• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估集中式技术援助作为改善癌症预防与控制的实施策略。

Evaluating centralized technical assistance as an implementation strategy to improve cancer prevention and control.

作者信息

Moreland-Russell Sarah, Adsul Prajakta, Nasir Seif, Fernandez Maria E, Walker Timothy J, Brandt Heather M, Vanderpool Robin C, Pilar Meagan, Cuccaro Paula, Norton Wynne E, Vinson Cynthia A, Chambers David A, Brownson Ross C

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus, Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1108-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-018-1108-y
PMID:30535940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6384813/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In 2015-2016, the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership provided technical assistance workshops to support 22 cancer coalitions in increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake and increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in their local communities. As national efforts continue to invest in providing technical assistance, there is a current gap in understanding its use as a strategy to accelerate implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for cancer prevention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of technical assistance on the participants' knowledge, attitudes, and skills for implementing EBIs in their local context and enhancing state team collaboration.

METHODS

Data were collected August-November 2017 using web-based questionnaires from 44 HPV workshop participants and 66 CRC workshop participants.

RESULTS

Both HPV vaccination and CRC screening workshop participants reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to implementing EBIs in their local state context. Several participants reported increased abilities in communicating and coordinating with partners in their states and utilizing additional implementation strategies to increase HPV vaccination uptake and CRC screening rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that providing technical assistance to members of comprehensive cancer control coalitions is useful in promoting collaborations and building capacity for implementing EBIs for cancer prevention and control.

摘要

目的

在2015 - 2016年期间,国家综合癌症控制伙伴关系举办了技术援助研讨会,以支持22个癌症联盟在其当地社区提高人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种率和增加结直肠癌(CRC)筛查。随着国家继续投入资源提供技术援助,目前在理解将其作为加速实施癌症预防循证干预措施(EBI)的策略方面存在差距。本研究的目的是评估技术援助对参与者在当地实施循证干预措施的知识、态度和技能以及加强州团队协作的影响。

方法

2017年8月至11月,通过基于网络的问卷对44名HPV研讨会参与者和66名CRC研讨会参与者收集数据。

结果

HPV疫苗接种和CRC筛查研讨会的参与者均报告了在其所在州实施循证干预措施相关的知识、态度和技能方面的变化。一些参与者报告说,他们与所在州的合作伙伴沟通和协调的能力有所提高,并且能够利用更多实施策略来提高HPV疫苗接种率和CRC筛查率。

结论

本研究结果表明,向综合癌症控制联盟成员提供技术援助有助于促进合作,并为实施癌症预防和控制的循证干预措施建设能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ce/6384813/508b9298ad6a/nihms-1005589-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ce/6384813/508b9298ad6a/nihms-1005589-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ce/6384813/508b9298ad6a/nihms-1005589-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating centralized technical assistance as an implementation strategy to improve cancer prevention and control.评估集中式技术援助作为改善癌症预防与控制的实施策略。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1108-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
2
Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.美国结直肠癌控制项目受助者的培训及技术援助需求评估
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1386-1.
3
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.
4
Evaluating implementation by rural clinics of evidence-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination.评估农村诊所实施基于证据的干预措施以促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的情况。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e70006. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70006.
5
Experiences and lessons learned from 29 HPV vaccination programs implemented in 19 low and middle-income countries, 2009-2014.2009年至2014年在19个低收入和中等收入国家实施的29项人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种项目的经验与教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1824-5.
6
Understanding quality improvement collaboratives through an implementation science lens.从实施科学的角度理解质量改进合作。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105859. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105859. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Using Implementation Mapping to increase uptake and use of : A breast and cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination intervention for Latinas.利用实施映射来增加拉丁裔妇女的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查及 HPV 疫苗接种干预措施的采用和使用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;11:966553. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.966553. eCollection 2023.
8
Efficacy to effectiveness transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (EPICS): study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.将教育计划提高结直肠癌筛查效果(EPICS)的疗效转化为效果的研究方案:一项群组随机对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 7;8:86. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-86.
9
Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.运用循证干预措施改善国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目中的癌症筛查工作。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):442-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369.
10
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.在真实初级保健环境中实施邮寄结直肠癌粪便筛查检测:有前景的实施实践和改进机会。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Embracing Complexity: Developing a Framework for Evaluating a Multi-Faceted Training and Technical Assistance System.拥抱复杂性:制定一个多方面培训和技术援助系统的评估框架。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):437-445. doi: 10.1177/01632787241269069.
2
Unpacking Technical Assistance (TA) Strategies Within a State-Level Prevention Support System: A Mixed-Method Study in Determining Types and Amount of TA.在州级预防支持系统中解析技术援助(TA)策略:一种确定 TA 类型和数量的混合方法研究。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):204-218. doi: 10.1177/01632787241248769.
3
Implementation of a novel program to support colorectal cancer screening in a community health center consortium before and after the onset of COVID-19: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review.促进医疗保健专业人员研究使用的角色和特征:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e014384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014384.
2
Human Papillomavirus Vaccine as an Anticancer Vaccine: Collaborative Efforts to Promote Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗作为一种抗癌疫苗:在国家癌症综合防控计划中推广人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的合作努力。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Mar;26(3):200-206. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6351. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
A U.S. "Cancer Moonshot" to accelerate cancer research.
一项关于在新冠疫情爆发前后,在社区卫生中心联盟实施一项支持结直肠癌筛查的新计划的定性研究:利益相关者观点研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 May 22;4(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00439-x.
4
A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance.技术援助评估与效果的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00314-1.
5
Technical Assistance and Training Needs of Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs: a Qualitative Analysis.综合性癌症控制计划的技术援助和培训需求:定性分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02131-5. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
6
The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN): Advancing public health and implementation science.癌症预防与控制研究网络(CPCRN):推进公共卫生和实施科学。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105824. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Comprehensive cancer control in the U.S.: summarizing twenty years of progress and looking ahead.美国的综合癌症控制:总结二十年进展并展望未来。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1305-1309. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1124-y. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
美国发起“抗癌登月计划”以加速癌症研究。
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1105-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aai7862. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.评估参与结直肠癌筛查的促进因素和障碍的定性研究的系统评价与荟萃综合分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jun;25(6):907-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0990. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Technical Assistance to Enhance Prevention Capacity: a Research Synthesis of the Evidence Base.加强预防能力的技术援助:基于证据的研究综述
Prev Sci. 2016 May;17(4):417-28. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0636-5.
7
Comprehensive Cancer Control Partners' Use of and Attitudes About Evidence-Based Practices.综合癌症控制合作伙伴对循证实践的应用及态度
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 16;12:E113. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150095.
8
What strategies are used to build practitioners' capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review.为增强从业者实施社区干预措施的能力采用了哪些策略,这些策略是否有效?一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2015 May 29;10:80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0272-7.
9
Can we achieve an 80% screening rate for colorectal cancer by 2018 in the United States?到2018年,我们能在美国实现80%的结直肠癌筛查率吗?
Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2127-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29335. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Use of Evidence-Based Practices and Resources Among Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs.综合癌症控制项目中基于证据的实践和资源的使用情况。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):441-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000053.