• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回肠造口还纳术能否由外科住院医师安全施行?

Can Ileostomy Reversal Be Safely Performed by Surgical Residents?

机构信息

Chair of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland.

Department of General and Oncological Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 9;60(11):1847. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111847.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60111847
PMID:39597032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11596465/
Abstract

: The growing number of colorectal cancer patients has highlighted the importance of surgical education in colorectal surgery. Despite the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical training, recent changes in the Polish surgical training program have increased the number of intestinal procedures required to be completed by residents. This study aims to assess the safety of ileostomy reversal procedures performed by surgical residents. A multicenter prospective cohort study, the LILEO study, was conducted from October 2022 until December 2023 across 20 Polish surgical departments. The study included 199 patients who underwent ileostomy reversal and were divided into two groups: 139 patients operated by specialist surgeons and 60 patients operated by surgical residents. The primary outcomes measured were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day reoperation rate. Secondary outcomes included the severity of perioperative complications assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification and a focused analysis of loop ileostomy reversal outcomes. The median LOS was significantly shorter in the resident group (5.5 days vs. 6 days, < 0.05). Although the overall complication rate was lower in the resident group (21.7% vs. 33.1% in the specialist surgeon group), this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.105). The 30-day reoperation rate was 3.3% in the resident group and 8.6% in the specialist surgeon group ( = 0.179). In terms of severity, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) were more common in the specialist group ( < 0.05). The analysis of loop ileostomy reversals revealed no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the two groups. Ileostomy reversal procedures performed by surgical residents under supervision are safe and feasible, with outcomes comparable to those performed only by specialist surgeons. These findings support ileostomy reversal as a valuable procedure for developing surgical residents' skills and do not negatively affect postoperative outcomes.

摘要

: 越来越多的结直肠癌患者突显了结直肠外科学术教育的重要性。尽管 COVID-19 大流行对外科培训产生了负面影响,但波兰外科培训计划的最近变化增加了住院医师需要完成的肠操作数量。本研究旨在评估外科住院医师实施回肠造口术逆转术的安全性。一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,即 LILEO 研究,于 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 12 月在波兰的 20 个外科部门进行。该研究纳入了 199 例接受回肠造口术逆转的患者,并分为两组:由专家外科医生进行手术的 139 例患者和由外科住院医师进行手术的 60 例患者。主要结局指标是术后并发症、住院时间(LOS)和 30 天再手术率。次要结局包括使用 Clavien-Dindo 分类评估的围手术期并发症严重程度以及回肠造口术逆转结果的重点分析。住院时间在住院医师组明显缩短(5.5 天比 6 天, < 0.05)。尽管住院医师组的总并发症发生率较低(21.7%比专家外科医生组的 33.1%, = 0.105),但差异无统计学意义。住院医师组的 30 天再手术率为 3.3%,专家外科医生组为 8.6%( = 0.179)。在严重程度方面,专家组更常见轻度并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级 1 和 2)( < 0.05)。两组间回肠造口术逆转的术后结果分析无显著差异。在监督下由外科住院医师进行的回肠造口术逆转是安全可行的,其结果与仅由专家外科医生进行的手术相当。这些发现支持回肠造口术逆转作为培养外科住院医师技能的有价值程序,且不会对术后结果产生负面影响。

相似文献

1
Can Ileostomy Reversal Be Safely Performed by Surgical Residents?回肠造口还纳术能否由外科住院医师安全施行?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 9;60(11):1847. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111847.
2
Preliminary results of Polish national multicenter LILEO study on ileostomy reversal.波兰全国多中心回肠造口术回纳LILEO研究的初步结果。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2024 Feb 8;96(3):26-31. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2679.
3
Timing of Loop Ileostomy Closure Does Not Play a Pivotal Role in Terms of Complications-Results of the Liquidation of iLEOstomy (LILEO) Study.回肠袢式造口关闭的时机在并发症方面并非起关键作用——回肠袢式造口清理(LILEO)研究结果
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 31;14(9):934. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090934.
4
Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme - Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique?增强康复方案下的回肠袢式造口还纳术——吻合技术是吻合器吻合优于手工缝合吗?
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.039. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal - Results from a prospective cohort study.回肠造口还纳术后再次手术的风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.043. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.回肠袢式造口术的早期和晚期关闭:一项回顾性比较结果分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Dec;64(12):30-35.
7
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh in loop-ileostomy reversal: a case-control study.预防性可吸收生物合成网在回肠造口还纳术中的安全性和有效性:一项病例对照研究。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):103-108. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00702-z. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Impact of surgical proficiency levels on postoperative morbidity: a single centre analysis of 558 ileostomy reversals.手术熟练程度对术后发病率的影响:558例回肠造口还纳术的单中心分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3026-6. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Navigating Progress: 8-Year Single-Center Experience With Minimally Invasive Proctectomy and IPAA.导航进展:微创直肠切除术和 IPAA 的 8 年单中心经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Nov 1;67(11):1437-1442. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003465. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
10
The Balance Between Surgical Resident Education and Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Surgical Resident's Performance has No Negative Impact.腹腔镜结直肠手术中外科住院医师教育与患者安全之间的平衡:外科住院医师的表现无负面影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000426.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary results of Polish national multicenter LILEO study on ileostomy reversal.波兰全国多中心回肠造口术回纳LILEO研究的初步结果。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2024 Feb 8;96(3):26-31. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2679.
2
Trends in minimally invasive and open inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of ACGME general surgery case logs.微创和开放腹股沟疝修补术的趋势:ACGME 普通外科手术日志分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2344-2349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10805-y. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
How does the number of training years in pediatric surgery affect appendectomy outcomes?小儿外科学培训年限对阑尾切除术结果有何影响?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Apr 7;39(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05453-7.
4
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.2020年和2040年全球结直肠癌负担:来自全球癌症负担(GLOBOCAN)的发病率和死亡率估计
Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Hand-sewn direct repair versus resection and hand-sewn anastomosis techniques for the reversal of diverting loop ileostomy after lower anterior rectal resection surgery: A randomized clinical trial.经肛门直接修复术与切除吻合术在低位前切除术后回肠造口术反转中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;127(5):798-805. doi: 10.1002/jso.27185. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
General Surgery Resident Complement and Operative Autonomy - Size Matters.普通外科住院医师的数量和手术自主权——规模很重要。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e76-e84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
7
The Science of Anastomotic Healing.吻合口愈合的科学
Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Jun;33(2). doi: 10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100879. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment-Overview.炎症性肠病:临床诊断与外科治疗概述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 21;58(5):567. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050567.
9
COVID-19 and the impact on surgical training and education in Singapore.2019冠状病毒病及其对新加坡外科培训与教育的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 Jan;8(1):e08731. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08731. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
Association Between Operative Autonomy of Surgical Residents and Patient Outcomes.外科住院医师手术自主性与患者结局的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Mar 1;157(3):211-219. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6444.