• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Regulating professional ethics in a context of technological change.在技术变革的背景下规范职业道德。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 27;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01140-x.
2
Medical assistance in dying in Canada: A review of regulatory practice standards and guidance documents for physicians.加拿大的医疗协助死亡:医生监管实践标准与指导文件综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jun 24;19:26323524251338859. doi: 10.1177/26323524251338859. eCollection 2025.
3
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:关注伦理问题,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01066-4.
2
AI Through Ethical Lenses: A Discourse Analysis of Guidelines for AI in Healthcare.人工智能的伦理视角:医疗保健中人工智能指南的话语分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00486-0.
3
Ethical considerations and concerns in the implementation of AI in pharmacy practice: a cross-sectional study.在药学实践中实施人工智能的伦理考虑和关注点:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 16;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01062-8.
4
Navigating the ethical landscape of artificial intelligence in radiography: a cross-sectional study of radiographers' perspectives.医学影像学中人工智能伦理问题的探索:放射技师观点的横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 11;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-w.
5
Professional regulation in the digital era: A qualitative case study of three professions in Ontario, Canada.数字时代的专业监管:以加拿大安大略省的三个职业为例的定性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303192. eCollection 2024.
6
Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study.将伦理融入 AI 开发:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 23;25(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-01000-0.
7
Defining medical liability when artificial intelligence is applied on diagnostic algorithms: a systematic review.人工智能应用于诊断算法时医疗责任的界定:一项系统综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 27;10:1305756. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1305756. eCollection 2023.
8
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.人工智能在临床实践中的应用:医疗保健的革命。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
9
Clinicians and AI use: where is the professional guidance?临床医生和人工智能的使用:专业指导在哪里?
J Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 21;50(7):437-441. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108831.
10
The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare.对医疗保健领域的大语言模型(或生成式人工智能)进行监管监督的必要性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 6;6(1):120. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0.

在技术变革的背景下规范职业道德。

Regulating professional ethics in a context of technological change.

机构信息

Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 27;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01140-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01140-x
PMID:39604928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11603855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technological change is impacting the work of health professionals, especially with recent developments in artificial intelligence. Research has raised many ethical considerations respecting clinical applications of artificial intelligence, and it has identified a role for professional regulation in helping to guide practitioners in the ethical use of technology; however, regulation in this area has been slow to develop. This study seeks to identify the challenges that health professionals face in the context of technological change, and whether regulators' codes of ethics and guidance are sufficient to help workers navigate these changes.

METHODS

We conducted mixed methods research in Ontario, Canada, using qualitative content analysis of regulators' codes of ethics and practice guidance (26 regulators, 63 documents analysed), interviews with 7 representatives from 5 health profession regulatory bodies, and focus groups with 17 healthcare practitioners across 5 professions in the province. We used thematic analysis to analyse the data and answer our core research questions.

RESULTS

We find that codes of ethics focus more on general principles and managing practitioners' relationships with clients/patients; hence, it is not clear that these documents can successfully guide professional practice in a context of rapid technological change. Practitioners and regulatory body staff express ambivalence and uncertainty about regulators' roles in regulating technology use. In some instances, health professionals experience conflict between the expectations of their regulator and their employer. These gaps and conflicts leave some professionals uncertain about how to practice ethically in a digital age.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for more guidance and regulation in this area, not only for practitioners, but with respect to the application of technology within the environments in which health professionals work.

摘要

背景

技术变革正在影响医疗专业人员的工作,尤其是在人工智能方面的最新进展。研究提出了许多与人工智能在临床应用方面有关的伦理问题,并确定了专业监管在帮助指导从业者以合乎道德的方式使用技术方面的作用;然而,这一领域的监管发展缓慢。本研究旨在确定医疗专业人员在技术变革背景下面临的挑战,以及监管机构的道德规范和指导方针是否足以帮助工作人员应对这些变化。

方法

我们在加拿大安大略省进行了混合方法研究,对监管机构的道德规范和实践指南(26 个监管机构,分析了 63 份文件)进行了定性内容分析,对来自 5 个健康专业监管机构的 7 名代表进行了访谈,并对全省 5 个专业的 17 名医疗保健从业者进行了焦点小组讨论。我们使用主题分析来分析数据并回答我们的核心研究问题。

结果

我们发现,道德规范更多地关注一般原则和管理从业者与客户/患者的关系;因此,这些文件是否能够在快速技术变革的背景下成功指导专业实践尚不清楚。从业者和监管机构工作人员对监管机构在监管技术使用方面的角色表示矛盾和不确定。在某些情况下,医疗专业人员在其监管机构和雇主的期望之间感到冲突。这些差距和冲突使一些专业人员对如何在数字时代以合乎道德的方式实践感到不确定。

结论

需要在这一领域制定更多的指导和监管措施,不仅是为了从业者,而且还需要规范技术在医疗专业人员工作环境中的应用。