Human Performance Laboratory, Integrative Nutrition and Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology MSC 2302, James Madison University, 261 Bluestone Dr., Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Sleep Breath. 2024 Nov 25;29(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03175-1.
Physical activity (PA) guidelines suggest a link between PA, sedentary time, and sleep quality (SQ). Step cadence is an emerging proxy for PA intensity, with zero cadence (ZC) indicating sedentary time. No research has explored the relationship between ZC and SQ. This study examines the relationship between ZC and SC, compared to traditional PA and sedentary metrics, all measured via accelerometry.
Sleep and PA was assessed in 138 adults (53 male, 85 female, age = 23.5 ± 8.0 year.) via accelerometry. Sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous intensity PA, and ZC minutes per day were measured. SQ variables included sleep efficiency (SE), total sleep time (TST), and minutes of awake time after sleep onset (WASO). Correlation analysis and analysis of covariance was used to assess relationships between study variables and to assess differences in PA and sedentary behavior between normal and poor sleepers.
Sedentary time was negatively associated with SE (r = -0.24, P < 0.05) and TST (r = -0.51, P < 0.001). ZC was negatively associated with SE (r = -0.25, P < 0.05), TST (r = -0.39, P < 0.001) and positively associated with WASO (r = 0.17, P < 0.001). Poor sleepers accumulated greater ZC minutes than normal sleepers when categorized by SE (555.9 ± 69.1 vs. 521.6 ± 83.7, P = 0.02)) or TST (570.4 ± 77.7 vs. 524.5 ± 76.7, P < 0.01).
Results suggest that zero cadence minutes is a viable metric for assessing sedentary time and may be of greater utility to more traditional measure of sedentary time.
体力活动 (PA) 指南表明 PA、久坐时间和睡眠质量 (SQ) 之间存在联系。步频是 PA 强度的一个新兴替代指标,零步频 (ZC) 表示久坐时间。目前还没有研究探讨 ZC 与 SQ 之间的关系。本研究通过加速度计比较 ZC 与 SC 以及传统 PA 和久坐时间测量指标,探讨 ZC 与 SQ 之间的关系。
通过加速度计评估 138 名成年人(53 名男性,85 名女性,年龄 23.5 ± 8.0 岁)的睡眠和 PA。每天测量久坐、轻量、中量、剧烈强度 PA 和 ZC 分钟数。SQ 变量包括睡眠效率 (SE)、总睡眠时间 (TST) 和睡眠后觉醒时间 (WASO)。采用相关分析和协方差分析评估研究变量之间的关系,并评估正常和睡眠不佳者之间 PA 和久坐行为的差异。
久坐时间与 SE(r = -0.24,P < 0.05)和 TST(r = -0.51,P < 0.001)呈负相关。ZC 与 SE(r = -0.25,P < 0.05)、TST(r = -0.39,P < 0.001)呈负相关,与 WASO(r = 0.17,P < 0.001)呈正相关。根据 SE(555.9 ± 69.1 vs. 521.6 ± 83.7,P = 0.02)或 TST(570.4 ± 77.7 vs. 524.5 ± 76.7,P < 0.01)分类,睡眠不佳者的 ZC 分钟数多于正常睡眠者。
结果表明,零步频分钟数是评估久坐时间的一种可行指标,可能比传统的久坐时间测量指标更有用。