• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血糖变异性对舒张性心力衰竭和2型糖尿病的预后影响:见解与1年死亡率机器学习预测模型

Prognostic effects of glycaemic variability on diastolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights and 1-year mortality machine learning prediction model.

作者信息

Yang Zhenkun, Li Yuanjie, Liu Yang, Zhong Ziyi, Ditchfield Coleen, Guo Taipu, Yang Mingjuan, Chen Yang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Nov 23;16(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01534-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13098-024-01534-2
PMID:39578908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11585110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diastolic heart failure (DHF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often coexist, causing increased mortality rates. Glycaemic variability (GV) exacerbates cardiovascular complications, but its impact on outcomes in patients with DHF and T2DM remains unclear. This study examined the relationships between GV with mortality outcomes, and developed a machine learning (ML) model for long-term mortality in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with DHF and T2DM were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with admissions (2008-2019) as primary analysis cohort and admissions (2020-2022) as external validation cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the associations of GV with 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year all-cause mortality. The primary analysis cohort was split into training and internal validation cohorts, then developing ML models for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in training cohort, which were validated using the internal and external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

2,128 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in primary analysis cohort (meidian age 71.0years [IQR: 62.0-79.0]; 46.9% male), 498 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in the external validation cohort (meidian age 75.0years [IQR: 67.0-81.0]; 54.0% male). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that high GV tertiles were associated with higher risk of 90-day (T2: HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.93; T3: HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.48-2.60), 1-year (T2: HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.53; T3: HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.26-1.89), and 3-year (T2: HR 1.31, 95%CI: 1.10-1.56; T3: HR 1.48, 95%CI 1.23-1.77) all-cause mortality, compared with lowest GV tertile. Chronic kidney disease, creatinine, potassium, haemoglobin, and white blood cell were identified as mediators of GV and 1-year all-cause mortality. Additionally, GV and other clinical features were pre-selected to construct ML models. The random forest model performed best, with AUC (0.770) and G-mean (0.591) in internal validation, with AUC (0.753) and G-mean (0.599) in external validation.

CONCLUSION

GV was determined as an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with DHF and T2DM, with a potential intervention threshold around 25.0%. The ML model incorporating GV demonstrated strong predictive performance for 1-year all-cause mortality, highlighting its importance in early risk stratification management of these patients.

摘要

背景

舒张性心力衰竭(DHF)与2型糖尿病(T2DM)常并存,导致死亡率增加。血糖变异性(GV)会加剧心血管并发症,但其对DHF和T2DM患者预后的影响仍不明确。本研究探讨了GV与死亡率结局之间的关系,并开发了一种用于预测这些患者长期死亡率的机器学习(ML)模型。

方法

从重症监护医学信息数据库IV中纳入DHF和T2DM患者,将2008 - 2019年的入院患者作为主要分析队列,2020 - 2022年的入院患者作为外部验证队列。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型和受限立方样条分析来评估GV与90天、1年和3年全因死亡率的关联。将主要分析队列分为训练队列和内部验证队列,然后在训练队列中开发用于预测1年全因死亡率的ML模型,并使用内部和外部验证队列进行验证。

结果

主要分析队列纳入了2128例DHF和T2DM患者(中位年龄71.0岁[四分位间距:62.0 - 79.0];46.9%为男性),外部验证队列纳入了498例DHF和T2DM患者(中位年龄75.0岁[四分位间距:67.0 - 81.0];54.0%为男性)。多变量Cox比例风险模型显示,与最低GV三分位数相比,高GV三分位数与90天(T2:风险比[HR] 1.45,95%置信区间[CI] 1.09 - 1.93;T3:HR 1.96,95%CI 1.48 - 2.60)、1年(T2:HR 1.25,95%CI 1.02 - 1.53;T3:HR 1.54,95%CI 1.26 - 1.89)和3年(T2:HR 1.31,95%CI:1.10 - 1.56;T3:HR 1.48,95%CI 1.23 - 1.77)全因死亡率的较高风险相关。慢性肾脏病、肌酐、钾、血红蛋白和白细胞被确定为GV与1年全因死亡率之间的中介因素。此外,预先选择GV和其他临床特征来构建ML模型。随机森林模型表现最佳,内部验证中的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.770,几何均值(G - mean)为0.591,外部验证中的AUC为0.753,G - mean为0.599。

