• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能安全家居解决方案对居家老年人生活质量和健康结局的影响:随机对照试验

Impact of the Smarter Safer Homes Solution on Quality of Life and Health Outcomes in Older People Living in Their Own Homes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Lu Wei, Silvera-Tawil David, Yoon Hwan-Jin, Higgins Liesel, Zhang Qing, Karunanithi Mohanraj, Bomke Julia, Byrnes Joshua, Hewitt Jennifer, Smallbon Vanessa, Freyne Jill, Prabhu Deepa, Varnfield Marlien

机构信息

Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Research Center for Frontier Fundamental Studies, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, ZheJiang, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e59921. doi: 10.2196/59921.

DOI:10.2196/59921
PMID:39608020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799804/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasingly aging population, accompanied by a shortage of residential aged care homes and workforce and consumer feedback, has driven a growing interest in enabling older people to age in place through home-based care. In this context, smart home technologies for remote health monitoring have gained popularity for supporting older people to live in their own homes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the impact of smart home monitoring on multiple outcomes, including quality of life, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms among older people living in their own homes over a 12-month period.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. The control group continued to receive their existing care from aged care service providers. Meanwhile, the intervention group, in addition to receiving their usual aged care services, had their activities of daily living monitored using a smart home platform. Surveys including the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL), Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were conducted at baseline and 6 and 12 months from baseline. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare the difference between the intervention and control groups, with the ASCOT as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Data from 130 participants were used in the analysis, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the control group (n=61) and the intervention group (n=69). In comparison to the control group, the intervention group had a higher ASCOT score at the 6-month assessment (mean difference 0.045, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.089; Cohen d=0.377). However, this difference did not persist at the 12-month assessment (mean difference 0.031, 95% CI -0.014 to 0.076; Cohen d=0.259). There were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L, Katz ADL, IADL, and GDS observed between the intervention and control groups at the 6-month and 12-month assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that smart home monitoring can improve social care-related quality of life for older people living in their own homes. However, the improvement was not sustained over the long term. The lack of statistically significant findings and diminished long-term improvements may be attributed to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic during the later stage of the trial. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to evaluate the effect of smart home monitoring on broader quality-of-life measures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000829213; https://tinyurl.com/2n6a75em.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/31970.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化日益加剧,同时伴有养老院及工作人员短缺以及消费者反馈等问题,这使得人们越来越关注如何通过居家护理让老年人能够在家中养老。在此背景下,用于远程健康监测的智能家居技术因能支持老年人居家生活而受到欢迎。

目的

本研究旨在调查智能家居监测对多种结果的影响,包括居家老年人在12个月期间的生活质量、日常生活活动能力及抑郁症状。

方法

我们进行了一项开放标签、平行组随机对照试验。对照组继续接受老年护理服务提供者提供的现有护理。与此同时,干预组除接受常规老年护理服务外,还通过智能家居平台对其日常生活活动进行监测。在基线以及基线后6个月和12个月进行了包括成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)、欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)、日常生活活动能力的Katz指数(Katz ADL)、Lawton日常生活活动能力量表(IADL)和老年抑郁量表(GDS)在内的调查。使用线性混合效应模型比较干预组和对照组之间的差异,以ASCOT作为主要结局指标。

结果

分析使用了130名参与者的数据,对照组(n = 61)和干预组(n = 69)的基线特征无显著差异。与对照组相比,干预组在6个月评估时ASCOT得分更高(平均差异0.045,95%CI 0.001至0.089;Cohen d = 0.377)。然而,这种差异在12个月评估时未持续存在(平均差异0.031,95%CI -0.014至0.076;Cohen d = 0.259)。在6个月和12个月评估时,干预组和对照组在EQ-5D-5L、Katz ADL、IADL和GDS方面均未观察到显著差异。

结论

该研究表明,智能家居监测可以改善居家老年人与社会护理相关的生活质量。然而,这种改善并未长期持续。缺乏具有统计学意义的结果以及长期改善效果减弱可能归因于试验后期COVID-19大流行的影响。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究,以评估智能家居监测对更广泛生活质量指标的影响。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN126180008

