• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义线索有助于人工语言学习中的结构归纳。

Semantic cues facilitate structural generalizations in artificial language learning.

作者信息

Conwell Erin, Snedeker Jesse

机构信息

Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University.

Department of Psychology, Harvard University.

出版信息

Lang Learn Dev. 2024;20(4):364-379. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2024.2342873. Epub 2024 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1080/15475441.2024.2342873
PMID:39601021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588301/
Abstract

Natural languages contain systematic relationships between verb meaning and verb argument structure. Artificial language learning studies typically remove those relationships and instead pair verb meanings randomly with structures. Adult participants in such studies can detect statistical regularities associated with words in these languages and their use of novel words will adhere to those statistical regularities. However, word use in natural languages is associated with more than distributional statistics. Using an artificial language learning paradigm, we asked how a relationship between verb meaning and sentence structure affected learning and structure generalization. Twenty-four English-speaking adults watched videos described in an artificial language with two possible sentence structures. Half of the participants (statistics-only condition) learned a language with no relationship between verb meaning and sentence structure. The other half (semantics condition) learned a language in which verb meaning predicted which structures a verb occurred in. Although all learners were able to comprehend the learned structures with novel verbs, participants in the semantics conditions made grammaticality judgments and productions with novel verbs that were more consistent with the target language than participants in the statistics-only condition. The availability of semantic cues to verb subcategory supports artificial language learning.

摘要

自然语言中动词意义和动词论元结构之间存在系统的关系。人工语言学习研究通常会消除这些关系,而是将动词意义与结构随机配对。此类研究中的成年参与者能够检测出与这些语言中的单词相关的统计规律,并且他们对新单词的使用将遵循这些统计规律。然而,自然语言中的单词使用不仅仅与分布统计相关。我们采用人工语言学习范式,探究动词意义和句子结构之间的关系如何影响学习和结构泛化。24名说英语的成年人观看了用一种具有两种可能句子结构的人工语言描述的视频。一半的参与者(仅统计条件)学习的语言中动词意义和句子结构之间没有关系。另一半(语义条件)学习的语言中,动词意义能预测动词出现的结构。尽管所有学习者都能够理解带有新动词的所学结构,但语义条件下的参与者对新动词进行的语法性判断和生成比仅统计条件下的参与者更符合目标语言。动词子范畴的语义线索有助于人工语言学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/9e42b95f0159/nihms-1990963-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/0b54d45865f1/nihms-1990963-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/5270f1dd92be/nihms-1990963-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/9e42b95f0159/nihms-1990963-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/0b54d45865f1/nihms-1990963-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/5270f1dd92be/nihms-1990963-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11588301/9e42b95f0159/nihms-1990963-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Semantic cues facilitate structural generalizations in artificial language learning.语义线索有助于人工语言学习中的结构归纳。
Lang Learn Dev. 2024;20(4):364-379. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2024.2342873. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
2
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.获取与处理动词论元结构:微型语言中的分布学习
Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):165-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
3
Distributional learning in English: The effect of verb-specific biases and verb-general semantic mappings on sentence production.英语中的分布学习:动词特定偏向和动词一般语义映射对句子生成的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):113-128. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000814. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs.学习二语动词的语义范畴:以切割和打破动词为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0296628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296628. eCollection 2024.
5
Learning structural alternations: What guides learners' generalization?学习结构交替:什么指导学习者的泛化?
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104828. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104828. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Acquiring and Producing Sentences: Whether Learners Use Verb-Specific or Verb-General Information Depends on Cue Validity.获取与生成句子:学习者是使用特定动词信息还是一般动词信息取决于线索有效性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00404. eCollection 2016.
7
Word learning does not end at fast-mapping: evolution of verb meanings through reorganization of an entire semantic domain.单词学习并不会在快速映射阶段结束:通过整个语义领域的重新组织来演变动词含义。
Cognition. 2011 Jan;118(1):45-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
8
Do as I say, not as I do: a lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition.照我说的做,而不是照我做的做:英语方位动词类习得的词汇分布解释。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep;73:41-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
9
Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia.我们能否将动词与其论元结构分开?一项失语症群体研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jan;52(1):59-70. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12253. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
On the plasticity of semantic generalizations: children and adults modify their verb lexicalization biases in response to changing input.语义泛化的可塑性:儿童和成人根据输入变化调整动词词汇化偏向。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Mar;50(3):794-808. doi: 10.1037/a0034253. Epub 2013 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Developmental Trajectory of Nonadjacent Dependency Learning.非相邻依赖学习的发展轨迹
Infancy. 2005 Mar;7(2):183-206. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0702_4. Epub 2005 Mar 1.
2
Linguistic generalization on the basis of function and constraints on the basis of statistical preemption.基于功能的语言概括和基于统计优先的约束。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:276-293. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Acquiring and Producing Sentences: Whether Learners Use Verb-Specific or Verb-General Information Depends on Cue Validity.
获取与生成句子:学习者是使用特定动词信息还是一般动词信息取决于线索有效性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00404. eCollection 2016.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors.从处所过度泛化错误中撤退:语义学与统计学。
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):260-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
6
Meaning from syntax: evidence from 2-year-olds.从语法中推断意义:来自 2 岁儿童的证据。
Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
7
Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.基础英语语法结构的频率:语料库分析
J Mem Lang. 2007 Oct 1;57(3):348-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002.
8
"Really? She blicked the baby?": two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening.“真的吗?她打了宝宝?”:两岁幼儿通过倾听学习动词的组合事实。 (注:blicked这个词可能有误,推测可能是“hit”之类的词,这里暂且按字面翻译)
Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):619-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02341.x.
9
Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants.婴儿对语音交替的快速习得。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):238-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
10
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.获取与处理动词论元结构:微型语言中的分布学习
Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):165-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jul 27.