• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚维酮碘和硝酸银在消除钛表面生长的葡萄球菌生物膜方面同样有效:一项体外分析。

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate are equally effective in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm grown on a titanium surface: an in-vitro analysis.

作者信息

Semeshchenko D, Veiga M F, Visus M, Farinati A, Huespe I, Buttaro M A, Slullitel P A

机构信息

'Sir John Charnley' Hip Surgery Unit, Institute of Orthopaedics 'Carlos E. Ottolenghi', Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Bacteriology Department, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, ACK1199, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2025 Jan;155:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.012. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.012
PMID:39579939
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the irrigation solution and concentration that should be used when performing a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery.

AIM

To determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of five antibacterial solutions and to compare their efficacies in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm embedded on a titanium surface.

METHODS

Meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ATCC standard strains were grown over porous Ti-6Al-4V acetabular screw-caps. Antibacterial solutions were povidone-iodine, rifampicin, silver nitrate, copper sulphate, and chlorhexidine. MBEC values were calculated for MSSA and MRSA. After 24 h, screw-caps were exposed for 3 min to each solution. Bacterial separation from each specimen was performed with vortex agitation and footprint on agar plate in triplicate. Colony forming units (cfu) were counted pre- and post-agitation, and the delta of cfu/mL was calculated for each solution. A threefold log reduction in cfu was considered a measure of solution efficacy. Comparison between groups was made with Fisher's test.

FINDINGS

MBEC values for MSSA and MRSA, respectively, were as follows: 8000 μg/mL and 16,000 μg/mL for povidone-iodine; 64 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL for rifampicin; 10,000 μg/mL and 5120 μg/mL for silver nitrate; 900 μg/mL and 900 μg/mL for copper sulphate; 16 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL for chlorhexidine. Rifampicin, copper sulphate and chlorhexidine were ineffective against MSSA and MRSA biofilm compared with povidone-iodine (P<0.01) and silver nitrate (P=0.015) that had a delta cfu reduction >8 log. Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate showed negative footprints without visible MSSA (P=0.005) and MRSA (P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate were the only irrigating solutions capable of eradicating at least 99.9% of 24-h biofilm.

摘要

背景

在进行清创、抗生素应用和植入物保留(DAIR)手术时,对于应使用的冲洗液及其浓度尚无共识。

目的

确定五种抗菌溶液的最低生物膜根除浓度(MBEC),并比较它们在根除钛表面葡萄球菌生物膜方面的效果。

方法

将甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)ATCC标准菌株接种在多孔Ti-6Al-4V髋臼螺帽上。抗菌溶液为聚维酮碘、利福平、硝酸银、硫酸铜和氯己定。计算MSSA和MRSA的MBEC值。24小时后,将螺帽在每种溶液中暴露3分钟。通过涡旋振荡从每个标本中分离细菌,并在琼脂平板上进行三次印迹。在振荡前后计数菌落形成单位(cfu),并计算每种溶液的cfu/mL差值。cfu减少三倍对数被视为溶液效果的衡量标准。采用Fisher检验进行组间比较。

结果

MSSA和MRSA的MBEC值分别如下:聚维酮碘为8000μg/mL和16000μg/mL;利福平为64μg/mL和128μg/mL;硝酸银为10000μg/mL和5120μg/mL;硫酸铜为900μg/mL和900μg/mL;氯己定为16μg/mL和32μg/mL。与聚维酮碘(P<0.01)和硝酸银(P=0.015)相比,利福平、硫酸铜和氯己定对MSSA和MRSA生物膜无效,聚维酮碘和硝酸银的cfu减少量>8对数。聚维酮碘和硝酸银显示无可见MSSA(P=0.005)和MRSA(P=0.014)的阴性印迹。

结论

聚维酮碘和硝酸银是仅有的能够根除至少99.9%的24小时生物膜的冲洗液。

相似文献

1
Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate are equally effective in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm grown on a titanium surface: an in-vitro analysis.聚维酮碘和硝酸银在消除钛表面生长的葡萄球菌生物膜方面同样有效:一项体外分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2025 Jan;155:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.012. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
The AAHKS Best Podium Presentation Research Award: Comparing the Efficacy of Irrigation Solutions on Staphylococcal Biofilm Formed on Arthroplasty Surfaces.AAHKS 最佳演讲研究奖:比较不同冲洗液对人工关节表面形成的葡萄球菌生物膜的疗效。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S26-S32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.033. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Combining povidone-iodine with vancomycin can be beneficial in reducing early biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus on titanium surface.聚维酮碘联合万古霉素有利于减少耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌在钛表面的早期生物膜形成。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 May;111(5):1133-1141. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35220. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Not All Antiseptic Solutions Are Equivalent in Removing Biofilm: A Comparison Across Different Orthopaedic Surfaces.并非所有抗菌溶液在去除生物膜方面都等效:不同骨科表面的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Jan 15;107(2):127-133. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01118. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Chlorhexidine Antiseptic Irrigation Eradicates Staphylococcus epidermidis From Biofilm: An In Vitro Study.洗必泰抗菌冲洗液可清除生物膜中的表皮葡萄球菌:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):648-653. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000052.
6
Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.纳米颗粒超声处理在消除钛表面金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜方面优于传统冲洗液:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2729-2734. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03982-y. Epub 2024 May 18.
7
The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?感染的聚丙烯网:生物膜何时形成,哪种消毒剂最有效地清除它?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S294-S299. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.081. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
Iodine-lithium-alpha-dextrin (ILαD) against Staphylococcus aureus skin infections: a comparative study of in-vitro bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity between ILαD and povidone-iodine.碘-锂-α-糊精(ILαD)治疗金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤感染:ILαD 与聚维酮碘体外杀菌活性和细胞毒性的比较研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Feb;98(2):134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Povidone-iodine ointment demonstrates in vitro efficacy against biofilm formation.聚维酮碘软膏显示出体外抗生物膜形成的功效。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):172-179. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12578. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
10
Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test.使用表面试验评估洗必泰和聚维酮碘对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素粪肠球菌的活性。
J Hosp Infect. 2000 Oct;46(2):147-52. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0805.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing the complexities of bacterial biocide susceptibility and in vitro biocide adaptation methodologies.综述细菌对杀生剂敏感性及体外杀生剂适应性方法的复杂性。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025 May 13;3(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s44259-025-00108-0.
2
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Wound Irrigation Solutions in the Periprosthetic Joint Infection Microenvironment In Vitro and Ex Vivo.五种伤口冲洗液在人工关节感染微环境中的体内外抗菌效果
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;14(1):25. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010025.