机分为HIIT组、MICT组或久坐组。将同年龄的Wistar Kyoto大鼠(WKY)作为对照组。在为期十二周的跑步机训练过程中,每周监测大鼠的体重、心率和血压。在实验方案结束时,收集血清和主动脉血管组织用于进一步的血管功能测试以及分子和生化分析。结果表明,MICT在体重控制方面比HIIT更有利,而两种运动形式对高血压的预防作用相当。然而,MICT在保持血管形态方面显示出更大的益处,而HIIT在降低氧化应激方面更有效。HIIT和MICT均通过抑制含核苷酸结合结构域和富含亮氨酸重复序列的吡啉结构域蛋白3(NLRP3)诱导的细胞焦亡来改善SHR的血管功能障碍。HIIT对血管功能障碍的优越作用可能与通过激活AMPKα-SIRT1抑制氧化应激损伤有关。本研究为运动对心血管健康的剂量效应关系提供了见解,并为运动处方治疗的发展提供了基础证据。