• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与安慰剂相比,关节内注射透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛更少:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Less Pain with Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis Compared to Placebo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Migliorini Filippo, Maffulli Nicola, Schäfer Luise, Kubach Joshua, Betsch Marcel, Pasurka Mario

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

Department of Life Sciences, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 20;17(11):1557. doi: 10.3390/ph17111557.

DOI:10.3390/ph17111557
PMID:39598466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11597132/
Abstract

The present meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for knee osteoarthritis. The outcomes of interest were the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario McMaster Osteo-Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of intra-articular HA injections versus placebo injections for knee osteoarthritis were accessed in September 2024. Data from 3851 patients were collected. In total, 64% (2467 of 3851 patients) were women, and the mean age of the patients was 63.5 ± 4.9 years. At baseline, good comparability was found for the mean age, BMI, percentage of women, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Studies which reported data from two to four weeks of follow-up evidenced a lower value of the subscales pain ( < 0.0001) and stiffness ( = 0.01) of the WOMAC score. No difference was observed in VAS at rest ( = 0.4), VAS at exercise ( = 0.1), and subscale function ( = 0.4) of the WOMAC score. Studies which reported data from five to eight weeks of follow-up evidenced lower VAS at rest in favour of the HA group ( = 0.01). No difference in the other PROMs of interest was observed: VAS at exercise ( = 0.1), and the subscales pain ( = 0.3), function ( = 0.4), and stiffness ( = 0.4) of the WOMAC score. The current level I of evidence suggests that intra-articular HA injections in the knee might reduce pain in the short term.

摘要

本荟萃分析研究了关节腔内注射透明质酸(HA)治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效。感兴趣的结果指标是视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分。本研究按照2020年PRISMA声明进行。2024年9月检索了所有比较关节腔内注射HA与安慰剂注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。收集了3851例患者的数据。其中,64%(3851例患者中的2467例)为女性,患者的平均年龄为63.5±4.9岁。在基线时,发现平均年龄、体重指数、女性百分比和患者报告结局指标(PROMs)具有良好的可比性。报告随访2至4周数据的研究表明,WOMAC评分的疼痛子量表(<0.0001)和僵硬子量表(=0.01)的值较低。在静息时的VAS(=0.4)、运动时的VAS(=0.1)和WOMAC评分的功能子量表(=0.4)方面未观察到差异。报告随访5至8周数据的研究表明,静息时VAS较低,有利于HA组(=0.01)。在其他感兴趣的PROMs方面未观察到差异:运动时的VAS(=0.1)以及WOMAC评分的疼痛子量表(=0.3)、功能子量表(=0.4)和僵硬子量表(=其0.4)。目前的证据等级I表明,膝关节腔内注射HA可能在短期内减轻疼痛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/c5e6e70bf0ed/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/33554fe5dfc5/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/0eeae34394bd/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/15e2b23c02d5/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/c5e6e70bf0ed/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/33554fe5dfc5/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/0eeae34394bd/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/15e2b23c02d5/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7d/11597132/c5e6e70bf0ed/pharmaceuticals-17-01557-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Less Pain with Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis Compared to Placebo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.与安慰剂相比,关节内注射透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛更少:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 20;17(11):1557. doi: 10.3390/ph17111557.
2
Intra-articular injections of ozone versus hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: a level I meta-analysis.关节内注射臭氧与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项 I 级荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Nov 23;35(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04135-x.
3
Similar efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections and other biologically active injections in patients with early stages knee osteoarthritis: a level I meta-analysis.关节腔内注射透明质酸与其他生物活性注射剂治疗早期膝关节骨关节炎的疗效相似:一项I级荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05614-w.
4
Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid versus plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials : A meta-analysis.膝关节骨关节炎的透明质酸与富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF)关节内注射治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析 :一项荟萃分析
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;54(3):218-226. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04615-w. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
5
Comparison between intra-articular infiltrations of placebo, steroids, hyaluronic and PRP for knee osteoarthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.关节内注射安慰剂、皮质类固醇、透明质酸和富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎的比较:贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Sep;141(9):1473-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03551-y. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
Comparison of the short-term results of single-dose intra-articular peptide with hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized study.单次关节内注射肽与透明质酸和富含血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的短期疗效比较:一项随机研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;39(10):3057-3064. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05121-4. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections provide a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo only at short-term follow-up in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.关节内皮质类固醇注射在膝骨关节炎患者中与安慰剂相比仅在短期随访时具有临床相关益处:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Feb;32(2):311-322. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12057. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
8
Intra-Articular Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Injections Are No Different From Placebo in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.关节内间充质基质细胞注射与安慰剂在膝骨关节炎治疗中的效果无差异:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):340-358. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.透明质酸与富血小板血浆:一项比较临床结果及对膝关节骨关节炎关节内生物学影响的前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/0363546516665809. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Are leukocyte-poor or multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma more effective than hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.白细胞缺乏或多次注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎相比哪个更有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3879-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04637-5. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections May Be Beneficial in Patients with Less Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.关节内注射透明质酸可能对病情不太严重的膝关节骨关节炎患者有益:一项随机对照试验的系统评价
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02265-8.
2
Efficacy of decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) for articular cartilage repair in osteoarthritis (OA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.去细胞化细胞外基质(dECM)用于骨关节炎(OA)关节软骨修复的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 16;20(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05881-2.
3
Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections for hip osteoarthritis: a level I systematic review.
关节内注射透明质酸治疗髋骨关节炎:一项I级系统评价
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 9;35(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04292-7.