Greenwood-Hickman Mikael Anne, Yarborough Laura, Shulman Lisa, Arterburn David E, Cooper Julie, Delaney Kristin, Estrada Camilo, Green Beverly B, Holden Erika, McClure Jennifer B, Romero Diana, Rosenberg Dori E
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Division of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2025 May;39(4):627-636. doi: 10.1177/08901171241302137. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
PurposeWe explored intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, and the goals and reminder strategies participants chose to reduce sitting.ApproachMixed methods approach leveraging data collected during study coaching and fidelity monitoring.SettingA successful 6-month randomized controlled trial of a sedentary behavior (SB) intervention for adults ≥60 years in Washington, USA.ParticipantsN = 283 (140 intervention, 143 attention control); mean age 69, 66% women, 69% Non-Hispanic White.InterventionTheory-based SB reduction intervention structured around phone-based health coaching and goal setting. Attention control received equal coaching on non-SB health topics.MethodCoaches tracked all participant goals, and 8% of visits were randomly observed and fidelity coded using a structured template. Participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire at study end. Goals data were qualitatively grouped by reminder strategy and topic. Fidelity and satisfaction data were summarized and compared by study arm using two-sided paired t-tests.ResultsBoth participants' satisfaction (>90% satisfied, between-group = .195) and coach fidelity to intervention content and techniques were high (96% sessions set SMART goals, = .343) across both arms. Intervention participants primarily set goals leveraging outward (e.g., fitness band prompts) and habit (e.g., adding standing to a daily meal) reminder strategies highly tailored to individual preferences and lifestyle.ConclusionParticipants' SB-related goals varied widely, suggesting tailored intervention approaches are important to change sitting behavior, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions.
目的
我们探讨了干预的保真度、参与者满意度,以及参与者为减少久坐而选择的目标和提醒策略。
方法
采用混合方法,利用在研究指导和保真度监测期间收集的数据。
背景
在美国华盛顿州,针对60岁及以上成年人进行的一项成功的为期6个月的久坐行为(SB)干预随机对照试验。
参与者
N = 283(140名干预组,143名注意力控制组);平均年龄69岁,66%为女性,69%为非西班牙裔白人。
干预
基于理论的减少久坐行为干预,围绕电话健康指导和目标设定构建。注意力控制组在非久坐行为健康主题上接受了同等的指导。
方法
指导人员跟踪所有参与者的目标,8%的访视被随机观察,并使用结构化模板对保真度进行编码。参与者在研究结束时完成一份满意度问卷。目标数据按提醒策略和主题进行定性分组。使用双侧配对t检验按研究组对保真度和满意度数据进行汇总和比较。
结果
两组参与者的满意度都很高(>90%满意,组间差异 = 0.195),并且指导人员对干预内容和技术的保真度也很高(96%的课程设定了具体、可衡量、可实现、相关联、有时限的目标,差异 = 0.343)。干预组参与者主要利用外部(如健身手环提示)和习惯(如在日常用餐时增加站立)提醒策略设定目标,这些策略高度符合个人偏好和生活方式。
结论
参与者与久坐行为相关的目标差异很大,这表明量身定制的干预方法对于改变久坐行为很重要,特别是对于患有慢性病的老年人。