Goshi Ariha, Takeda Yu, Nakai Takuya, Fukunishi Shigeo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Goshi Hospital, 10-8-20, Nagasunishidoori, Amagasaki City, Hyogo, 660-0807, Japan.
Depertment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, 1-1, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya City, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2025 Jul;30(4):647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
The cemented stem can accommodate various shapes of femurs and is a stable stem with long-term results. Additionally, the cemented stem is a highly versatile stem that can be used to adjust stem anteversion in patients with variable femoral anteversion. On the other hand, rotating a stem with increasing cement viscosity may result in reduced postoperative rotational stability.
Rotational stability was compared using two different cementing techniques via in vitro models. Six stems in Group S (Static) were inserted and fixed until the cement was completely hardened. Six stems in Group R (Rotation) were inserted and then rotated 15° before the cement had fully cured. After the cement had completely set, a static rotation testing was performed in which the stem was rotated at a rate of 1°/sec to 20° while a vertical load of 600 N was applied. For the dynamic testing, a vertical load of 600 N and 10,000 cycles of repetitive rotation were applied at 10° around the stem axis at 0.1 Hz. After 10,000 cycles, maximum torque was compared between Groups S and R.
In both groups, the torque value increased proportionally to the rotation angle. There were no significant differences in resistance to static rotation between Groups S and R (P = 0.599). In the dynamic testing, there was no significant difference between Groups S and R in both minimum torque and maximum torque in any of the cycles. There were no differences in the rotational torque between Groups S and R at 10,000 cycles (P = 0.693).
The rotational stability of the cemented stems did not decrease in vitro when stem version control was performed up to 15° before the cement had completely hardened.
骨水泥型股骨柄可适应各种形状的股骨,是一种具有长期良好效果的稳定型股骨柄。此外,骨水泥型股骨柄用途广泛,可用于调整股骨前倾角不同的患者的股骨柄前倾角。另一方面,随着骨水泥粘度增加而旋转股骨柄可能会导致术后旋转稳定性降低。
通过体外模型使用两种不同的骨水泥固定技术比较旋转稳定性。S组(静态组)插入并固定6个股骨柄,直到骨水泥完全硬化。R组(旋转组)插入6个股骨柄,然后在骨水泥完全固化前旋转15°。骨水泥完全凝固后,进行静态旋转测试,在施加600N垂直载荷的同时,以1°/秒的速度将股骨柄旋转至20°。对于动态测试,在0.1Hz频率下围绕股骨柄轴线在10°处施加600N垂直载荷和10000次重复旋转。10000次循环后,比较S组和R组之间的最大扭矩。
两组中,扭矩值均与旋转角度成比例增加。S组和R组之间在静态旋转阻力方面无显著差异(P = 0.599)。在动态测试中,S组和R组在任何循环中的最小扭矩和最大扭矩方面均无显著差异。在10000次循环时,S组和R组之间的旋转扭矩无差异(P = 0.693)。
在骨水泥完全硬化前进行高达15°的股骨柄角度控制时,体外实验中骨水泥型股骨柄的旋转稳定性并未降低。