Queiroz Emerson Ferreira, Guillarme Davy, Wolfender Jean-Luc
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, CMU - Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland (ISPSO), University of Geneva, CMU - Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Phytochem Rev. 2024;23(5):1415-1442. doi: 10.1007/s11101-024-09928-w. Epub 2024 May 6.
The isolation of pure compounds from extracts represents a key step common to all investigations of natural product (NP) research. Isolation methods have gone through a remarkable evolution. Current approaches combine powerful metabolite profiling methods for compounds annotation with omics mining results and/or bioassay for bioactive NPs/biomarkers priorisation. Targeted isolation of prioritized NPs is performed using high-resolution chromatographic methods that closely match those used for analytical profiling. Considerable progress has been made by the introduction of innovative stationary phases providing remarkable selectivity for efficient NPs isolation. Today, efficient separation conditions determined at the analytical scale using high- or ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography can be optimized via HPLC modelling software and efficiently transferred to the semi-preparative scale by chromatographic calculation. This ensures similar selectivity at both the analytical and preparative scales and provides a precise separation prediction. High-resolution conditions at the preparative scale can notably be granted using optimized sample preparation and dry load sample introduction. Monitoring by ultraviolet, mass spectrometry, and or universal systems such as evaporative light scattering detectors and nuclear magnetic resonance allows to precisely guide the isolation or trigger the collection of specific NPs with different structural scaffolds. Such approaches can be applied at different scales depending on the amounts of NPs to be isolated. This review will showcase recent research to highlight both the potential and constraints of using these cutting-edge technologies for the isolation of plant and microorganism metabolites. Several strategies involving their application will be examined and critically discussed.
从提取物中分离出纯化合物是天然产物(NP)研究所有调查中共同的关键步骤。分离方法经历了显著的演变。当前的方法将用于化合物注释的强大代谢物谱分析方法与组学挖掘结果和/或用于生物活性NP/生物标志物优先级排序的生物测定相结合。使用与分析谱分析所用方法紧密匹配的高分辨率色谱方法对优先NP进行靶向分离。通过引入创新的固定相,在高效NP分离方面具有显著的选择性,取得了相当大的进展。如今,使用高效液相色谱或超高效液相色谱在分析规模上确定的高效分离条件可以通过HPLC建模软件进行优化,并通过色谱计算有效地转移到半制备规模。这确保了在分析和制备规模上具有相似的选择性,并提供了精确的分离预测。通过优化样品制备和干载样品引入,可以显著实现制备规模的高分辨率条件。通过紫外、质谱和/或通用系统(如蒸发光散射检测器和核磁共振)进行监测,可以精确指导分离或触发收集具有不同结构支架的特定NP。根据要分离的NP的量,这些方法可以在不同规模上应用。本综述将展示最近的研究,以突出使用这些前沿技术分离植物和微生物代谢物的潜力和局限性。将研究并批判性地讨论涉及它们应用的几种策略。