Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Programa de Graduação em Desastres Naturais, Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais (CEMADEN), Rodovia Presidente Dutra, Km 137.8, Eugênio de Melo, 12247-004 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Rodovia Presidente Dutra, Km 137,8, Eugênio de Melo, 12247-004 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2024 Nov 22;96(suppl 3):e20230768. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202420230768. eCollection 2024.
Designing ecological corridors studies are much more common than studies that evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of implementation. Thus, this study aimed to identify and discuss factors that can influence the implementation of ecological corridors designed from a multicriteria analysis. For this purpose, the ecological corridor implementation efforts of a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in an Atlantic Forest region were evaluated. The following information about the restoration projects was collected from the NGO database: georeferenced restoration polygons, restoration technique, project size, motivation, and land use tenure characteristics of the restoration site. Restoration polygons were spatially referenced to the planned corridor areas and classified according to land use and land cover, slope, distance to roads and occurrence in Permanent Preservation Areas. The NGO implemented 455.0 hectares of restoration, with only 10.7% within proposed corridors. NGO projects were concentrated on ecological restoration, which presents significant differences between ecological corridors. In practice, the implementation of restoration areas was primarily guided by the local characteristics of the landscape, project's constraints and the will and interest of rural landowners in restoring their properties. This differs from its planning, in which social and economic aspects were not considered and only the environmental variables were taken into.
设计生态廊道的研究比评估实施效果和实用性的研究更为常见。因此，本研究旨在从多准则分析的角度识别和讨论可能影响设计的生态廊道实施的因素。为此，评估了一家非政府组织（NGO）在大西洋森林地区实施生态廊道的努力。从 NGO 的数据库中收集了以下有关恢复项目的信息：地理参考恢复多边形、恢复技术、项目规模、动机以及恢复地点的土地使用保有权特征。恢复多边形与计划中的廊道区域进行空间参考，并根据土地利用和土地覆盖、坡度、距离道路的距离以及在永久性保护区域的存在情况进行分类。NGO 实施了 455.0 公顷的恢复，其中只有 10.7%位于提议的廊道内。NGO 项目主要集中在生态恢复上，这与生态廊道有显著的差异。在实践中，恢复区域的实施主要受到景观的局部特征、项目的限制以及农村土地所有者恢复其财产的意愿和利益的指导。这与规划不同，规划中没有考虑社会和经济方面，只考虑了环境变量。
