Black Melissa H, Bölte Sven
Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Department of Women's and Children's Health, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Feb;58(2):311-313. doi: 10.1002/eat.24335. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
The recent mixed-methods review by Nimbley et al. (2025) raises important and concerning, yet not unexpected, insights into the usefulness of eating disorder (ED) treatment for autistic populations. In their review, Nimbley et al. find that ED treatments may be less effective for autistic groups, proposing a need for a greater understanding of ED in autistic populations, and more autism-informed measures and interventions for EDs. We take the opportunity in this commentary to further expand on the next steps that must be taken to inform future ED interventions for autistic populations. We reflect on similar observations of the impact of co-occurrence on intervention efficacy in autism, draw on contemporary movements in relation to interventions in the context of autism, and align with the conclusions of Nimbley et al., who propose that future ED interventions may need to be tailored to autistic populations. We present participatory and co-creation research approaches as a means to achieve this.
尼姆布利等人(2025年)最近进行的混合方法综述,对饮食失调(ED)治疗对自闭症群体的效用提出了重要且令人担忧但并不意外的见解。在他们的综述中,尼姆布利等人发现,ED治疗对自闭症群体可能效果较差,提出需要更深入地了解自闭症群体中的饮食失调情况,以及针对饮食失调采取更多基于自闭症知识的措施和干预方法。我们借此评论机会,进一步阐述为自闭症群体的未来饮食失调干预提供信息必须采取的后续步骤。我们思考了关于共病对自闭症干预效果影响的类似观察结果,借鉴了自闭症背景下干预措施的当代发展趋势,并认同尼姆布利等人的结论,即未来的饮食失调干预可能需要针对自闭症群体进行调整。我们提出参与式和共同创造研究方法作为实现这一目标的手段。