Bull N L, Wheeler E F
Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1986 Feb;40(1):60-6.
A sample of 30 volunteers from a population of 100 Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) civil servants took part in a series of dietary assessments. Food frequency interview, 24-hour dietary recalls, 7-day weighed food record, duplicate diet analysis and 28-day household food purchase records were all used to estimate intakes of energy and a range of nutrients. When results for energy, fat and iron, using the five different methods, were compared there appeared to be systematic differences between methods. The highest results came from food purchase records for the women and from food frequency interviews for the men. Lowest results came from the duplicate diet analysis for fat and energy but from the 24-hour recall for iron, for men and women alike. The implications of these findings, together with possible explanations for them, are discussed.
从100名农业、渔业和食品部(MAFF)公务员群体中抽取的30名志愿者参与了一系列饮食评估。食物频率访谈、24小时饮食回顾、7天称重食物记录、双份饮食分析以及28天家庭食物购买记录均被用于估计能量和一系列营养素的摄入量。当使用五种不同方法得出的能量、脂肪和铁的结果进行比较时,各方法之间似乎存在系统性差异。女性的最高结果来自食物购买记录,男性的最高结果来自食物频率访谈。脂肪和能量的最低结果来自双份饮食分析,但铁的最低结果,无论男性还是女性,均来自24小时回顾。本文讨论了这些发现的意义以及对其可能的解释。