结论

GV被确定为DHF和T2DM患者短期和长期全因死亡率的独立危险因素,潜在干预阈值约为25.0%。纳入GV的ML模型对1年全因死亡率具有较强的预测性能,突出了其在这些患者早期风险分层管理中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/75ae30bf0f68/13098_2024_1534_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/b2593c226f66/13098_2024_1534_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/4ec52eeb777a/13098_2024_1534_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/e4c24f260e5d/13098_2024_1534_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/b12bd97469a5/13098_2024_1534_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/010e7f0af6ec/13098_2024_1534_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/f436ec0b7cd2/13098_2024_1534_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/75ae30bf0f68/13098_2024_1534_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/b2593c226f66/13098_2024_1534_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/4ec52eeb777a/13098_2024_1534_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/e4c24f260e5d/13098_2024_1534_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/b12bd97469a5/13098_2024_1534_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/010e7f0af6ec/13098_2024_1534_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/f436ec0b7cd2/13098_2024_1534_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/11585110/75ae30bf0f68/13098_2024_1534_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic effects of glycaemic variability on diastolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights and 1-year mortality machine learning prediction model.血糖变异性对舒张性心力衰竭和2型糖尿病的预后影响:见解与1年死亡率机器学习预测模型
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Nov 23;16(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01534-2.
2
Prognostic value of glycaemic variability for mortality in critically ill atrial fibrillation patients and mortality prediction model using machine learning.血糖变异性对危重症房颤患者死亡率的预后价值及基于机器学习的死亡率预测模型。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Nov 26;23(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02521-7.
3
Exploring the prognostic impact of triglyceride-glucose index in critically ill patients with first-ever stroke: insights from traditional methods and machine learning-based mortality prediction.探索甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对首次发生卒中的危重症患者的预后影响:来自传统方法和基于机器学习的死亡率预测的见解
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02538-y.
4
Simultaneous assessment of stress hyperglycemia ratio and glycemic variability to predict mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC-IV database.同时评估应激性高血糖比值和血糖变异性预测冠心病患者死亡率:来自 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 9;23(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02146-w.
5
Development and validation of a prognostic model for critically ill type 2 diabetes patients in ICU based on composite inflammatory indicators.基于复合炎症指标的ICU中重症2型糖尿病患者预后模型的建立与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87731-z.
6
Glycemic variability and its association with short and long term clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with cerebral hemorrhage.脑出血重症患者的血糖变异性及其与短期和长期临床结局的关联
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92415-9.
7
Higher long-term visit-to-visit glycemic variability predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus.较高的长期血糖变异性预示着糖尿病患者新发心房颤动。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jul 23;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01341-3.
8
Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM, BC, NO, and O: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.长期暴露于低水平 PM、BC、NO 和 O 对死亡率和发病率的影响:ELAPSE 项目中欧洲队列的分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 Sep;2021(208):1-127.
9
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
10
Prediction of 30-day mortality in heart failure patients with hypoxic hepatitis: Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model.缺氧性肝炎所致心力衰竭患者30天死亡率的预测:一种可解释机器学习模型的开发与外部验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 28;9:1035675. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035675. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the relationship between NHHR and the degree of coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes.探讨急性冠状动脉综合征患者中性粒细胞与高密度脂蛋白比值(NHHR)与冠状动脉狭窄程度之间的关系。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05066-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical performance strongly predicts all-cause mortality risk in a real-world population of older diabetic patients: machine learning approach for mortality risk stratification.在真实世界中老年糖尿病患者人群中,体能表现可强烈预测全因死亡率风险:用于死亡率风险分层的机器学习方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 30;15:1359482. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1359482. eCollection 2024.
2
Predicting stroke in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning: A report from the KERALA-AF registry, with external validation in the APHRS-AF registry.使用机器学习预测亚洲房颤患者的中风:来自喀拉拉邦房颤注册研究的报告,并在亚太心律学会房颤注册研究中进行外部验证。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Apr;49(4):102456. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102456. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
3
Key indices of glycaemic variability for application in diabetes clinical practice.用于糖尿病临床实践的血糖变异性关键指标。
Diabetes Metab. 2023 Nov;49(6):101488. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2023.101488. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?射血分数保留的心力衰竭伴或不伴糖尿病患者中的肥胖:危险因素还是无辜的旁观者?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Sep 6;30(12):1247-1254. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad140.
5
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
Insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination improves glycaemic variability and control without increasing hypoglycaemia.精氨酸胰岛素/利西那肽固定比例复方制剂改善血糖变异性和控制而不增加低血糖。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):726-731. doi: 10.1111/dom.13580. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
7
The effect on glycaemic control of low-volume high-intensity interval training versus endurance training in individuals with type 2 diabetes.低容量高强度间歇训练与耐力训练对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1131-1139. doi: 10.1111/dom.13198. Epub 2018 Jan 31.