Borba Ester M, Santos Cássia T, de Fátima Lucena Amália
Nursing, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Department of Clinical-Surgical Nursing, Nursing School. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Oct;36(4):449-456. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12494. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
This study aimed to validate the content of the nursing diagnosis (ND) "Risk for elopement attempt" and increase its level of evidence (LOE) in the NANDA International (NANDA-I) Classification.
A content validity study was conducted based on expert opinions. The sample consisted of 33 experts with academic training in nursing and practical and theoretical experience concerning the nursing process. Data collection was performed using a Google Forms® questionnaire, which was electronically sent to the experts. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, and the diagnostic content validity was based on the Fehring model. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution.
The title and definition of the ND under investigation were validated, along with 15 risk factors. Among these, "Substance misuse" was classified as major (0.96), whereas the others were validated as minor. Of the 13 risk populations, 6 were validated and classified as major, such as "Individuals with history of elopement" (0.90); 6 were validated and classified as minor, including "Individuals with a history of nonadherence to treatment regimen" (0.79); and "Economically disadvantaged individuals" were discarded (0.46). Of the three associated conditions, one was validated as major, namely, "Mental disorders" (0.86), whereas the other two were classified as minor.
This study validated the content of the "Risk for elopement attempt" ND, allowing it to be assigned a higher LOE based on the nursing experts. All components were validated except for one of the associated conditions.
The validated ND will be submitted to NANDA-I, enabling it to achieve a higher LOE in the classification. This update will enhance the quality of this diagnostic classification and, consequently, patient care and nursing education and research.
本研究旨在验证护理诊断(ND)“有企图出走风险”的内容,并提高其在国际护理诊断协会(NANDA - I)分类中的证据等级(LOE)。
基于专家意见进行了一项内容效度研究。样本包括33名具有护理学术培训以及护理程序实践和理论经验的专家。使用谷歌表单®问卷进行数据收集,并通过电子邮件发送给专家。数据分析采用描述性统计,诊断内容效度基于费林模型。本研究获得了该机构研究伦理委员会的批准。
所研究的ND的标题和定义以及15个风险因素得到了验证。其中,“药物滥用”被归类为主要因素(0.96),而其他因素被验证为次要因素。在13个风险人群中,6个得到验证并被归类为主要因素,如“有出走史的个体”(0.90);6个得到验证并被归类为次要因素,包括“有不遵守治疗方案史的个体”(0.79);“经济弱势个体”被排除(0.46)。在三个相关状况中,一个被验证为主要状况,即“精神障碍”(0.86),而其他两个被归类为次要状况。
本研究验证了“有企图出走风险”ND的内容,基于护理专家的意见使其获得了更高的证据等级。除了一个相关状况外,所有组成部分均得到了验证。
经过验证的ND将提交给NANDA - I,使其在分类中能够获得更高的证据等级。这一更新将提高该诊断分类的质量,从而提升患者护理以及护理教育和研究水平。