Bharadwaj Arthi D, Datta Avisek, Bhat Pooja, Lobo-Chan Ann-Marie
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
School of Public Health, Epidemiology/Biostatistics Division, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2025 May;33(4):578-584. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2427257. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
To utilize pharmacy dispenses to investigate adherence rates to immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) for the treatment of noninfectious inflammatory eye disease (IED), impact of adherence on disease control, factors associated with nonadherence, and association between adherence in the medical record and pharmacy dispenses.
Retrospective medical chart review was conducted on patients followed for at least 2 years in the uveitis clinic. Appointment and lab attendance, and provider documentation, determined adherence through the medical record. Dispense history was obtained from pharmacies, and IMT infusion dates were noted. Disease control was determined by clinical exam findings.
Sixty-three patients qualified for the study. The mean age was 49 years (SD = 19.4), 76.2% were female, 36.5% were Black/African American, and 96.8% were taking 1 or 2 IMTs. Pharmacy refill data was collected from 58 patients to determine an adherence rate (AR) of 63.9%. Thirty-nine patients (67.2%) had an average AR < 85% by pharmacy refill data and were thus deemed nonadherent. The majority of patients (86.2%) achieved ocular inflammation control. Nonadherence was 4.72 times more likely in patients taking >1 medication compared to one medication alone (95% CI: 1.02-21.86, = 0.047). Comparing adherence from information in the medical record to pharmacy refill data, 71.6% of IMT comparisons were congruent ( < 0.0001).
Patients taking IMT for >2 years demonstrated an AR < 65% based on pharmacy data. Most patients achieved ocular quiescence. Using pharmacy information as an objective measure of adherence correlates with assessing adherence through medical record information.
利用药房配药情况调查免疫抑制治疗(IMT)用于治疗非感染性炎症性眼病(IED)的依从率、依从性对疾病控制的影响、与不依从相关的因素以及病历中的依从性与药房配药之间的关联。
对葡萄膜炎诊所随访至少2年的患者进行回顾性病历审查。通过预约和实验室检查出勤情况以及医生记录,根据病历确定依从性。从药房获取配药历史,并记录IMT输注日期。通过临床检查结果确定疾病控制情况。
63名患者符合研究条件。平均年龄为49岁(标准差=19.4),76.2%为女性,36.5%为黑人/非裔美国人,96.8%的患者正在服用1种或2种IMT药物。从58名患者收集药房再填充数据以确定依从率(AR)为63.9%。根据药房再填充数据,39名患者(67.2%)的平均AR<85%,因此被视为不依从。大多数患者(86.2%)实现了眼部炎症控制。与仅服用一种药物的患者相比,服用>1种药物的患者不依从的可能性高4.72倍(95%置信区间:1.02-21.86,P=0.047)。将病历中的依从性信息与药房再填充数据进行比较,71.6%的IMT比较结果一致(P<0.0001)。
根据药房数据,接受IMT治疗超过2年的患者的AR<65%。大多数患者实现了眼部静止。将药房信息用作依从性的客观衡量标准与通过病历信息评估依从性相关。