Fox Claire, Deakin Jo
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2025 Mar;76(2):316-335. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13164. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
The conventional understanding of resilience often portrays it as a positive outcome emerging from adverse situations. This perspective frequently shapes interventions aimed at bolstering resilience among individuals considered to be in need. Drawing upon data from a European study, this paper contends that young people's apparent 'latent rejection' of favourable opportunities, or their deliberate choice to remain in precarious situations despite having some agency, should be recontextualised as unconventional but valid expressions of resilience. Instead of framing resilience solely as an aspirational concept, we propose a reframing that emphasises its role in coping with and surviving challenging circumstances. Furthermore, we advocate for the adoption of Mason's 'safe-uncertainty' model to foster a more practical form of resilience. This approach towards a more sustainable resilience could be valuable in other fields dealing with those populations labelled as 'vulnerable', 'problematic' or 'disadvantaged', and it can, we argue, enhance decision-making skills, and promote the development of robust support networks.
对复原力的传统理解通常将其描绘为逆境中产生的积极结果。这种观点常常塑造了旨在增强那些被认为有需要的个体复原力的干预措施。基于一项欧洲研究的数据,本文认为,年轻人对有利机会明显的“潜在拒绝”,或者他们尽管有一定能力却故意选择留在不稳定状况中的行为,应被重新理解为复原力的非传统但有效的表现形式。我们提议,不应仅将复原力界定为一个理想概念,而是要重新构建,强调其在应对和挺过具有挑战性的环境中的作用。此外,我们主张采用梅森的“安全不确定性”模型来培育一种更具实践性的复原力形式。这种追求更具可持续性复原力的方法,在处理那些被贴上“易受伤害”“有问题”或“处于不利地位”标签的人群的其他领域可能很有价值,而且我们认为,它可以提高决策技能,并促进强大支持网络的发展。