• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞在股骨颈骨折患者术前康复(Prehabilitation)中的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验的研究方案。

Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in preoperative rehabilitation (Prehabilitation) for patients with femoral neck fractures: study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02620-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02620-8
PMID:39604847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11600646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite surgery intervention for femoral neck fractures is recommended within 48 h of admission, achieving timely surgery presents challenges for patients with severe comorbidities, or in resource-limited settings. Preoperative rehabilitation (prehabilitation) reduces bedridden time, enhances mobility, and improves postoperative outcomes for patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty due to femoral neck fractures. However, prehabilitation is hindered by insufficient pain control. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides effective analgesia while preserving motor function. We designed a study to assess the efficacy of PENG block in facilitating prehabilitation for patients with femoral neck fractures who are scheduled for hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded trial aims to enroll 100 patients with Garden 3 or 4 femoral neck fractures who are scheduled for hip arthroplasty. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a PENG block with 0.375% ropivacaine (PENG group) or with normal saline (placebo group) before the initial prehabilitation session. The prehabilitation program comprises five items: Bed-sitting, Edge-sitting, Stand-up, Maintaining-standing, and Wheelchair-transfer, performed with the assistance of a single physical therapist. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients completing the entire prehabilitation program. Secondary outcomes during the initial prehabilitation session are the achievement of each program item and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. Other secondary outcomes include intraoperative bleeding amounts, thromboembolic events during postoperative day 0 to 7, postoperative 3-day cumulative Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS), and discharge destination. The postoperative outcomes will be compared between subgroups of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of admission and those undergoing surgery more than 48 h of admission.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study aiming to assess the efficacy of PENG block in prehabilitation for patients with femoral neck fractures who are scheduled for hip arthroplasty. PENG block could be beneficial, especially for patients facing delayed surgery, providing a potential treatment option during the waiting period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCT1031220294, registered on August 26, 2022.

摘要

背景

尽管建议股骨颈骨折患者在入院后 48 小时内进行手术干预,但对于患有严重合并症的患者或在资源有限的环境中,实现及时手术具有挑战性。术前康复(prehabilitation)可减少卧床时间,提高活动能力,并改善因股骨颈骨折接受髋关节置换术的患者的术后结果。然而,prehabilitation 受到疼痛控制不足的阻碍。囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞可提供有效的镇痛效果,同时保留运动功能。我们设计了一项研究,以评估 PENG 阻滞在促进计划接受髋关节置换术的股骨颈骨折患者 prehabilitation 中的疗效。

方法

本前瞻性随机安慰剂对照双盲试验旨在纳入 100 名 Garden 3 或 4 型股骨颈骨折且计划接受髋关节置换术的患者。参与者将被随机分配接受 0.375%罗哌卡因的 PENG 阻滞(PENG 组)或生理盐水(安慰剂组),然后再进行首次 prehabilitation 治疗。prehabilitation 方案包括五项内容:床上坐起、床边坐起、站立、保持站立和轮椅转移,由一名物理治疗师协助完成。主要结局是完成整个 prehabilitation 方案的患者比例。首次 prehabilitation 治疗时的次要结局是每个方案项目的完成情况和数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分。其他次要结局包括术中出血量、术后 0 至 7 天内的血栓栓塞事件、术后 3 天累积的活动评分(CAS)和出院去向。将对入院后 48 小时内和入院后超过 48 小时进行手术的患者亚组进行术后结局比较。

讨论

这是第一项旨在评估 PENG 阻滞在计划接受髋关节置换术的股骨颈骨折患者 prehabilitation 中的疗效的研究。PENG 阻滞可能有益,特别是对于面临延迟手术的患者,为等待期间提供了一种潜在的治疗选择。

试验注册

日本临床试验注册中心,jRCT1031220294,于 2022 年 8 月 26 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43da/11600646/ed2edc1c45a5/12871_2024_2620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43da/11600646/ed2edc1c45a5/12871_2024_2620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43da/11600646/ed2edc1c45a5/12871_2024_2620_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in preoperative rehabilitation (Prehabilitation) for patients with femoral neck fractures: study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞在股骨颈骨折患者术前康复(Prehabilitation)中的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验的研究方案。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02620-8.
2
Utilization of the pericapsular nerve group block in preoperative rehabilitation of patients with femoral neck fractures -a case series.股骨颈骨折患者术前康复中关节囊周围神经群阻滞的应用——病例系列
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct;77(5):565-569. doi: 10.4097/kja.24232. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study.连续关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与连续股外侧肌间隔阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理和股四头肌肌力的比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02190-1.
4
Efficacy and safety of perioperative analgesia in PENG block for children undergoing hip surgery with developmental dysplasia: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial.发育性髋关节发育不良患儿行髋关节手术时腰丛神经阻滞围手术期镇痛的有效性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、非劣效性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Jan 18;26(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08725-w.
5
Effects of pericapsular nerve group block on early postoperative cognitive function in older people undergoing hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled clinical trial.关节囊周围神经群阻滞对老年人髋关节置换术后早期认知功能的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05543-8.
6
The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) compared to placebo and LIA in hip arthroplasty surgery: a multi-center double-blinded randomized-controlled trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛(LIA)与安慰剂和 LIA 在髋关节置换术中的比较:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01787-2.
7
Preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.全髋关节置换术前关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Mar;47(3):155-160. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103228. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛对全髋关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
9
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.股骨干骨折中股神经阻滞与 PENG 阻滞的比较:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252716. eCollection 2021.
10
The PENG Block in Elective Primary Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with Reduced Length of Stay: A Multidisciplinary Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.选择性初次前路全髋关节置换术中的腰大肌阻滞与住院时间缩短相关:一项多学科前瞻性随机双盲对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Apr 16;107(8):805-810. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00825. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
PENG block associated with dexmedetomidine sedation for intramedullary femoral fixation in high-risk elderly patients: a case series and review of the literature.PENG 块与右美托咪定镇静联合用于高危老年患者股骨髓内固定:病例系列研究和文献复习。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Oct;27(20):10061-10068. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202310_34186.
2
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for early pain management of elderly patients with hip fracture: a single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞用于老年髋部骨折患者的早期疼痛管理:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Nov;48(11):535-539. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104117. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
The Efficiency of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Pain Management after Hip Surgery: A Meta-analysis.
超声引导下髋关节囊周围神经组阻滞用于髋关节手术后疼痛管理的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Pain Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00463-0. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline.美国矫形外科医师学会《老年人髋部骨折管理:循证临床实践指南》
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct 15;30(20):e1297-e1301. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00273.
5
The Use of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Hip Surgeries Is Associated With a Reduction in Opioid Consumption, Less Motor Block, and Better Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.髋关节手术中使用关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与阿片类药物消耗量减少、运动阻滞减轻及患者满意度提高相关:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 6;14(9):e28872. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28872. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Effect of a preoperative mobilization program on perioperative complications and function recovery in older adults with femoral neck fracture.术前活动方案对老年股骨颈骨折患者围手术期并发症和功能恢复的影响。
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;44:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.股骨干骨折中股神经阻滞与 PENG 阻滞的比较:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252716. eCollection 2021.
8
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture.髋关节骨折的囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
9
Effectiveness of preoperative physical therapy for older patients with hip fracture.术前物理治疗对老年髋部骨折患者的疗效。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Jul;18(7):1003-1008. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13290. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.测试与训练的运动标准:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):873-934. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829b5b44. Epub 2013 Jul 22.