• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习算法在健康政策评估中估算倾向评分的应用:范围综述。

Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Propensity Scores in Health Policy Evaluation: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Knowledge Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88035-972, Brazil.

Piccolo Mental Health, Florianópolis 88035-400, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;21(11):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111484.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21111484
PMID:39595751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11593605/
Abstract

(1) Background: Quasi-experimental design has been widely used in causal inference for health policy impact evaluation. However, due to the non-randomized treatment used, there is great potential for bias in the assessment of the results, which can be reduced by using propensity score (PS) methods. In this context, this article aims to map the literature concerning the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms for propensity score estimation. (2) Methods: A scoping review was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Explore, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Compendex, and gray literature (ProQuest and Google Scholar) databases, based on the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. This scoping review aims to identify ML models and their accuracy and the characteristics of studies on causal inference for health policy impacts, with a specific focus on PS estimation using ML. (3) Results: Seven studies were included in the review from 3018 references searched. In general, tree-based ML models were used for PS estimation. Most of the studies did not show or mention the performance metrics of the selected models, focusing instead on discussing the treatment effects under analysis. (4) Conclusions: Despite important aspects of model development and evaluation being under-reported, this scoping review provides insights into the recent use of ML algorithms in health policy impact evaluation.

摘要

(1) 背景:准实验设计已广泛应用于健康政策影响评估中的因果推断。然而,由于采用了非随机化处理,在评估结果时存在很大的偏差风险,可以通过使用倾向评分(PS)方法来降低。在这种情况下,本文旨在绘制关于使用机器学习(ML)算法进行倾向评分估计的文献图谱。

(2) 方法:根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南,在 PubMed、EMBASE、ACM 数字图书馆、IEEE Explore、LILACS、Web of Science、Scopus、Compendex 和灰色文献(ProQuest 和 Google Scholar)数据库中进行了范围综述。本范围综述旨在确定 ML 模型及其准确性,以及健康政策影响因果推断研究的特征,特别关注使用 ML 进行 PS 估计。

(3) 结果:从搜索到的 3018 篇参考文献中,共纳入了 7 项研究。总体而言,基于树的 ML 模型被用于 PS 估计。大多数研究没有展示或提及所选模型的性能指标,而是专注于讨论分析中的处理效果。

(4) 结论:尽管模型开发和评估的重要方面报告不足,但本范围综述提供了关于 ML 算法在健康政策影响评估中的最新应用的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5813/11593605/945cf8c71dad/ijerph-21-01484-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5813/11593605/945cf8c71dad/ijerph-21-01484-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5813/11593605/945cf8c71dad/ijerph-21-01484-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Propensity Scores in Health Policy Evaluation: A Scoping Review.机器学习算法在健康政策评估中估算倾向评分的应用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;21(11):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111484.
2
Decoding machine learning in nursing research: A scoping review of effective algorithms.解读护理研究中的机器学习:有效算法的范围综述
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):119-129. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13026. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
3
Application of Machine Learning in Multimorbidity Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.机器学习在多病种研究中的应用:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 20;13:e53761. doi: 10.2196/53761.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Machine Learning and Medication Adherence: Scoping Review.机器学习与药物依从性:范围综述
JMIRx Med. 2021 Nov 24;2(4):e26993. doi: 10.2196/26993.
6
Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.基于预后评分的模型平均倾向评分估计方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02350-y.
7
In Silico Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.基于算法的临床决策支持系统的计算机模拟评估:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 16;14:e63875. doi: 10.2196/63875.
8
The Use of Deep Learning and Machine Learning on Longitudinal Electronic Health Records for the Early Detection and Prevention of Diseases: Scoping Review.深度学习和机器学习在纵向电子健康记录中用于疾病的早期检测和预防的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 20;26:e48320. doi: 10.2196/48320.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Availability of Evidence for Predictive Machine Learning Algorithms in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.预测机器学习算法在初级保健中的证据可用性:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432990. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32990.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of cash transfer participation on unhealthy consumption in Brazil.现金转移参与对巴西不健康消费的影响。
Health Policy Open. 2022 Dec 6;4:100087. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100087. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
What is the impact of national public expenditure and its allocation on neonatal and child mortality? A machine learning analysis.国家公共支出及其分配对新生儿和儿童死亡率的影响是什么?一项机器学习分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15683-y.
3
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.
健康决策中的因果证据:因果推断方法和健康决策科学。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Dec 21;20:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/000314. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact assessment of emergency care units on hospitalizations for respiratory system diseases in Brazil.急诊护理单元对巴西呼吸系统疾病住院的影响评估。
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Sep;27(9):3627-3636. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022279.06302022. Epub 2022 May 14.
5
Machine Learning Methods in Health Economics and Outcomes Research-The PALISADE Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.机器学习方法在健康经济学和结果研究中的应用-PALISADE 清单:ISPOR 工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2022 Jul;25(7):1063-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.022.
6
Reflection on modern methods: constructing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) with domain experts for health services research.反思现代方法:为卫生服务研究构建有领域专家参与的有向无环图(DAGs)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 10;51(4):1339-1348. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac135.
7
Heterogeneous Effects of Health Insurance on Rural Children's Health in China: A Causal Machine Learning Approach.健康保险对中国农村儿童健康的异质影响:基于因果机器学习方法的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 12;18(18):9616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189616.
8
Using conventional and machine learning propensity score methods to examine the effectiveness of 12-step group involvement following inpatient addiction treatment.使用传统和机器学习倾向评分方法来检验住院成瘾治疗后 12 步团体参与的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108943. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108943. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Predicting population health with machine learning: a scoping review.利用机器学习预测人群健康:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):e037860. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037860.
10
Effect of a national population-based breast cancer screening policy on participation in mammography and stage at breast cancer diagnosis in Taiwan.国家性基于人口的乳腺癌筛查政策对台湾地区乳腺癌筛查参与度和诊断时乳腺癌分期的影响。
Health Policy. 2020 Apr;124(4):478-485. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 21.