Zapién-Campos Román, Bansept Florence, Traulsen Arne
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
PLoS Biol. 2024 Nov 21;22(11):e3002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002913. eCollection 2024 Nov.
How can we figure out how the different microbes interact within microbiomes? To combine theoretical models and experimental data, we often fit a deterministic model for the mean dynamics of a system to averaged data. However, in the averaging procedure a lot of information from the data is lost-and a deterministic model may be a poor representation of a stochastic reality. Here, we develop an inference method for microbiomes based on the idea that both the experiment and the model are stochastic. Starting from a stochastic model, we derive dynamical equations not only for the average, but also for higher statistical moments of the microbial abundances. We use these equations to infer distributions of the interaction parameters that best describe the biological experimental data-improving identifiability and precision. The inferred distributions allow us to make predictions but also to distinguish between fairly certain parameters and those for which the available experimental data does not give sufficient information. Compared to related approaches, we derive expressions that also work for the relative abundance of microbes, enabling us to use conventional metagenome data, and account for cases where not a single host, but only replicate hosts, can be tracked over time.
我们如何弄清楚微生物群落中不同微生物之间是如何相互作用的呢?为了将理论模型与实验数据相结合,我们常常将一个系统平均动态的确定性模型拟合到平均数据上。然而,在平均过程中,数据中的许多信息会丢失,而且确定性模型可能无法很好地代表随机现实。在此,我们基于实验和模型都是随机的这一理念,开发了一种用于微生物群落的推断方法。从一个随机模型出发,我们不仅推导出了微生物丰度平均值的动力学方程,还推导出了其高阶统计矩的动力学方程。我们使用这些方程来推断最能描述生物学实验数据的相互作用参数的分布,从而提高可识别性和精度。推断出的分布不仅使我们能够进行预测,还能区分相当确定的参数和那些现有实验数据无法提供足够信息的参数。与相关方法相比,我们推导出的表达式也适用于微生物的相对丰度,使我们能够使用传统的宏基因组数据,并考虑到随着时间推移无法追踪单个宿主,而只能追踪多个复制宿主的情况。