• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Embracing Complexity: Developing a Framework for Evaluating a Multi-Faceted Training and Technical Assistance System.拥抱复杂性:制定一个多方面培训和技术援助系统的评估框架。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):437-445. doi: 10.1177/01632787241269069.
2
Strategic Inter-agency Capacity Building for Primary Prevention of Harmful Behaviors in the Military: Current and Future Directions.军队中有害行为的初级预防:机构间战略能力建设:现状与未来方向。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):386-401. doi: 10.1177/01632787241291043.
3
Strengthening the Science and Practice of Implementation Support: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Training and Technical Assistance Centers.加强实施支持的科学与实践:评估培训和技术援助中心的有效性。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):143-153. doi: 10.1177/01632787241248768.
4
Training and technical assistance to enhance capacity building between prevention research centers and their partners.培训和技术援助,以加强预防研究中心与其合作伙伴之间的能力建设。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 May;8(3):A65. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
5
Technical assistance as a prevention capacity-building tool: a demonstration using the getting to outcomes framework.作为预防能力建设工具的技术援助:运用“实现成果”框架的示范
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5):810-28. doi: 10.1177/1090198108329999. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
6
Technical Assistance for Systemic Change: Lessons Learned From a National Technical Assistance Center.系统性变革的技术援助:国家技术援助中心的经验教训。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):219-229. doi: 10.1177/01632787241247853.
7
Evidence-Based Implementation Support: Considering Motivation and Capacity Within the Ecosystem of Training and Technical Assistance.基于证据的实施支持:在培训与技术援助生态系统中考虑动机和能力
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):488-493. doi: 10.1177/01632787241293457. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
8
The Use of the Data-to-Action Framework in the Evaluation of CDC's DELTA FOCUS Program.数据到行动框架在疾病控制与预防中心DELTA FOCUS项目评估中的应用
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jan/Feb;24 Suppl 1 Suppl, Injury and Violence Prevention(Suppl 1 INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION):S51-S58. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000677.
9
Supporting Implementation Through Online Learning Communities: Lessons Learned From a National Training and Technical Assistance Network.通过在线学习社区提供支持:从国家培训和技术援助网络中吸取的经验教训。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):178-191. doi: 10.1177/01632787241237246.
10
Commentary: The Need for Theories of Change in Training and Technical Assistance: Where the Rubber Meets the Road.述评:培训和技术援助中需要变革理论:实践与理论的碰撞。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):467-474. doi: 10.1177/01632787241289595.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of dissemination and implementation science capacity building programs around the globe.对全球范围内传播与实施科学能力建设项目的系统评价。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 27;4(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00405-7.
2
A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance.技术援助评估与效果的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00314-1.
3
Moving Evidence to Action: A Strategy to Support the Implementation of Comprehensive Violence Prevention Efforts.行动中的证据:支持实施综合暴力预防工作的策略。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Sep;23(5):824-833. doi: 10.1177/15248399211028156. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Developing an Evidence-Based Technical Assistance Model: a Process Evaluation of the National Training and Technical Assistance Center for Child, Youth, and Family Mental Health.制定基于证据的技术援助模式:国家儿童、青少年和家庭心理健康培训与技术援助中心的过程评估。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul;47(3):312-330. doi: 10.1007/s11414-020-09686-5.
5
Evaluating centralized technical assistance as an implementation strategy to improve cancer prevention and control.评估集中式技术援助作为改善癌症预防与控制的实施策略。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1108-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
6
Effectiveness of capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice: a systematic review.能力建设干预措施对公共卫生实践的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5591-6.
7
Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research.建设循证公共卫生能力:协调实践的拉力和研究的推力。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:27-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014746. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
The Data-to-Action Framework: A Rapid Program Improvement Process.数据到行动框架:一个快速的项目改进过程。
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Aug;42(4):471-9. doi: 10.1177/1090198115595010.
9
Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation.弥合预防研究与实践之间的差距:传播与实施的互动系统框架。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.
10
WHO Health Promotion Glossary: new terms.世界卫生组织健康促进术语汇编:新术语。
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):340-5. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal033. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

拥抱复杂性:制定一个多方面培训和技术援助系统的评估框架。

Embracing Complexity: Developing a Framework for Evaluating a Multi-Faceted Training and Technical Assistance System.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):437-445. doi: 10.1177/01632787241269069.

DOI:10.1177/01632787241269069
PMID:39604107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11686402/
Abstract

The benefits of training and technical assistance (TTA) have been well documented. There is limited literature that explores how complex systems of TTA are implemented and evaluated particularly in the violence prevention field. The Violence Prevention Practice and Translation Branch (VPPTB) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Division of Violence Prevention funds multiple technical assistance providers who are tasked with building the capacity of program recipients to implement comprehensive approaches to prevent multiple forms of violence. VPPTB designed the Violence Prevention Technical Assistance Center (VPTAC) with the goal of implementing and evaluating comprehensive TTA efforts that integrates the work of multiple TTA providers to build the capacity of recipients to plan, implement, and evaluate violence prevention efforts. The VPTAC evaluation incorporates data from program recipients, TTA providers, and TTA modalities enabling the VPPTB staff to show improvement in technical knowledge, gather examples of enhanced implementation, and facilitate proactive TTA planning. An important step in the process of evaluating VPTAC from a system-level perspective required an expansion beyond evaluating a single TTA event, provider, or engagement. This is essential to understand how a diverse set of TTA activities and partners work together in their efforts to build capacity.

摘要

培训和技术援助(TTA)的好处已有充分记录。但是,很少有文献探讨如何实施和评估 TTA 这一复杂系统,特别是在预防暴力领域。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)预防暴力司的暴力预防实践和转化处(VPPTB)为多个技术援助提供者提供资金,这些提供者的任务是增强方案接受者的能力,以实施综合方法预防多种形式的暴力。VPPTB 设计了暴力预防技术援助中心(VPTAC),旨在实施和评估综合 TTA 工作,整合多个 TTA 提供者的工作,以增强接受者规划、实施和评估预防暴力工作的能力。VPTAC 的评估纳入了方案接受者、TTA 提供者和 TTA 模式的数据,使 VPPTB 工作人员能够展示技术知识的提高、收集增强实施的示例,并促进积极的 TTA 规划。从系统层面评估 VPTAC 的一个重要步骤是需要超越评估单一 TTA 事件、提供者或参与度。这对于理解一组多样化的 TTA 活动和合作伙伴如何共同努力以增强能力至关重要。