• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林适宜户外游憩的指标概念框架。

A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation.

作者信息

Lehto Carl, Sirén Anders, Hedblom Marcus, Fredman Peter

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

Universidad Intercultural de las Nacionalidades y Pueblos Indígenas Amawtay Wasi, Av. Colón E5-56 y Juan León Mera, Edif. Ave María, Torre B, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

Ambio. 2025 Feb;54(2):184-197. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02091-8. Epub 2024 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-024-02091-8
PMID:39579265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662111/
Abstract

Forests' ability to provide opportunities for recreation is an important ecosystem service. This has prompted attempts to create indicators to assess forests' suitability for recreation, although hitherto with limited success. This study introduces a novel framework for indicators of potential and realised recreational values of forests, with a primary focus on Sweden and Fennoscandia. We divided forest attributes into intrinsic qualities (i.e. the structure and composition of the forest), extrinsic qualities (i.e. the location of the forest in relation to other components of the landscape), and facilitation qualities (i.e. the presence of recreational infrastructure). Using Fennoscandia as a case study, we performed a literature review to find specific indicators of recreational values, as well as evaluate the current availability of spatial data suitable to map the forest qualities on a national scale. The most important intrinsic quality we identified was tree size/age, whereas for extrinsic quality it was proximity to water. Systematic monitoring of recreational use is essential to estimate realised recreational values. The conceptual framework proved to be a valuable tool for identifying potential indicators, and applying it in other regions is likely to yield useful outcomes.

摘要

森林提供休闲机会的能力是一项重要的生态系统服务。这促使人们尝试创建指标来评估森林对休闲的适宜性,尽管迄今为止成效有限。本研究引入了一个关于森林潜在和实际休闲价值指标的新框架,主要聚焦于瑞典和芬诺斯坎迪亚地区。我们将森林属性分为内在品质(即森林的结构和组成)、外在品质(即森林相对于景观其他组成部分的位置)和便利品质(即休闲基础设施的存在情况)。以芬诺斯坎迪亚地区为案例研究,我们进行了文献综述,以找到休闲价值的具体指标,并评估目前在国家层面绘制森林品质所需空间数据的可得性。我们确定的最重要的内在品质是树木大小/年龄,而外在品质则是靠近水源。对休闲利用进行系统监测对于估算实际休闲价值至关重要。该概念框架被证明是识别潜在指标的宝贵工具,将其应用于其他地区可能会产生有益成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11662111/313739ba92ba/13280_2024_2091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11662111/313739ba92ba/13280_2024_2091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11662111/313739ba92ba/13280_2024_2091_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation.森林适宜户外游憩的指标概念框架。
Ambio. 2025 Feb;54(2):184-197. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02091-8. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Characterizing, mapping and valuing the demand for forest recreation using crowdsourced social media data.利用众包社交媒体数据描述、绘制和评估森林游憩需求。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272406. eCollection 2022.
3
Large carnivores and naturalness affect forest recreational value.大型食肉动物和自然状态会影响森林的游憩价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 11;12(1):13692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17862-0.
4
Recreational Use of the Countryside: No Evidence that High Nature Value Enhances a Key Ecosystem Service.乡村的休闲利用:没有证据表明高自然价值能提升关键生态系统服务。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165043. eCollection 2016.
5
What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands.我们对森林抱有何期待?公众诉求的欧洲视角。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Mar 1;209:139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.032. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
The effect of forest composition on outdoor recreation.森林组成对户外休闲的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;364:121397. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121397. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
7
Exploring the influence of activity participation on the economic value of nature-based recreation in the Sierra Nevada.探讨活动参与对内华达山脉自然娱乐的经济价值的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121081. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121081. Epub 2024 May 11.
8
Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in a primeval mountain forest: From natural patterns to landscape planning and forest management recommendations.原始山林中与树木相关的微生境的空间分布:从自然模式到景观规划及森林管理建议
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jan 15;960:178319. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178319. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
9
Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure.正式和非正式休闲步道对城市森林损失和树木结构的影响差异。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Aug 15;159:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
Changes in gross ecosystem product and its response to land use changes in forest resource dominant regions: A case study of Zixi County, Jiangxi Province, China.森林资源主导区域总生态系统产品变化及其对土地利用变化的响应:以江西省资溪县为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Aug;35(8):2197-2205. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202408.020.

本文引用的文献

1
Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits.蓝色空间、健康与幸福感:潜在益处的叙述性综述与综合
Environ Res. 2020 Dec;191:110169. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
Health Benefits Derived from Forest: A Review.森林带来的健康效益:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 23;17(17):6125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176125.
3
Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective.自然与心理健康:生态系统服务视角。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 24;5(7):eaax0903. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space.并非所有绿地都一样:生物多样性预示着城市绿地带来的心理恢复效益。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320. eCollection 2018.
5
Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas.美国保护区内普遍存在噪声污染。
Science. 2017 May 5;356(6337):531-533. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4783.
6
Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective.林业对北方森林的影响:生态系统服务视角。
Ambio. 2017 Nov;46(7):743-755. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0919-5. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
7
Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale.城市绿地指标的制定及公共卫生依据。
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Mar;44(2):159-67. doi: 10.1177/1403494815615444. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
8
Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health.噪声对健康的听觉和非听觉影响。
Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
Effects of changed aircraft noise exposure on experiential qualities of outdoor recreational areas.飞机噪声暴露变化对户外休闲区体验质量的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Oct;7(10):3739-59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103739. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.绿地空间的心理益处随着生物多样性的增加而提升。
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):390-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149.