Estraneo Anna, Magliacano Alfonso, De Bellis Francesco, Amantini Aldo, Lavezzi Susanna, Grippo Antonello
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Via Di Scandicci 269, 80143, Florence, Italy.
Unit of Severe Brain Injury Rehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Neurol Sci. 2025 Apr;46(4):1751-1764. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07875-0. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
Accurate recognition of consciousness level and detection of neurological complications since the intensive care unit are crucial for an appropriate prognostication and tailored treatment in patients with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (DoC).
The present inter-society Consensus Conference aimed at addressing current debates on diagnostic and prognostic procedures.
Twelve working groups involving 22 multidisciplinary professionals (membership of 9 Scientific Societies and 2 patients' family Associations) conducted a systematic literature review focused on 12 questions addressing diagnosis (n = 5) and prognosis (n = 7). The quality of evidence of the included studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. A Jury involving Scientific Societies and patients' family Associations provided recommendations based on the evidence levels and expert opinion.
An overall number of 1,219 papers was screened, and 21 were included in the review. Working groups produced a report on strengths and limits of evidence for each question. The overall suggestion was to use a multimodal assessment combining validated clinical scales, neurophysiological exams, and neuroimaging in diagnostic and prognostic procedure, to guide personalized treatment. A strong recommendation was to use standardized terminologies and diagnostic criteria for ensuring homogeneity and appropriateness in patients management.
This multidisciplinary Consensus Conference provided the first operational recommendations for a good clinical practice procedure for patients with post-anoxic DoC. A periodic review will be necessary based on future evidence from the literature and implementation of the present recommendations.
准确识别意识水平以及自重症监护病房起检测神经并发症,对于缺氧后意识障碍(DoC)患者的恰当预后评估和个性化治疗至关重要。
本次跨学会共识会议旨在解决当前关于诊断和预后程序的争论。
12个工作组,由22名多学科专业人员(9个科学学会和2个患者家属协会的成员)组成,针对12个问题进行了系统的文献综述,这些问题涉及诊断(n = 5)和预后(n = 7)。使用牛津循证医学中心证据水平评估纳入研究的证据质量。一个由科学学会和患者家属协会组成的评审团根据证据水平和专家意见提供了建议。
共筛选了1219篇论文,其中21篇纳入综述。各工作组针对每个问题撰写了一份关于证据优势和局限性的报告。总体建议是在诊断和预后程序中采用多模式评估,结合经过验证的临床量表、神经生理学检查和神经影像学检查,以指导个性化治疗。强烈建议使用标准化术语和诊断标准,以确保患者管理的同质性和适当性。
本次多学科共识会议为缺氧后DoC患者的良好临床实践程序提供了首个实用建议。基于未来文献证据和本建议的实施情况,有必要定期进行审查。