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a03/11799804/ad74a5dd6837/jmir_v27i1e59921_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a03/11799804/62bddba00e7a/jmir_v27i1e59921_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a03/11799804/ad74a5dd6837/jmir_v27i1e59921_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a03/11799804/62bddba00e7a/jmir_v27i1e59921_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a03/11799804/ad74a5dd6837/jmir_v27i1e59921_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the Smarter Safer Homes Solution on Quality of Life and Health Outcomes in Older People Living in Their Own Homes: Randomized Controlled Trial.智能安全家居解决方案对居家老年人生活质量和健康结局的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e59921. doi: 10.2196/59921.
2
The Smarter Safer Homes Solution to Support Older People Living in Their Own Homes Through Enhanced Care Models: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.通过强化护理模式支持老年人居家生活的更智能、更安全的家庭解决方案:一项分层随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 24;11(1):e31970. doi: 10.2196/31970.
3
Exercise for depression in care home residents: a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis (OPERA).养老院居民抑郁的运动干预: 一项随机对照试验及成本效益分析 (OPERA)。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(18):1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17180.
4
Efficacy of an Intelligent and Integrated Older Adult Care Model on Quality of Life Among Home-Dwelling Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.智能综合老年护理模式对居家老年人生活质量的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 21;27:e67950. doi: 10.2196/67950.
5
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.辅助技术和远程监护以维持痴呆症患者的独立居家生活:ATTILA RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190.
6
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Interprofessional medication assessment among home care patients: any impact on functioning? Results from a randomised controlled trial.家庭护理患者的跨专业药物评估:对功能有何影响?一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01796-1.
9
BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.BoTULS 研究:一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估 A 型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的临床疗效和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260.
10
The Effectiveness of a PRoactive Multicomponent Intervention Program on Disability in Independently Living Older People: A Randomized Controlled Trial.主动式多组分干预方案对独立生活老年人残疾的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(9):1051-1059. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1101-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting Depression-related Movement Changes in Older Adults using Smart Home Motion Sensors - A Feasibility Study.使用智能家居运动传感器检测老年人与抑郁症相关的运动变化——一项可行性研究。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-5. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340431.
2
The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia.使用包含持续时间和死亡的离散选择实验来开发澳大利亚的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Apr;41(4):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01243-0. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Can Smart Home Technologies Help Older Adults Manage Their Chronic Condition? A Systematic Literature Review.
智能家居技术能否帮助老年人管理其慢性病?系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021205.
4
Modelling SARS-CoV-2 disease progression in Australia and New Zealand: an account of an agent-based approach to support public health decision-making.基于代理的方法模拟 SARS-CoV-2 在澳大利亚和新西兰的疾病进展:支持公共卫生决策的报告。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Jun;46(3):292-303. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13221. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
The Smarter Safer Homes Solution to Support Older People Living in Their Own Homes Through Enhanced Care Models: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.通过强化护理模式支持老年人居家生活的更智能、更安全的家庭解决方案:一项分层随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 24;11(1):e31970. doi: 10.2196/31970.
6
The effectiveness of smart home technologies to support the health outcomes of community-dwelling older adults living with dementia: A scoping review.智能家居技术对支持社区居住的老年痴呆症患者健康结果的有效性:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Sep;153:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104513. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review.2019冠状病毒病大流行对老年人的影响:快速综述
JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 12;4(2):e26474. doi: 10.2196/26474.
8
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing and cognitive functioning of older adults.COVID-19 大流行对老年人的幸福感和认知功能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84127-7.
9
Care workers' perspectives of factors affecting a sustainable aged care workforce.照顾者对影响老年护理人员可持续性的因素的看法。
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Mar;68(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/inr.12635. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.封锁期间谁感到孤独?新冠疫情前和期间孤独的预测因素的跨队列分析。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Aug 5.